pointer outer wrote:
Maybe you can use your Soros money to pay for some online math classes so that you can learn to identify the relative size of numbers.
In the under 60 group, the daily death rates for the vaccinated without validity (fully vaccinated by most definitions) are roughly double the unvaccinated. The severe hospitalization rates are essentially the same. in those groups. The most recent infection rates are highest in the boosted group.
A few gross errors in your innumerate post:
1) The severe case rates for under 60 are exceptionally. Unvaccinated under 60 are currently at 4.8/100k and over 60 are at 411/100k.
100 fold difference.
So, there's a lot of noise at the bottom that is confusing you. Understandable. This kind of signal processing is a common pitfall.
2) Regardless, you are still just misinterpreting the data. Even for the under 60s, the vaccinated group is hospitalized currently at 1.7/100k vs 4.8/100k for unvaxxed. Still good protection even though both numbers are effectively down at baseline compared to the over 60s.
3) Deaths show a similar trend. Protection is exceedingly obvious for the over 60s while deaths for under 60s are extremely rare. All the signal is right near 0, with a single death enough move the needle. Anyone drawing conclusions from a handful of deaths in the last month has an agenda.
4) "vaccinated without validity" means several things but the largest part of this group are unboosted people. We know 3 shots is far superior but even unboosted people are doing better than the unvaxxed
5) Choosing to look at only under 60s (low signal to noise) and unboosted (ignoring the most effective vaccine course that's been acknowledged for 6+ months) is such blatant cherry picking that you're a diabetes risk. Do better, my friend.
Another W for Harambe