me too, agreed wrote:
beenthere wrote:if you lost 28 lbs. in 4 weeks, a large portion of that had to be muscle. thats a 3500 calorie deficit a day!
I was lifting 3 days a week, 15 reps at 60% of max on 5 upper body/5 lower body exercises, followed by a 4 mile walk over a hilly course. 6 days a week I was either riding 30 miles on my bike or running 5 miles.
I worked out in the morning, which helped to depress any hunger pangs I had. I usually ate my one meal in the early evening. I went from 193 to 165 between June 3 and July 4. Considering my lifting weights did increase by an average of 10% I doubt I lost any muscle weight.
me too.....I did the same thing....I lost 20 lbs, in less than a month by eating chicken, fish and vegetables....i walked/jogged for at least 45 minutes a day and lifted weights at a gyym 3 times a week; so I lost no muscle either.
Quit making excuses for Henry. He needs to 'beat this weight thing' before it does-in his knees, which are starting to bother him.[/quote]
With Henry running 2+ hours a day I don't think one meal is a good idea....
This is what I did while gradually increasing my mileage.
I ate the same number of meals each day.
I merely reduced the amount I ate by 1/2.
The way I did this was to eat a small breakfast;
For lunch I ate filled my plate as normal, THEN I took 1/2 of the food and put it in another plate and put that in the refrigerator. I ate the 1/2 for lunch and the other 1/2 for the evening meal. No snacking other than an apple or 2 per day. There is something in apples that does a good job of satisfying hunger pangs...
The first week I lost a pound. Each week after that I lost 1.5 to 2 pounds.
I feel that this would work better for a 2 hour per day runner, Henry.
Henry, congratulations you are a letsrun.com star! Looks like you will be the "letsrun poster of the year". You deserve it!