Serious thread about election fraud

What would an audit entail? What information would you gain or even have access to? Anonymity would obviously have to be protected etc. You can't just come in screaming "we need to see the logs!!" with no idea what you are even looking for. Who are these non-biased 3rd parties that would examine such audit? Aren't their already bipartisan groups that oversee elections at county and state level? Do we just ignore all the in-place safeguards and protocols because you lost? You sound like Kasparov after the Deep Blue loss. LMAO. At least he realized the stupidity of his conspiracies.

ohhh Yeahhh wrote:

Harambe wrote:

Nah, here in the US we are very adamant that refusal to submit to search or interrogation is not admission of guilt.

You sound very unAmerican, my friend.

Let me get this straight? You believe we should have voting machines that shouldn't be audited by non biased 3rd parties cause that would be unamerican? Please answer that yes or no if you can? That's the answer to everything with this discussion with you.

If you want fraud, let's have some unaudited software counting our votes. Nothing could ever go wrong there......

Being American = Transparent Elections.

If you don't get that, then this is pointless, with you at least.

Also, forgive me, but haven't the machines already been audited?

https://sos.ga.gov/index.php/elections/secretary_raffensperger_announces_completion_of_voting_machine_audit_using_forensic_techniques_no_sign_of_foul_play

But I thought the SCOTUS was going to change the election. Is ACB deep state?

Harambe wrote:

I think it is fishy that the losing party of an election wants to audit machines ONLY in a state they narrowly lost.

I think you are mad that the feds can't strongarm a state into doing their bidding because they are mad about an election. Like I said to someone else, feel free to move to a country with more centralized power :).

The Feds have NOTHING to do with this. He shouldn't have to "strongarm" his own party? right?

You refuse to answer my question.

Why doesn't a Rep GA Gov let his own party make sure the voting machines are not being tampered with?

You refuse to answer. Cause the answer is very obvious. Which is ok, I know you don't want to admit it.

You also realize that machines can be messed with even during an election. So why wouldn't the REPUBLICAN Governor make sure his own president wasn't screwed over by the opposing party during that election night?

You won't answer again, I know. Intellectually dishonest.

Are you arguing that Georgia officials should be more loyal to their political party than their state?

That's.... an interesting take.

You realize that state governments are not just extensions of the national party?

Google "federalism"

And like I posted earlier, it looks like the machines were already audited by a 3rd party... what are you angry about again?

Well, you and dumbbutts like Trump thought so. But anyone with common sense knows that courts are NOT going to change the election. They want that to be done in the houses in the states.

The SCOTUS didn't turn down Texas's lawsuit due to evidence, but because they are not going to get involved as they think it isn't their job.

ohhh Yeahhh wrote:

Well, you and dumbbutts like Trump thought so. But anyone with common sense knows that courts are NOT going to change the election. They want that to be done in the houses in the states.

The SCOTUS didn't turn down Texas's lawsuit due to evidence, but because they are not going to get involved as they think it isn't their job.

Ahh... ok so ALL the state legislatures are corrupt and conspired to get rid of Trump.

But he is dumb? So you're glad about this?

I can't even figure out what you want anymore. It's just rage

What evidence do you have that the machines were tampered with? Wouldn't the recounts have confirmed that no votes were changed or injected into the totals.

2600 bro wrote:

What would an audit entail? What information would you gain or even have access to? Anonymity would obviously have to be protected etc.

You can't just come in screaming "we need to see the logs!!" with no idea what you are even looking for. Who are these non-biased 3rd parties that would examine such audit? Aren't their already bipartisan groups that oversee elections at county and state level? Do we just ignore all the in-place safeguards and protocols because you lost?

You sound like Kasparov after the Deep Blue loss. LMAO. At least he realized the stupidity of his conspiracies.

Leave Kasparov out of this, he is freaking amazing!

Let me answer your questions and then like everyone else, ignore mine.

What would an audit entail? -

1. Match the signatures to the ballots. Simple. All ballot information is required by law to be kept for up to around 18 months after the election.

2. Make sure all legal ballots were casted. Up to 200,000 were said to be not legal in GA by the Amistad project. And they have the proof (which a court will refuse to see due to standing).

3. Forensic audit of the machines. Many 3rd party companies have the ability to do this and was already done in Michigan. In which, they came back and said the machines are extremely susceptible to fraud. Michigan refuses to release the logs.

What information would you gain or even have access to? -

Nothing more than what is needed to case a ballot. If a voters ballot information (citizen, status, age, etc) isn't available to be audited, then that is not a transparent election. That is just common sense.

Do we just ignore all the in-place safeguards and protocols because you lost? I have no idea what you mean by this. Having a transparent election is having safe guards. If you think every election should never be audited, then I dont know what to say. Good luck with your Blue Pills.

Aren't their already bipartisan groups that oversee elections at county and state level?

It wasn't done in every county. It was only done massively in the final swing states. Read the Amistad projects reports on it. I am sure you won't.

Now answer why a Republican Governor won't make sure his own president wasn't screwed over by those evil democrats and do a simple transparent audit. Not the BS recount of BS ballots like before?

