Republican State Secretary Brad Raffensperger welcomed the result, saying: "Georgia’s historic first statewide audit reaffirmed that the state’s new secure paper ballot voting system accurately counted and reported results."
Oh wait, they WENT to court and got slapped like 50 times.
Oh well. I guess the framers are sleeping well tonight :D
Trump supporters have really good reason to be made at the Repub. party, granted. Where are they when you need them? And now they want us to go ahead and vote on the very same rigged voting machines in Georgia? LOL.
yes yes yes yes wrote:
Trump supporters have really good reason to be made at the Repub. party, granted. Where are they when you need them? And now they want us to go ahead and vote on the very same rigged voting machines in Georgia? LOL.
By all means, boycott the runoff! That'll show everyone
ohhh Yeahhh wrote:
Johnny Johnny, please tell me you are not that naive!
That was not an audit. That was a recount of the same corrupt and fraudulent ballots.
Did you even read the article.
"The recount in Georgia will tell us nothing, because these fraudulent ballots will just be counted again because they wouldn't supply the signatures to match the ballots. So it means nothing to count these ballots," said Giuliani, who once served as the mayor of New York.
Johnny, please answer this. Why won't they let them do an actual 3rd party audit of the voting machines and/or the signature verifications? It's a Rep. Governor, please tell me why not? It is makes everyone happy and there is no fraud, why not? I hope you answer....but you probably won't.
You're taking a quote from Giuliani to support your argument? Not only was he once a mayor, he farted during a presentation to state legislatures, leaked some brown liquid down his face during a press conference, held another press conference in front of a landscaping company and is shown in a scene from a movie with his hand down his pants.
How about a quote from Sidney Powell or Giuliani's drunken star witness?
Harambe wrote:
ohhh Yeahhh wrote:
You honestly believe that a Rep Gov won't do a cursory audit for the president of the United States cause he "feels" he shouldn't?
They are from the same party. At the very least, COMMON SENSE, he would be to let them do it and let if fail. BUT he won't.
That's like not letting your GF check your phone to see if your cheating. Sure, you may not be, but you better let her check or it's fishhhhhy.
Damn, you are beyond naive.
Just like I wouldn't let a cop search my car or my house just because they asked. That's like rule #1!
If you have a problem with federalism I suggest you dig up Alexander Hamilton and talk to him or something.
Again, I think it is GOOD that random states don't give in to the whims of butthurt feds. That is balance of power working. Go to court if you disagree.
Your analogy makes no sense. You and the cop are on OPPOSITE sides of the equation.
The Rep Gov and the Rep Pres are on the SAME side of the equation.
Just like you and your GF should be on the same side of the cheating equation.
And there were many reasons to be suspicious, but at the very least, for TRANSPARANCY (the hallmark of an actual non-rigged election), you do a audit to make your party's leader happy.
You get that don't you?
Or you really believe the GA Gov is thinking no reason even if I know it will give everyone in my own party relief that it wasn't stolen?
Or you are just being intellectually dishonest? Maybe all of the above.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
ohhh Yeahhh wrote:
Johnny Johnny, please tell me you are not that naive!
That was not an audit. That was a recount of the same corrupt and fraudulent ballots.
Did you even read the article.
"The recount in Georgia will tell us nothing, because these fraudulent ballots will just be counted again because they wouldn't supply the signatures to match the ballots. So it means nothing to count these ballots," said Giuliani, who once served as the mayor of New York.
Johnny, please answer this. Why won't they let them do an actual 3rd party audit of the voting machines and/or the signature verifications? It's a Rep. Governor, please tell me why not? It is makes everyone happy and there is no fraud, why not? I hope you answer....but you probably won't.
You're taking a quote from Giuliani to support your argument? Not only was he once a mayor, he farted during a presentation to state legislatures, leaked some brown liquid down his face during a press conference, held another press conference in front of a landscaping company and is shown in a scene from a movie with his hand down his pants.
How about a quote from Sidney Powell or Giuliani's drunken star witness?
Yes I know you don't get this, but regardless of who the quote is from, it is the truth.
The things they wanted actually audited were not audited. But go ahead and talk about nonsense.
Harambe wrote:
Oh wait, they WENT to court and got slapped like 50 times.
Oh well. I guess the framers are sleeping well tonight :D
They only had around 7 court cases, but I am sure you knew that already.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
ohhh Yeahhh wrote:
Johnny Johnny, please tell me you are not that naive!
That was not an audit. That was a recount of the same corrupt and fraudulent ballots.
Did you even read the article.
"The recount in Georgia will tell us nothing, because these fraudulent ballots will just be counted again because they wouldn't supply the signatures to match the ballots. So it means nothing to count these ballots," said Giuliani, who once served as the mayor of New York.
Johnny, please answer this. Why won't they let them do an actual 3rd party audit of the voting machines and/or the signature verifications? It's a Rep. Governor, please tell me why not? It is makes everyone happy and there is no fraud, why not? I hope you answer....but you probably won't.
You're taking a quote from Giuliani to support your argument? Not only was he once a mayor, he farted during a presentation to state legislatures, leaked some brown liquid down his face during a press conference, held another press conference in front of a landscaping company and is shown in a scene from a movie with his hand down his pants.
How about a quote from Sidney Powell or Giuliani's drunken star witness?
The election was free and fair. And if you don't like it, you can bring it to the Supreme Courtyard Marriot
* I didn't make that one up, though there's a lot of things being made up going around these days.
Harambe wrote:
...
Because the feds don't get to randomly rip apart the election process without evidence? Sorry dude this is how America works.
...
Uh. That's exactly what happened with Democrat accusations of stolen elections and the Mueller investigation for the last 4 years.
Sadly. THAT is how America works, but only when Republicans are the target.
