Looks like Des posted a follow-up.
Looks like Des posted a follow-up.
Bobby1 wrote:
Two years is a long time, if there was something to find it would have been found.
So there's a two year limit? Looks like OJ is innocent then.
This could be correct wrote:
I don't see how people make this distinction. I read this as implying that Hasay is a cheat. I don't share the opinion but I am not a pro runner.
That's exactly what she suggested.
Linden is a Jerk.
Stoppit Smith wrote:
Not because I think Salazar is clean, but that it casts indirect aspersions against anyone trained by salazar.
Well yes. If - like USADA claims - Salazar used prohibited methods, and experimented with testo, and sends drugs in hollowed books across borders, etc., then yes, his whole group is suspect.
When she suffers a tragedy.
casual obsever wrote:
Stoppit Smith wrote:Not because I think Salazar is clean, but that it casts indirect aspersions against anyone trained by salazar.
Well yes. If - like USADA claims - Salazar used prohibited methods, and experimented with testo, and sends drugs in hollowed books across borders, etc., then yes, his whole group is suspect.
I see it differently. I respect both Kara and Ritz as they both made a decision to leave Alberto. I can see how someone can make a mistake. I don't understand how they do it over and over again.
DLFC wrote:
Looks like Des posted a follow-up.
https://twitter.com/des_linden/status/873891134317133824
Just read the replies to her original tweet. Most of her followers liked the tweet but a couple got offended and she replied to them.
Typical Hanson Crap wrote:
She is like the Hanson bros., sits back and snipes with no proof. Then backtracks and acts like it was all in innocence. Desi has been exposed for what she is. A whiny little bitch that just isn't good enough.
Sounds like someone got their Nikes all knotted up.
Desi doesn't need proof. WADA is taking care of that.
Then why backtrack? Why act like it was just a joke? Because she is smart enough to know that her image took a big hit.
Why doesn't she double down and continue to attack? Because it is easier to snipe and then back off. She is a coward.
Typical Hanson Crap wrote:
She is like the Hanson bros., sits back and snipes with no proof. Then backtracks and acts like it was all in innocence. Desi has been exposed for what she is. A whiny little bitch that just isn't good enough.
I think you are talking about yourself. Desi has had a fine career and props to her for not wanting cheats in the sport.
Typical Hanson Crap wrote:
Then why backtrack? Why act like it was just a joke? Because she is smart enough to know that her image took a big hit.
Why doesn't she double down and continue to attack? Because it is easier to snipe and then back off. She is a coward.
BS. Read the replies to her original tweet. Overwhelmingly positive responses. Only a few Nike cucks got their little feelings hurt.
Desi is a bit reserved in person. She's obviously not going to be setting pr's in the near future, but as someone posted back a ways, she's trying to be relevant & is pulling a Goucher stunt---keep your name out there and get noticed. Saying controversial things does what was intended, it got to this site. Piling on when it's been going on for so long does what? She's not changing the outcome 1% and neither is Goucher.Contrary to what many of you believe, Alberto is no dummy and will surely prove that what any athlete was given would have been a legal amount...wait for it.
the camel wrote:
Typical Hanson Crap wrote:She is like the Hanson bros., sits back and snipes with no proof. Then backtracks and acts like it was all in innocence. Desi has been exposed for what she is. A whiny little bitch that just isn't good enough.
I think you are talking about yourself. Desi has had a fine career and props to her for not wanting cheats in the sport.
deep thoughts w/ Jack H. wrote:
Desi is a bit reserved in person. She's obviously not going to be setting pr's in the near future, but as someone posted back a ways, she's trying to be relevant & is pulling a Goucher stunt---keep your name out there and get noticed. Saying controversial things does what was intended, it got to this site.
Piling on when it's been going on for so long does what? She's not changing the outcome 1% and neither is Goucher.
Contrary to what many of you believe, Alberto is no dummy and will surely prove that what any athlete was given would have been a legal amount...wait for it.
the camel wrote:I think you are talking about yourself. Desi has had a fine career and props to her for not wanting cheats in the sport.
