Denture Don is in full-on panic mode because JD Vance is an absolute disaster. Rumor is that he wants to drop Vance for Tulsi Gabbard.
I want Trump to lose, so I hope he keeps Vance. But if I were Trump, I'd ditch Vance right now for someone like Rubio or Cotton who can at least pretend to be conservative. Trump needs to bring back actual conservatives, because he's losing them by the day with his sh!t ranting and posting. Vance is just a dud. He's not doing anything for Trump. He can't naturally act the part, and when he tries to, he just looks weird. He's an awkward guy, not in tune with his surroundings. Plus, I heard he wore some flower dress to his own Hindu wedding.
Trump still has time to do this. When Biden dropped out, I think many people thought it was way too late in the campaign season to get another candidate. At least I did. I was wrong. The switch to Harris became old news within days. Trump could switch out Vance today and no one would remember it was an issue a week from now.
What I REALLY wish the GOP would do is finally throw Trump under the bus and run ANYONE else. He deserves to be disappeared. I don't think it's too late for that even. Rubio, Cotton, Haley, any of those people could jump in and run 50-50 with Harris. But this MAG@ disease is just fvcking entrenched. It just won't go away like other political fads do. WTF?
don-OLD is all over the place on abortion rights (6 weeks? Longer? Federal Ban? Clueless?) in a way that won't help him with anyone. And we're concerned about Harris changing her views of fracking?
And he thinks that the Federal Government is going to pay for everyone's IVF treatments? At an average of about $40k per couple?
don-OLD is all over the place on abortion rights (6 weeks? Longer? Federal Ban? Clueless?) in a way that won't help him with anyone. And we're concerned about Harris changing her views of fracking?
DJT: "My Administration will be great for women and their reproductive rights."
don-OLD is all over the place on abortion rights (6 weeks? Longer? Federal Ban? Clueless?) in a way that won't help him with anyone. And we're concerned about Harris changing her views of fracking?
DJT: "My Administration will be great for women and their reproductive rights."
He does NOT support a federal ban.
He'd sign one in a minute if it landed on his desk and people told him that "everyone supports it."
He literally says that "everyone supported overturning Roe and sending it back to the states."
don-OLD is a useful idiot and he'll do as he is flattered to do.
I don't think it's too late for that even. Rubio, Cotton, Haley, any of those people could jump in and run 50-50 with Harris.
If don-OLD isn't on the ticket, for any reason, the GOP will get slaughtered due to low voter turnout.
This is all Dark MF Brandon's doing. Dude saved the fkn Joker card for his final hand and they never saw it coming. He left them trapped with GOAT loser trump with nowhere to go. We are watching the makings of an epic implosion. Biden is one of the greatest Americans ever. It was a George MF Washington move.
AbstractThis article establishes three explanations for the views of liberal critics of Roe. First, for decades after the New Deal confrontation between Pr
None of that has anything to do with jury instructions. That has to do with sufficiency of evidence, exclusion of evidence, and charges. Not jury instructions. So, you jumped in here defending Winston "Blame America for WWII" Smith on his obvious lie about jury instructions by posting an article about a different jury instruction and now, within two posts, have meandered to entirely different issues. You lack focus, which is usually a sign of someone who is biased, uninformed and/or of average intelligence.
Again, that has nothing to do with jury instructions. In any case, the prosecution put in evidence of FEC violations. Unrebutted evidence that Pecker/National Enquirer spent $150,000 to buy and bury a hooker story intending to influence the election on Trump's behalf. Pecker's unrebutted testimony was that he knew that was illegal.
Similarly, unrebutted documentary evidence and unrebutted testimony from Cohen (remember that Trump refused to testify) was that Cohen paid Daniels on behalf of the Trump campaign to keep quiet about the time that Trump romped with Daniels because she looks like Trump's daughter. Creepy and unrebutted.
There is plenty more, but since you didn't even try to support your statement that "there was no FEC violation," I don't see the point of typing more myself.
Again, that has nothing to do with jury instructions. It has to do with exclusion of evidence.
You don't provide any details at all about the testimony you say the judge disallowed. I doubt you know of any -- you are probably just repeating a trite statement you read on Twitter.
It's difficult to respond to blanket, unsupported, unidentified assertions. If you can be more specific about where this occurred in a three week trial with hundreds of evidentiary rulings, I may respond. For now, I'd point Trump out that had full opportunity to cross-examine every witness in the case about FEC violations, including Pecker, Cohen and Daniels and also had full opportunity to introduce any Trump documents related to the issue. The jury weighed all that and disagreed with you.
You don't appear to have looked at anything and are meandering all over the place. Indicates probable bias and a lack of impartiality and lack of observance.
I don't know if he is or not. Tim Parlatore is. In the article you linked, those two were discussing a jury instruction. You have not discussed any jury instructions. You haven't really discussed much of anything. Just kind of sprayed a few broad and unrelated statements.
You're demonstrating that you either didn't follow the trial or you didn't understand the case.
Peck doing something on Trump's behalf isn't a crime Trump committed. That cannot be the mystery crime that elevated the misdemeanor bookkeeping charge to a felony.
The FEC looked at the case and declined to bring charges long before Bragg invented this case. An expert in federal election law was going to testify to the fact that no crime was committed regarding campaign finance law and the judge refused to allow it.
He then went on to allow the jury to falsely believe a campaign finance crime had been committed. He tainted the jury.
You keep harping on things that weren't crimes. Sleeping with a pornstar isn't a crime. Paying her hush money isn't a crime. Paying a lawyer to handle the situation and calling the expense a legal expense isn't a crime. Even if you pretend it is it's a minor misdemeanor.
The felony required to elevate that midemeanor to a felony simply does not exist.
You're a beta poster. Very weak person. Your best efforts got you skunked. You will never be anything other than mediocre here and in life. I think you know how ineffectual you are.
don-OLD is all over the place on abortion rights (6 weeks? Longer? Federal Ban? Clueless?) in a way that won't help him with anyone. And we're concerned about Harris changing her views of fracking?
DJT: "My Administration will be great for women and their reproductive rights."
He does NOT support a federal ban.
The only people his admin was great for were billionaires, dictators and aspiring criminals.
You've totally lost it... your guy's campaign is starting to give off Mondale vibes.
You are clueless. Cackles hurt herself last night. She's better off remaining in the basement.
She will never do an unscripted interview nor a press conference. Her advisors cannot risk putting her in front of the press.
The polls next week will show her continued rise. Absolutely nothing new has happened to stop her momentum. She's in control and your guy is flailing. We've seen enough week after week, not to mention JV is getting booed off the stage these days. THERE ARE REPUBLICANS TALKING ABOUT TRUMP DROPPING JV FOR RFK OR TULSI. Let that $hit sink in.
You are clueless. Cackles hurt herself last night. She's better off remaining in the basement.
She will never do an unscripted interview nor a press conference. Her advisors cannot risk putting her in front of the press.
The polls next week will show her continued rise. Absolutely nothing new has happened to stop her momentum. She's in control and your guy is flailing. We've seen enough week after week, not to mention JV is getting booed off the stage these days. THERE ARE REPUBLICANS TALKING ABOUT TRUMP DROPPING JV FOR RFK OR TULSI. Let that $hit sink in.
Her insurrection bump after kicking Biden off the ballot (convention) already happened.
:focal(0x0:3000x2000)/static.texastribune.org/media/files/45a1f1a21b58e7d117292ba045f02038/0215%20Shawn%20Thierry%20MF%20TT%2004.jpg)