Look. There isn't going to be any investigation, no Special Counsel, no justice of any kind for Republicans no matter what happens. So it's left up to us, the People, to look into what happened and determine if our representative republic is still functioning. You have nothing to be afraid of. People like me looking for answers have no power at all, and we'll have even less after Kamala is done with us.
But you should be just a teensy bit curious if our electoral system has been compromised, because some day it might occur to you that the monster you've unleashed to take me out may some day be at your door... and then you'll wish elections were working so you could get rid of it.
ohhh Yeahhh wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Oh wait, they WENT to court and got slapped like 50 times.
Oh well. I guess the framers are sleeping well tonight :D
They only had around 7 court cases, but I am sure you knew that already.
7, but only if you round that up to 50.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/trump-s-election-fight-includes-over-30-lawsuits-it-s-n1248289johnny99 wrote:
Republican State Secretary Brad Raffensperger welcomed the result, saying: "Georgia’s historic first statewide audit reaffirmed that the state’s new secure paper ballot voting system accurately counted and reported results."
Again, the things they wanted actually audited, WAS NOT audited. Man....
Why do you keep repeating things from corrupt Rep politicians who don't want people to think they suck at their job.
And all the people who wanted Trump to lose actually believe politicians can't be bought. haha. Amazing.
ohhh Yeahhh wrote:
johnny99 wrote:
Republican State Secretary Brad Raffensperger welcomed the result, saying: "Georgia’s historic first statewide audit reaffirmed that the state’s new secure paper ballot voting system accurately counted and reported results."
Again, the things they wanted actually audited, WAS NOT audited. Man....
Why do you keep repeating things from corrupt Rep politicians who don't want people to think they suck at their job.
And all the people who wanted Trump to lose actually believe politicians can't be bought. haha. Amazing.
Of course, because if you wanted to confirm the accuracy of an election, why would you audit the actual ballots? That wouldn't make any sense at all, now would it?
the beagle wrote:
baa baa wool wrote:
Maybe based on this “serious” thread that produced f!ck all support.
Precisely. Continually claiming “LOADS of evidence” doesn’t will such into existence.
Reposted for emphasis.
ohhh Yeahhh wrote:
Your analogy makes no sense. You and the cop are on OPPOSITE sides of the equation.
The Rep Gov and the Rep Pres are on the SAME side of the equation.
Just like you and your GF should be on the same side of the cheating equation.
And there were many reasons to be suspicious, but at the very least, for TRANSPARANCY (the hallmark of an actual non-rigged election), you do a audit to make your party's leader happy.
You get that don't you?
Or you really believe the GA Gov is thinking no reason even if I know it will give everyone in my own party relief that it wasn't stolen?
Or you are just being intellectually dishonest? Maybe all of the above.
Maybe he is more loyal to his own state than a political party! (gasp)
I wouldn't want the feds ripping things apart for no reason, just as I wouldn't want the cops doing it to my car.
I have no doubt if the gov. had real evidence of irregularities he would be leading the audit.
Again, you seem to have big issues with federalism.
I suggest 1) getting the vaccine and 2) leaving to another country with more centralized power
How is all that winning working out for you?
So no one will be talking about covid after election day??
Serious discussion about election fraud? 1-49 record in courts.
When will you realize trump is conning you about everything?
He made a fools out of millions!
johnny99 wrote:
ohhh Yeahhh wrote:
They only had around 7 court cases, but I am sure you knew that already.
7, but only if you round that up to 50.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/trump-s-election-fight-includes-over-30-lawsuits-it-s-n1248289
Again, did you actually read the article?
I said Trump and HIS legal team has only had around 7.
There are many others who believe the election was fraudulent who has filed as well. And many of those are NOT Trump supports such as the Amistad project, but I am sure you know that.
trumpisasadloser wrote:
How is all that winning working out for you?
So no one will be talking about covid after election day??
Serious discussion about election fraud? 1-49 record in courts.
When will you realize trump is conning you about everything?
He made a fools out of millions!
I am afraid this is the absolute truth. Trump used his followers for his own advancement. Time to face this obvious conclusion, which goes a long way to explaining things that can't otherwise be logically explained.
Harambe wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
There has been no government run investigation into fraud claims despite the fact that there is way more evidence than they had to begin the Mueller investigation.
See this is where your Soviet-style whataboutism falls apart. There's no evidence of election fraud that has withstood more than a day of public scrutiny. You WANT this to be the case, but it's not.
I'm sorry man...
What public scrutiny? Accusations of election fraud are being censored. The media isn't pursuing it. The cases are not being tried in court so people can not be called to explain their actions. Damn near every Democrat I run across refuses to even consider the possibility that election fraud effected this election.
What have you "scrutinized"? I'm betting you don't know one tenth of what happened.
I WANT our elections to be fair, but from what I've seen, we are now a Banana Republic.
DiscoGary wrote:
Uh. That's exactly what happened with Democrat accusations of stolen elections and the Mueller investigation for the last 4 years.
Sadly. THAT is how America works, but only when Republicans are the target.
Look. There isn't going to be any investigation, no Special Counsel, no justice of any kind for Republicans no matter what happens. So it's left up to us, the People, to look into what happened and determine if our representative republic is still functioning. You have nothing to be afraid of. People like me looking for answers have no power at all, and we'll have even less after Kamala is done with us.
But you should be just a teensy bit curious if our electoral system has been compromised, because some day it might occur to you that the monster you've unleashed to take me out may some day be at your door... and then you'll wish elections were working so you could get rid of it.
There have been 50+ cases presented to the courts already. How is that not "justice."
It is only "justice" if the result satisfies your priors. I get it :)
I am curious about election integrity! I have seen the data presented so far and it's pitiful. I hope, for your sake, there are some bombshells lying in wait... hehe