It's not really a "hot take" that nations act in their own self-interest and that coalitions of nations act in their mutual interest. That said, it's not self evident that the world would be a better place for most of the world's people in the absence of western hegemony.
I don't agree that "we" wanted to "destroy Russia and be the lone empire of the world" as long as Russia played nice with the western world. That was the impetus for German policy for the last few decades, that is economic co-dependence as a perceived antidote for conflict. As an economic power, Russia's potential has largely been squandered under Putin's kleptocratic reign, and that has a much more to do with the current situation than does western imperialism.
Not a "hot take", yet most people here have no idea it is the undeniable reality. The US is not sending weapons to help Ukrainians, they're sending weapons to help the rich and powerful of the US. And since US taxpayers have to pay the bill, an agenda is created to justify such spending.
You still haven't answered these questions relating to your "America manipulated Russia into invading Ukraine in order to destroy Russia" as part of "the most preplanned and logical thing ever" theory. See page 535.
-------
Reposted from page 535:
Your theory is that the US has manipulated Russia (Putin) into invading Ukraine so that the US could respond, via Ukraine, and escalate and eventually overthrow Putin and destroy and/or occupy Russia.
Do Putin and his advisors now know how badly they got played into participating in their own destruction? Why were they so naive and gullible to have fallen for this trap? Don't they know that the US played the same trick in WWII (Pearl Harbor)?
Why did the US use Ukraine as the middleman? Wouldn't it have been easier and faster to just make Putin invade Latvia or Lithuania, which are NATO members (article 5 easy to invoke) that already have US weapons ready to go?
What do you know about the US timetable for accomplishing all this and destroying Russia? Roughly 4-5 years like with WWII?
Sounds like Marxist/Antifa/BLM brainwashing at work here. The ultimate failed parasitic ideology.
Let me explain. Western values are indeed hyprocitical garbage. Since I am one of those people, who made good money by systematically privatizing profits and socializing losses, you can believe me, when I say, it's all a scam :)
Whenever the idea of indefinite growth fails de facto, rich save it via socialism. So you can pretend not to see it all you want, yet it's exactly what's happening.
So your morally corrupt view of the situation in Ukraine is a projection of your own selling out to greed, power and ego. Fair enough, just don't expect those of us without broken souls to sign on to your vapid, nihilist worldview. But... we are making progress here in understanding the evil that resides in the hearts of those who just want to see the world burn, whether it is you, carmine-nein! or Putin himself.
Dr. Peterson's extensive catalog is available now on DailyWire+: https://utm.io/ueSXhDr Jordan B Peterson and Dr. Bjørn Lomborg discuss the present sense of ...
For quote context, the Yugoslavia Army was literally targeting Kosovar Albanian civilians and NATO was trying to stop them from doing so via an aerial campaign. The Kosov intervention was on shaky international legal grounds and some of the airstrikes were unfortunate, but as a moral equivalence to Russia's infrastructure bombing campaign in Ukraine, it's not a great example.
When we talk about the West, it's "shaky legal grounds" and "unfortunate air strikes", but when we talk about the East, it's "illegal" and "war crimes".
So your morally corrupt view of the situation in Ukraine is a projection of your own selling out to greed, power and ego. Fair enough, just don't expect those of us without broken souls to sign on to your vapid, nihilist worldview. But... we are making progress here in understanding the evil that resides in the hearts of those who just want to see the world burn, whether it is you, carmine-nein! or Putin himself.
The only difference between you and me is that I know and admit that we are just as corrupt as the East. You're still naive enough to think that your "unbroken soul" can impact what your government is doing. US government will kill 100.000 civilians in the Middle East and you will think it's for the good of the humanity, because they said so.
Regarding financial system: you can twist is as you want it, but your beloved capitalism has to be bailed out by socialism on regular basis.
