If he doesn't have a pair or better on the flop then I'm beating him on the flop regardless of his holdings, and I'm beating him by 60%+.
Thanks for the advice, but this situation was extremely different than a regular tournament situation.
Whether I'm in the money or not has no bearing at all on how aggressive I am. The table dynamics are what affect that. I do not play to reduce variance, I play to increase winrate, which is part of the reason why I did not want to play in the wsop ME. If I make the money only 1/10 times being very aggressive but I win the tournament 1/100 times doing that I will make far more money on average than if I play more conservatively and money 1/5 times but only win 1/200 times.
I push every small edge I find unless it is deep into the money and I have an extremely large stack (and am playing another XL stack). I will toss 55/45 coins all day unless I have an extremely large stack that is threatened by another XL stack. If you pass on these types of situations constantly then you will be bullied for your chips AND your winrate will drop. But that doesn't matter because I had an 84% equity in the pot. I was not exactly flipping coins.
Money is the bottom line here, and so far my style has served me quite well. It is not perfect and I strive to improve it, but in this situation I made the right move. Against 99.9% of players not only do I raise less than 10k (the blinds were about 1k-2k i recall) but I don't lead out on the very dangerous flop and I fold to any decent bets on the flop. But this situation was totally different. I knew he would call my bet with anything preflop, so I put him on complete trash (I was wrong here, but he was capable of calling this bet with 73o). The flop came jq2 and I bet to see if he had a pair, he didn't push so I didn't think he could beat a pair (which meant my AK was beating him) so I moved all in. I was right in doing this, especially since I based it off earlier behavior, and I refuse to consider it a bad play.