jesseriley wrote:
Full disclosure, you’re an anonymous troll. People die every day from stupidity or from attempting to kill others or from the abuse or neglect of idiot leaders. Whole civilizations have been wiped out.
Right now, less people in Germany are meeting their “demise.”
Nice response. Very much expected. Completely ad hominem and lacking in introspection.
Once again, seek help. You'll be better for it.
jamin wrote:
82 / day means a less than 4% increase in average deaths per day, a very minor bump that is expected during a season when a disease is spreading around.
The real National Emergency is a couple miles from us, on Sand Point Way, children dying of an uncurable disease that over 50% of us will get sometime in our lives, a 70% mortality rate over 5 years and 52% percent mortality rate over 10 years.
Incredible numbers! An extra 18% of the total (over 25% of the dead!) are alive again 5 years later? We may just have a zombie problem on our hands.
We are spending billions, probably trillions annually researching, treating and fighting cancer. It probably doesn’t help when half of our politicians are relaxing environment regulations on things we know to cause cancer.
Also, if my two mins trying to really understand the mindset of ‘Jamin’ was successful, those numbers are 5 and 10 year ‘survival’ rates. That’s the general opposite of ‘mortality.’ Also, I know some people love to cite co-morbidities to minimize Covid-19, but a literal car accident or gun shot wound or any unrelated cause of death would affect those 5/10 year survival rates.
jamin wrote:
seattle prattle wrote:
And let me emphesize, the 82 were deaths IN ONE DAY.
Total death toll is already 433.
82 / day means a less than 4% increase in average deaths per day, a very minor bump that is expected during a season when a disease is spreading around.
The real National Emergency is a couple miles from us, on Sand Point Way, children dying of an uncurable disease that over 50% of us will get sometime in our lives, a 70% mortality rate over 5 years and 52% percent mortality rate over 10 years.
Gee, that makes me feel a lot better! (Hint: sarcasm intended).
The point is this - the daily death rate in Germany is already well past what he implies it would be. 82 deaths in a single day compared to his 30 averaged over a 3+ month timespan,.
Let me make it simple: people need to take this killer virus seriously, and they need to do it to keep themselves safe, their families safe, and health care workers who will be encharged to saving their foolish selves. Perpetuating false or misleading narratives is not what we need.
That is what you are doing, and if we need to error, we should error on the side of safety.
Jamin, i would have thought you were better than this.
Are you? Can you admit you were wrong?
jesseriley wrote:
Don’t worry, Germany is working on cancer, too.
To be honest, I’m way more worried about the zombies in the Seattle area. Be careful out there folks.
he is wrong though wrote:
Also, if my two mins trying to really understand the mindset of ‘Jamin’ was successful, those numbers are 5 and 10 year ‘survival’ rates. That’s the general opposite of ‘mortality.’
Yep, thanks for correcting my gaffe
seattle prattle wrote:
jamin wrote:
82 / day means a less than 4% increase in average deaths per day, a very minor bump that is expected during a season when a disease is spreading around.
The real National Emergency is a couple miles from us, on Sand Point Way, children dying of an uncurable disease that over 50% of us will get sometime in our lives, a 70% mortality rate over 5 years and 52% percent mortality rate over 10 years.
Gee, that makes me feel a lot better! (Hint: sarcasm intended).
The point is this - the daily death rate in Germany is already well past what he implies it would be. 82 deaths in a single day compared to his 30 averaged over a 3+ month timespan,.
Let me make it simple: people need to take this killer virus seriously, and they need to do it to keep themselves safe, their families safe, and health care workers who will be encharged to saving their foolish selves. Perpetuating false or misleading narratives is not what we need.
That is what you are doing, and if we need to error, we should error on the side of safety.
Jamin, i would have thought you were better than this.
Are you? Can you admit you were wrong?
We're gonna be fine, my 98115 brother. We live in the most underrated neighborhood of Seattle.
jesseriley wrote:
He means No, can’t admit he’s wrong.
LOL.
I really like Inslee imploring citizens to find a photo of a nurse and tape it inside the window of your car. From the Seattle Times:
"“I want to ask Washingtonians to do something, which is to take a little picture out of the newspaper of a nurse,” the governor added. “Tape it on your dashboard and before you start your car look at that nurse and say, ‘Do I really want to put this person at risk?'” by leaving home."
I take the same advice and look at each post being posted on messageboards like this and ask myself the same question.
And btw, one of our "neighbors" has passed due to the Covid-19, on March 9th. So, no, not all of us "will be fine", apparently.
Thx.
jesseriley wrote:
No you’d have to be a real man for it to he an ad hominem attack lol. As I said, look to the example of Germany.
Each of your posts confirms my original point that you're both angry and unwell. Bad Mojo has a way of catching with people and you're no exception.
You also need to learn what ad hominem means as your words embody it.
moran112312 wrote:
Too long. .
One word summary: keep calm and carry on.
Dumb. Keep clam. Stay at home.
1 hr interview with "quack" Dr John Ioannidis of Stanford University
jamin wrote:
1 hr interview with "quack" Dr John Ioannidis of Stanford University
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6MZy-2fcBw
Not. Wasting. My. Time.
What's the point?
I watched part of it... he drones on about there not being enough data to make claims about Covid-19 death rate being higher than the flu and then cherry picks a couple small sets of data to claim it’s actually probably lower. It’s possible he was using hyperbole to try to make a valid point and the video was just edited to make him seem like he was just making everything up.
TLDR he said not enough data to establish death rate yet (valid), then cherry picked small samples with faulty assumptions to try to say death rate was actually super low (crackpot).
Germany had only 57 new cases today. Their number of new cases has gone down 4 days in a row.
jamin wrote:
Germany had only 57 new cases today. Their number of new cases has gone down 4 days in a row.
Where are you seeing these numbers? I see 104 deaths and like 4400 new cases. Their numbers of new cases have gone down for a few days so let’s all hope it does stay below 3k... but I still doubt it.
he is wrong though wrote:
jamin wrote:
Germany had only 57 new cases today. Their number of new cases has gone down 4 days in a row.
Where are you seeing these numbers? I see 104 deaths and like 4400 new cases. Their numbers of new cases have gone down for a few days so let’s all hope it does stay below 3k... but I still doubt it.
I see the same.: 104 deaths and like 4400 new cases.
Gee, for a self-proclaimed "Numbers guy" he sure is slipping.
But more importantly, if reality is showing us day after day with numbers like 104 deaths, wouldn't you feel just a little bit, i don't know, let's just say 'WRONG' about your statement that we would see 30 deaths per day worst case scenario over an extended period?
And if you didn't, wouldn't you feel that in this country, with one state (New York) alone reporting 237 deaths yesterday, that you would be wary of minimizing the severity of this pandemic? Or maybe, just maybe, the fact that one state alone (New York) today surpassed the unfortunate milestone of over 1,000 deaths to date due to that pandemic, give you pause?
Not our boy, Jamin. No sir.
Tell me again how it's going to be okay in our neighborhood....
Go to
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/germany/
Go to "Active Cases"
March 29th: 52,683
March 30th: 52,740
52,740 - 52,683 = 57
This guy doesn't look like he meets the HRH/Coevett requirements to be considered German.
You are misinterpreting the data.
Look at the graph that reads "Daily New Cases in Germany" and that shows the 4400 new cases for March 30th. You are looking at the active cases, and you have to understand that active cases also includes those that recovered. So even though there were a lot of new cases (4400), a sufficient number recovered to make the overall cases only 57.
Point being, there are a lot of new cases still, and that did not drop for 4 days as you claim, only 3.
Hang in there, buddy.