For quote context, the Yugoslavia Army was literally targeting Kosovar Albanian civilians and NATO was trying to stop them from doing so via an aerial campaign. The Kosov intervention was on shaky international legal grounds and some of the airstrikes were unfortunate, but as a moral equivalence to Russia's infrastructure bombing campaign in Ukraine, it's not a great example.
When we talk about the West, it's "shaky legal grounds" and "unfortunate air strikes", but when we talk about the East, it's "illegal" and "war crimes".
Meanwhile in both cases the results are the same.
I'm geing as generous as possible while politely calling out your analogy.
Kosovo was an intervention to stop genocide and a humanitarian disaster. Ukraine is an invasion to seize territory and is largely being waged against the civilian population.
You still haven't answered these questions relating to your "America manipulated Russia into invading Ukraine in order to destroy Russia" as part of "the most preplanned and logical thing ever" theory. See page 535.
-------
Reposted from page 535:
Your theory is that the US has manipulated Russia (Putin) into invading Ukraine so that the US could respond, via Ukraine, and escalate and eventually overthrow Putin and destroy and/or occupy Russia.
Do Putin and his advisors now know how badly they got played into participating in their own destruction? Why were they so naive and gullible to have fallen for this trap? Don't they know that the US played the same trick in WWII (Pearl Harbor)?
Why did the US use Ukraine as the middleman? Wouldn't it have been easier and faster to just make Putin invade Latvia or Lithuania, which are NATO members (article 5 easy to invoke) that already have US weapons ready to go?
What do you know about the US timetable for accomplishing all this and destroying Russia? Roughly 4-5 years like with WWII?
Of course they did. Just like Russians manipulated the US into attacking Cuba in the 60's.
Putin and his advisors saw the Western hostility increase over the past 10-20 years which led to a decision of taking Crimea and Donbas before NATO could do so. I say the only surprise was the lack of support from China and India.
Latvia and Lithuania were long lost to NATO and Russia wouldn't want to get involved in a full scale war. Whereas Ukraine's a non-member and NATO can't send in it's troops.
This war can go either way. Russia will win if Russian civilians will keep playing along and sacrifice themselves in large numbers on battlefields, just like during WWII. Russia will lose if Russian civilians won't play along and will topple the government.
I'm geing as generous as possible while politely calling out your analogy.
Kosovo was an intervention to stop genocide and a humanitarian disaster. Ukraine is an invasion to seize territory and is largely being waged against the civilian population.
What? In Ukraine it's all about protecting Donbas from genocide and humanitarian disaster too.
On Wikipedia you can look up the numbers of Ukrainian citizens from LPR and DPR killed by Ukrainian regular army.
I'm geing as generous as possible while politely calling out your analogy.
Kosovo was an intervention to stop genocide and a humanitarian disaster. Ukraine is an invasion to seize territory and is largely being waged against the civilian population.
What? In Ukraine it's all about protecting Donbas from genocide and humanitarian disaster too.
On Wikipedia you can look up the numbers of Ukrainian citizens from LPR and DPR killed by Ukrainian regular army.
According to independent UN investigators, 77 civilians died from military related fatalities in the last three years, mostly from mines and unexploded ordinance. More died from car crashes in Moscow than that.
The myth that the UA was shelling civilians is a big fat lie promulgated by Putin. In fact it was a danger to his ambitions that a de facto truce had occurred, which is untenable to his ambitions.
What? In Ukraine it's all about protecting Donbas from genocide and humanitarian disaster too.
On Wikipedia you can look up the numbers of Ukrainian citizens from LPR and DPR killed by Ukrainian regular army.
According to independent UN investigators, 77 civilians died from military related fatalities in the last three years, mostly from mines and unexploded ordinance. More died from car crashes in Moscow than that.
The myth that the UA was shelling civilians is a big fat lie promulgated by Putin. In fact it was a danger to his ambitions that a de facto truce had occurred, which is untenable to his ambitions.
