The Chicago Way wrote:
You also might hear (if the professor is not a left wing Obama cultist) that Obama was a political hire, and did not have the requisite background to be offered a full professorship (although the school would happily have kept him as a lecturer.)
That is absolutely false. First, as another pointed out, Obama repeatedly turned down Chicago's offers of a tenure-track professorship. Second, Obama was not a political hire. Obama was recommended for the Chicago faculty by Michael McConnell, a professor at Chicago who had been very impressed by Obama's editing of McConnell's article in the Harvard Law Review. McConnell is a well-known conservative Republican who was eventually appointed by George W. Bush to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. I know McConnell fairly well, having edited one of his articles myself when I was in law school many years ago, and having argued appellate cases in front of him in recent years. McConnell would have never recommended Obama as some sort of "political hire" for Chicago; McConnell simply respected Obama's scholarship and intellect.
I understand that one or more conservatives on the Chicago faculty were not enamoured of Obama and his rock-star presence on the faculty. In particular, Richard Epstein (another conservative Chicago professor whose work I edited in law school) never saw eye-to-eye with Obama on constitutional law, and has spoken publicly about his impressions of Obama when he was a lecturer at Chicago. I doubt that Epstein did or would have voted in favor of Obama as a tenure-track faculty member, but Epstein's views would not have been reflective of the faculty as a whole. Indeed, Epstein's political and jurisprudential views place him in a rather marginalized position among constitutional scholars, probably even at a place like the Universtiy of Chicago Law School.