Yeah, I'm sure Goucher sworn testimony is having no impact on the investigation. SMDH
deep thoughts w/ Jack H. wrote:
Desi is a bit reserved in person. She's obviously not going to be setting pr's in the near future, but as someone posted back a ways, she's trying to be relevant & is pulling a Goucher stunt---keep your name out there and get noticed. Saying controversial things does what was intended, it got to this site.
Piling on when it's been going on for so long does what? She's not changing the outcome 1% and neither is Goucher.
Contrary to what many of you believe, Alberto is no dummy and will surely prove that what any athlete was given would have been a legal amount...wait for it.
the camel wrote:I think you are talking about yourself. Desi has had a fine career and props to her for not wanting cheats in the sport.
She's made comments about wanting a clean sport, in person, before.
She was just 7th in the Olympics and 4th at Boston, so she is still relevant, despite you haters wanting to claim otherwise.
"Piling on"? She is making a joke at the expense of someone she believes not to be following the rules. The tweet is expressing her opinion not intended to change any outcomes.
I don't doubt that Salazar will weasel his way out of any penalties - he's done it his whole career.
I'm sure that you are dumb enough to realize that her "sworn testimony" is no more important than Salazar's, right? Oh you didn't realize that. Learn the law dummy, people swear to things all the time, so what! SMDH
in the no wrote:
deep thoughts w/ Jack H. wrote:Desi is a bit reserved in person. She's obviously not going to be setting pr's in the near future, but as someone posted back a ways, she's trying to be relevant & is pulling a Goucher stunt---keep your name out there and get noticed. Saying controversial things does what was intended, it got to this site.
Piling on when it's been going on for so long does what? She's not changing the outcome 1% and neither is Goucher.
Contrary to what many of you believe, Alberto is no dummy and will surely prove that what any athlete was given would have been a legal amount...wait for it.
Yeah, I'm sure Goucher sworn testimony is having no impact on the investigation. SMDH
Ha! You know nothing about the law, stay on the sidelines. Goucher can say what she wants, but she's safe as long as what she said "can't be proven false". Aka, it's her word and what she saw. Again, stay on the sidelines if you don't understand how things work, which you don't.
[quote]Typical Hanson Crap wrote:
I'm sure that you are dumb enough to realize that her "sworn testimony" is no more important than Salazar's, right? Oh you didn't realize that. Learn the law dummy, people swear to things all the time, so what! SMDH[quote]
And his sworn testimony will have impact on the investigation also dvmbass. That is why they have testimonies, to get facts, or lies in Salazar's case, about the investigation and move forward.
NOP is going down. Jump ship now and or go down with the drowning rats.
Her sworn testimony WON'T have an impact on the investigation dumba$$. His will as he's the one being accused. Read a book and learn something dumba$$.
in the no wrote:
[quote]Typical Hanson Crap wrote:
I'm sure that you are dumb enough to realize that her "sworn testimony" is no more important than Salazar's, right? Oh you didn't realize that. Learn the law dummy, people swear to things all the time, so what! SMDH[quote]
And his sworn testimony will have impact on the investigation also dvmbass. That is why they have testimonies, to get facts, or lies in Salazar's case, about the investigation and move forward.
NOP is going down. Jump ship now and or go down with the drowning rats.
And NO, the NOP is not going down. You really don't have a clue how things work, do ya dumba$$?????
Typical Hanson Crap wrote:
Her sworn testimony WON'T have an impact on the investigation dumba$$. His will as he's the one being accused. Read a book and learn something dumba$$.
in the no wrote:[quote]Typical Hanson Crap wrote:
I'm sure that you are dumb enough to realize that her "sworn testimony" is no more important than Salazar's, right? Oh you didn't realize that. Learn the law dummy, people swear to things all the time, so what! SMDH[quote]
And his sworn testimony will have impact on the investigation also dvmbass. That is why they have testimonies, to get facts, or lies in Salazar's case, about the investigation and move forward.
NOP is going down. Jump ship now and or go down with the drowning rats.
Dingler wrote:
Everyone knows Salazar doesn't really transport drugs in his backpack.
He uses hollowed out books for that.
Desi's joke is that Saladbar always has a backpack with him. Hence the reference.