Wow. Did not realize the woke libs had so much disdain for human life. Completely disregarding the damage Ukraine has done in Donbas for 8 years. 77? "independent UN investigators"? Wow. Most of the western citings state at least 14,000 dead with others, likely more accurate stating much more. This is besides the horrific conditions created for the people there. Just wow
You still haven't answered these questions relating to your "America manipulated Russia into invading Ukraine in order to destroy Russia" as part of "the most preplanned and logical thing ever" theory. See page 535.
-------
Reposted from page 535:
Your theory is that the US has manipulated Russia (Putin) into invading Ukraine so that the US could respond, via Ukraine, and escalate and eventually overthrow Putin and destroy and/or occupy Russia.
Do Putin and his advisors now know how badly they got played into participating in their own destruction? Why were they so naive and gullible to have fallen for this trap? Don't they know that the US played the same trick in WWII (Pearl Harbor)?
Why did the US use Ukraine as the middleman? Wouldn't it have been easier and faster to just make Putin invade Latvia or Lithuania, which are NATO members (article 5 easy to invoke) that already have US weapons ready to go?
What do you know about the US timetable for accomplishing all this and destroying Russia? Roughly 4-5 years like with WWII?
Of course they did. Just like Russians manipulated the US into attacking Cuba in the 60's.
Putin and his advisors saw the Western hostility increase over the past 10-20 years which led to a decision of taking Crimea and Donbas before NATO could do so. I say the only surprise was the lack of support from China and India.
Latvia and Lithuania were long lost to NATO and Russia wouldn't want to get involved in a full scale war. Whereas Ukraine's a non-member and NATO can't send in it's troops.
This war can go either way. Russia will win if Russian civilians will keep playing along and sacrifice themselves in large numbers on battlefields, just like during WWII. Russia will lose if Russian civilians won't play along and will topple the government.
You're now saying Russia does possess quite significant independent decision making abilities on which countries they want to invade and which they don't want to invade. I agree with that thought of yours, however temporary it may be.
According to independent UN investigators, 77 civilians died from military related fatalities in the last three years, mostly from mines and unexploded ordinance. More died from car crashes in Moscow than that.
The myth that the UA was shelling civilians is a big fat lie promulgated by Putin. In fact it was a danger to his ambitions that a de facto truce had occurred, which is untenable to his ambitions.
Wow. Did not realize the woke libs had so much disdain for human life. Completely disregarding the damage Ukraine has done in Donbas for 8 years. 77? "independent UN investigators"? Wow. Most of the western citings state at least 14,000 dead with others, likely more accurate stating much more. This is besides the horrific conditions created for the people there. Just wow
I noticed you cited no sources. And, your 14,000 number is often cited for the last EIGHT years, not last THREE years, as XY clearly stated. Making things worse for you, many of those 14,000 were LNR/DNR forces. Of the remainder, roughly half were killed by Russian-supported forces - like the 298 citizens on MH17.
Didn't I post on this thread 2 or 3 days ago Ukraine needs to negotiate a way out of this? I just read a day and a half of posts. Not one post from you or the other pro-Ukrainian fanatics stating an Ukrainian victory is near. Since Ukraine has no plan to produce a Russian Unconditional Surrender, why is Prez Z getting up every morning and fighting a war for C.I.A. and U.S. State Department? U.S. D.o.D. never wanted this war and doesn't want this war. We recall from a year ago Congressperson Jackie Spierer (sp) wanted this war. To date: U.S. D.o.D. has turned u.s. chicken-hawks down for their request for No Fly Zone. To date: D.o.D. turned Biden down for modern tanks to Ukraine. To date: No U.S. regulars (non-special forces infantry battalions). It's impossible for Ukraine to win War of Attrition versus Russia. What do you pro-Ukrainian fanatics believe will occur? Do not bother posting about territory anymore. Clearly Russia is fighting a Body Count War. Don't respond by telling me Body Count Warfare is mean. This can all stop if President Z stops listening to C.I.A. and U.S. State Dept. Why isn't President Z putting the people of Ukraine first?
