wineturtle wrote:
First it's been a good number of years since I studied the rules and I'm unclear on some things.
What rule allowed them to call the list official before the protest periods had expired or while a protest was being reviewed ?
Can you declare something final when it can still be ammended? IMO it doesn't matter if the door swings open for entry or exit something is not final,until the door is no longer allowed to swing.
The idea that an unintended consequences of Mortimer asking for a ruling on Anderson's pushing her resulted in an unaffected runner (Schmidt) advancing to the final field even though the ruling for a DQ ,the reason she was advanced, no longer is valid seems more than a bit odd.
Either I need a better brain USAT&F needs better rules or both--I vote both!
Apparently it was Mortimer who filed the protest and the rules do mention that the affected runner(s) should be advanced. Assuming that is true then I'm not clear what happened here.
There is no reference to "finalizing" a field after prelims nor is there any reference to this type of situation in the past.
Based on my memory, and the example of the 1996 1500m, it seems USATF as always error'd on the side of more in the final than kicking guys out...at least in the non laned events. I definitely don't recall a runner who appeared to advance because of a DQ was then removed from the next round.