DiscoGary wrote:

Uh. That's exactly what happened with Democrat accusations of stolen elections and the Mueller investigation for the last 4 years.

Sadly. THAT is how America works, but only when Republicans are the target.

Gary,

I will not get deep into this as I have posted dozens and dozens of times on this thread providing documentation of facts with most posts. However, I cannot read this falsehood posted by you for the 5th time without responding.

Mueller said that there was overwhelming evidence of Trump and Russian collusion but his job was only to uncover it and the DOJ and senate to pursue it. The DOJ responded by Barr redacting anything and everything that showed Trump's involvement with Russia. This is estimated at 30% of the entire report that no one has seen to this day, outside of Barr. Trump then refused to testify, which could have cleared his name. Trump then would not allow white house staff to testify in any way, which could have cleared his name. Trump also smeared and attempted to professionally injure those in the military who tesified under oath of his involvement.

The GOP can release the unredacted Mueller report, and only then can we talk. Until, please read the facts instead of parrotting Trump that there is no evidence.

I explicitly referred to the Federal case in Wisconsin where the trial judge, Ludwig, allowed Trump's attorneys to present evidence to support their claims. Your attempted refutation of my post is referring to the opinion of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The Supreme Court's decision was on appeal from a state trial court, not the Federal court.

Hey, what about the videos where vote totals changed live on air? Votes subtracted in real time on network TV? Explain.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

ohhh Yeahhh wrote:

The Feds have NOTHING to do with this. He shouldn't have to "strongarm" his own party? right?

You refuse to answer my question.

Why doesn't a Rep GA Gov let his own party make sure the voting machines are not being tampered with?

You refuse to answer. Cause the answer is very obvious. Which is ok, I know you don't want to admit it.

You also realize that machines can be messed with even during an election. So why wouldn't the REPUBLICAN Governor make sure his own president wasn't screwed over by the opposing party during that election night?

You won't answer again, I know. Intellectually dishonest.

What evidence do you have that the machines were tampered with? Wouldn't the recounts have confirmed that no votes were changed or injected into the totals.

I will answer your question, but again, why won't you answer my simple question. The fact you think a Republican Governor, who is deep with China, wouldn't want to screw over Trump (who goes out of his way to screw China) is not corrupt is blue pilled as heck.

The Michigan forensics report of the dominion machine is way more than enough. Besides the fact that votes were "glitched" (now that's a joke). And many other reasons my fingers are tired of typing haha.

Why a Republican Governor wouldn't make sure the evil democrats are not messing with his machines is the real question you should be asking, but you won't, cause you hate the one guy all politicians hate. Which tells you what side you really are on. And I think Trump sucks, but I am for darn not believing any politicians more than I can hit him in the ....

Harambe wrote:

stanky legs wrote:

Fraud occurred. Nothing new. Biden was determined to be the next POTUS .

Oh ok, I was told for weeks the election was on the cusp of being overturned.

I was told the Earth was flat.

ohhh Yeahhh wrote:

3. Forensic audit of the machines. Many 3rd party companies have the ability to do this and was already done in Michigan. In which, they came back and said the machines are extremely susceptible to fraud. Michigan refuses to release the logs.

This has already been done I recently discovered.

As has a signature matching audit:

So yeah... uhhh... what are you mad about?

Lin Wood has a theory on why they don't want to look into anything except superficially. Read up on it. Internal voting company audit not equal to external audit, wouldn't you admit?

Say, why did Kelp post a photoshop of himself at the Christmas party? That was weird. Anyone know? Was he trolling?

Yes, Little Johnny, Newsmax is a source that we should ALL listen to.

Harambe wrote:

ohhh Yeahhh wrote:

Well, you and dumbbutts like Trump thought so. But anyone with common sense knows that courts are NOT going to change the election. They want that to be done in the houses in the states.

The SCOTUS didn't turn down Texas's lawsuit due to evidence, but because they are not going to get involved as they think it isn't their job.

Ahh... ok so ALL the state legislatures are corrupt and conspired to get rid of Trump.

But he is dumb? So you're glad about this?

I can't even figure out what you want anymore. It's just rage

First of all, nothing is ever ALL. But YES, most politicians are corrupt. I hope you know that.

And this wasn't done in all states, but only in the few counties that they needed to do it. And you only need a few people to get it done. It's not complicated.

Yes, Trump is dumb. He does a lot of dumb stuff. He just passed the stupid pork bill even though the vast majority of his voters didn't want him to. Why, cause politicians are not for the people. You and everyone should know that.

I am glad Trump is out as he isn't an effective leader. But Biden is much worse too, so it doesn't freaking matter.

And you think the Rep Gov who received MILLIONS of dollars from the GOP is way way way more loyal to GA than his own party is funnnnnny!! Money talks man....dang. The GOP doesn't want Trump around, I hope you know that.

Harambe wrote:

...

As has a signature matching audit:

..

One cherry picked county. Not the one where it was needed.

Internal voting company audit not the same as external audit.