Wow. Did not realize the woke libs had so much disdain for human life. Completely disregarding the damage Ukraine has done in Donbas for 8 years. 77? "independent UN investigators"? Wow. Most of the western citings state at least 14,000 dead with others, likely more accurate stating much more. This is besides the horrific conditions created for the people there. Just wow
I noticed you cited no sources. And, your 14,000 number is often cited for the last EIGHT years, not last THREE years, as XY clearly stated. Making things worse for you, many of those 14,000 were LNR/DNR forces. Of the remainder, roughly half were killed by Russian-supported forces - like the 298 citizens on MH17.
Sources? Lol. Neither did this guy. Just effin google it. Thats what you do. This conflict has not been going on for the last three years so what the hell limit to three years??? Many of those LNR/DNR "forces" are civilians!! You know, like a civilian militia! Are you really trying to minimize life loss?? you're despicable!
I noticed you cited no sources. And, your 14,000 number is often cited for the last EIGHT years, not last THREE years, as XY clearly stated. Making things worse for you, many of those 14,000 were LNR/DNR forces. Of the remainder, roughly half were killed by Russian-supported forces - like the 298 citizens on MH17.
Sources? Lol. Neither did this guy. Just effin google it. Thats what you do. This conflict has not been going on for the last three years so what the hell limit to three years??? Many of those LNR/DNR "forces" are civilians!! You know, like a civilian militia! Are you really trying to minimize life loss?? you're despicable!
Ok, I googled it and found that over the last 8 years Russian supported separatists have killed more civilians in the Donbas than Ukrainian forces and that the overwhelming majority of these civilian deaths occurred in the first 5 years of the conflict. I also found that Russian shelling has killed far more civilians in the last 10 months than were killed in the last 8 years. Finally, I found that there are far more Nazis in Russia than in Ukraine. It sounds like Russia should have invaded themselves.
p.s. Putin is the one that seems entirely unconcerned with the 70,000 dead Russian soldiers that he is responsible for.
Didn't I post on this thread 2 or 3 days ago Ukraine needs to negotiate a way out of this? I just read a day and a half of posts. Not one post from you or the other pro-Ukrainian fanatics stating a Ukrainian victory is near. Since Ukraine has no plan to produce a Russian Unconditional Surrender, why is Prez Z getting up every morning and fighting a war for C.I.A. and U.S. State Department? U.S. D.o.D. never wanted this war and doesn't want this war. We recall from a year ago Congressperson Jackie Spierer (sp) wanted this war. To date: U.S. D.o.D. has turned u.s. chicken-hawks down for their request for No Fly Zone. To date: D.o.D. turned Biden down for modern tanks to Ukraine. To date: No U.S. regulars (non-special forces infantry battalions). It's impossible for Ukraine to win War of Attrition versus Russia. What do you pro-Ukrainian fanatics believe will occur? Do not bother posting about territory anymore. Clearly Russia is fighting a Body Count War. Don't respond by telling me Body Count Warfare is mean. This can all stop if President Z stops listening to C.I.A. and U.S. State Dept. Why isn't President Z putting the people of Ukraine first?
He is you f*cking monkey. Since Russia is hell bent on committing genocide, it seems prudent for Zelensky to do whatever it takes to prevent Russia from succeeding.
How many Russian soldiers is Putin willing to sacrifice to lose territory week-by-week? Do you think Putin will have an accident before or after Russia is booted from Crimea?
Sources? Lol. Neither did this guy. Just effin google it. Thats what you do. This conflict has not been going on for the last three years so what the hell limit to three years??? Many of those LNR/DNR "forces" are civilians!! You know, like a civilian militia! Are you really trying to minimize life loss?? you're despicable!
