Camp Hill was named in a lot of IP addresses early in the original thread, too.
Camp Hill is a suburb of Harrisburg, PA (and not Philly).
Camp Hill was named in a lot of IP addresses early in the original thread, too.
Camp Hill is a suburb of Harrisburg, PA (and not Philly).
Nigel Tufnel wrote:
You were doing fine until the last paragraph.
I didn't know that I was being graded. Well, if you are melting, then you too are free not to read anything Rossi related.
And also not where I live/am posting from. But the irony isn't lost on me that in a thread about a cheat someone felt the need to lie about looking up my IP address and making up a location.
a lot more out there wrote:
And also not where I live/am posting from. But the irony isn't lost on me that in a thread about a cheat someone felt the need to lie about looking up my IP address and making up a location.
Yeah, we know, you are in/from Rydal....LL
a lot more out there wrote:
And also not where I live/am posting from. But the irony isn't lost on me that in a thread about a cheat someone felt the need to lie about looking up my IP address and making up a location.
Gotta asked, a lot more what is out there? Getting your assed kicked?
I agree, there is a lot of hate directed toward Rossi. However, from my somewhat sporadic reading of Rossi threads, it seems like that is mostly coming from people who actually know him, live in his area, etc. and it seems like Rossi put in a lot of effort to generate that hate. The guy seems like a crazy vindictive azzhole who went after people. But, outside of those who actually been the direct beneficiary of Rossi's shittiness, it's just been a long crazy story. YOu can't make this stuff up.
If the story was about someone else people may have some sympathy, but he really is a very nasty person (the kind of guy who mocks disabled people and children), it's pretty much impossible to feel sorry for him. Rossi's troubles are 100% down to Rossi and if you look back through the threads, quite a few people over the years have offered him really good advice on how to avoid the place he now finds himself in. At 50 however, I think his personality is set in stone and this won't be the last time he gets arrested for being Mike Rossi.
Lindsay Lane wrote:
a lot more out there wrote:And also not where I live/am posting from. But the irony isn't lost on me that in a thread about a cheat someone felt the need to lie about looking up my IP address and making up a location.
Yeah, we know, you are in/from Rydal....LL
Kansas City. Close, though.
a lot more out there wrote:
Lindsay Lane wrote:Yeah, we know, you are in/from Rydal....LL
Kansas City. Close, though.
Which one?
The scare quotes in the subject line -- "rock bottom" -- "become a better person" - "simple assault" -- should be read by the late great Bennett Brauer, master of air quotes:
an "anonymous poster" wrote:
The scare quotes in the subject line -- "rock bottom" -- "become a better person" - "simple assault" -- should be read by the late great Bennett Brauer, master of air quotes:
http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/weekend-update-segment-chris-farley-as-bennett-brauer/3505988?snl=1
We would have to check with the moral authority of the thread. A lot more out there does this pass approval?
If I have cheated in a race, draw attention to myself in a narcissistic way and wind up the subject of a thread here, is it fair enough with posters here that I get the thread closed down by anonymously posting death threats against myself from a random WiFi hotspot?
From reading many of the posts I would conclude that this is a foolproof way to silence criticism.
ExpertKipWatcher wrote:
If I have cheated in a race, draw attention to myself in a narcissistic way and wind up the subject of a thread here, is it fair enough with posters here that I get the thread closed down by anonymously posting death threats against myself from a random WiFi hotspot?
From reading many of the posts I would conclude that this is a foolproof way to silence criticism.
And the people defending Rossi haven't yet commented on Mike's abuse of a 47 year old woman.
I forgot one thing, if I regularly post defensive stuff referring to myself in the third person, nobody would ever suspect it is me because after all the internet is full of people waiting for a chance to defend the reputation of cheats they have never met but curiously seem to know an awful lot of detailed information about.
Where is the evidence that he assaulted his wife? Not heresay, but an actual link.
Slow down pardners wrote:
Where is the evidence that he assaulted his wife? Not heresay, but an actual link.
You are correct, the only information is from the Philadelphia Magazine which only says
"According to the Philadelphia Police Department, there was a “domestic incident†in which Rossi allegedly punched a 47-year-old woman during an argument."
It is a reasonable inference as to who this is from the word "domestic" but as you point out, this could be an entirely different domestic arrangement.
http://www.phillymag.com/news/2017/08/21/mike-rossi-arrested-punching-woman/How would you know how old his wife is? Stalk much? Jeez.
A "domestic" incident suggests it happened in the home. This occurred at a concert. Want to try again?
Starting to sound like " you can't prove I didn't run because you have no proof!"
#1 most popular article on phillymag.com (for whatever that is worth..probably not much...lol)
Maybe we should also start calling him "Iron" Mike after his latest arrest for apparently punching a woman.
Slow down pardners wrote:
A "domestic" incident suggests it happened in the home. This occurred at a concert. Want to try again?
domestic
dəˈmɛstɪk/Submit
adjective
1.
relating to the running of a home or to family relations.
"domestic chores"
synonyms: family, home, private; More
2.
existing or occurring inside a particular country; not foreign or international.
"Egypt's domestic affairs"
synonyms: national, state, home, local, internal, interior, not foreign, not international
"the domestic car manufacturing industry"
Lyin King wrote:
Starting to sound like " you can't prove I didn't run because you have no proof!"
Not quite there Mike. I am sure you didn't take logic in Temple but what you are doing is an argument from ignorance, or argumentum ad ignorantiam, in other words a negative proof, which is a logical fallacy.