Ghost of Igloi wrote:
More reading for Ms. CFA:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/better-performance-isnt-tempting-investors-into-active-management-2017-04-10
Good stuff! I've culled a few gems from your article for those who don't have the time to read it.
"According to S&P Dow Jones Indices, the number of active funds that consistently outperform their benchmarks over the long term is essentially zero."
"Passive investing, a winner in 2016, shows no sign of stopping."
"In the first quarter, 52% of active equity managers outperformed their benchmarks, according to Morgan Stanley. To compare, roughly a third of equity managers had outperformed over the previous two years." -- (Translation: when active is at its best, it's no better than a crap shoot. Usually it's much worse.)
"...better results were due more to the current market cycle rather than the abilities of the managers."
"According to Morningstar, only 20.3% of large-cap value managers outperformed over last year. For the small-cap and midcap categories, the results were even worse."