Ok, I googled it and found that over the last 8 years Russian supported separatists have killed more civilians in the Donbas than Ukrainian forces and that the overwhelming majority of these civilian deaths occurred in the first 5 years of the conflict. I also found that Russian shelling has killed far more civilians in the last 10 months than were killed in the last 8 years. Finally, I found that there are far more Nazis in Russia than in Ukraine. It sounds like Russia should have invaded themselves.
p.s. Putin is the one that seems entirely unconcerned with the 70,000 dead Russian soldiers that he is responsible for.
Try Google, not liberal uberfukgoogle. Perhaps you will finally realize the damage and murder incurred by Ukraine since 2014. If we are to continue with the cartoon-like information you're providing then you, Zelensky, and the rest of the woke outrage army seem to even more unconcerned about the 40,000,000 Ukrainian soldiers that have died.
To date: U.S. D.o.D. has turned u.s. chicken-hawks down for their request for No Fly Zone. To date: D.o.D. turned Biden down for modern tanks to Ukraine. To date: No U.S. regulars (non-special forces infantry battalions). It's impossible for Ukraine to win War of Attrition versus Russia. What do you pro-Ukrainian fanatics believe will occur? Do not bother posting about territory anymore. Clearly Russia is fighting a Body Count War. Don't respond by telling me Body Count Warfare is mean. This can all stop if President Z stops listening to C.I.A. and U.S. State Dept. Why isn't President Z putting the people of Ukraine first?
To date: dozens of HIMARS and related rocket artillery systems sent to Ukraine that Russia can't touch. Have you seen what happens when the missiles land - exactly on target after a flight of 25 miles? First there's a Russian tank unit or artillery emplacement, and then POOF POOF POOF it's all gone, all the equipment is ruined and all the Russians are dead. It's absolutely devastating and Russia can do nothing to stop it.
To date: hundreds of 155 mm artillery pieces and hundreds of thousands of shells, including thousands of Excalibur rounds. When they air burst precisely on target, whole trenches full of Russian soldiers go from alive to dead. Tanks cook off, sending their turrets flying dozens of meters into the air. No exaggeration, it's all been recorded on video many, many times. Over 8500 documented losses of heavy weapons.
And this is all with NATO cast-offs and a small fraction of its military budget. The NATO economies can in fact keep this up for a very long time just for the LOLs and the sheer entertainment value. When you're trying to attack deeply fortified defenders like Russia is doing, you have to have a massive advantage in numbers and artillery and Russia hasn't had that since June. A recently escaped Ukrainian who was forced into the Russian army reports that he dug as many as 55 bodies or parts of bodies of Russian soldiers out of just 30 meters of trench.
It's also amply documented what happens when Russia is allowed to take over. If Russia attacks, you can risk your life to defend your home, or you can hope that the Russian soldiers won't rape you too often, won't kidnap all of your children, won't torture the ones who are left too long, and won't make your suffering last indefinitely before they kill you.
You and the other trolls have made your choice about what you would do in that situation. If the rest of us find your choice both ludicrous and disgusting, I'm sure you can figure out why. The Ukrainians are showing that not everyone will live as a coward and a traitor, and you can't bear the shame.
Important to know just how crazed the minds of the pro-Putin posters on LRC are
+1.
Post-WW2, what good has Russia ever contributed to the world? I've never seen a "made in Russia" product in any store I've been to, and I can't think of any positive thing that has come out of that country within the past few decades. How often do you watch Russian movies? Read Russian books? Buy stuff from Russian companies? Heck, even a good portion of Russian athletes are doped. Now Ukraine hasn't really produced much either, but at least Ukrainians aren't invading other countries and threatening nuclear war.
The world would be much better off without Russia. All they have to offer is oil, authoritarianism, and world destruction, and there are plenty of alternative options for the first one.
Many Russian people have lots to offer. Just like other people whose leaders chose invasion, be they German, Japanese, or USAmerican. That said, wars of aggression are hateful endeavors, and anyone who believes otherwise does indeed have little to offer.