There is this thing called the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered Model (SIR), which can be expressed as a system of partial differential equations, or carried out in discrete form. This can be parameterized using the reproduction number of a virus, and also the infectious period. Both of these inputs affect the rate of spread, and they are not independent variables. i.e., if we shorten an infectious period for a given virus, we will decrease the reproduction number. So, for instance, if you are infectious for 5 days instead of 10, you will infect less people, on average.
The whole point of a vaccine is to give your immune system practice in fighting off a virus. Kind of like a running workout. A virus can still invade your body, but it will be better prepared to fight it off, which means you will be less likely to die, and your infectious period will be shorter. This is not rocket science, and it is a known fact.
The whole point with COVID was to slow it down so we did not have 200 million infections in a short time period, because the reproduction number was high. There is a big difference between 2.9 (COVID) and 1.5 (common flu). SIR forecasts can be done on a simple spreadsheet. Measles has a reproduction number of 15! If a virus is unleashed on us with that high of a reproduction number, surely the hospital system would see massive failures.
There is this thing called the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered Model (SIR), which can be expressed as a system of partial differential equations, or carried out in discrete form. This can be parameterized using the reproduction number of a virus, and also the infectious period. Both of these inputs affect the rate of spread, and they are not independent variables. i.e., if we shorten an infectious period for a given virus, we will decrease the reproduction number. So, for instance, if you are infectious for 5 days instead of 10, you will infect less people, on average.
The whole point of a vaccine is to give your immune system practice in fighting off a virus. Kind of like a running workout. A virus can still invade your body, but it will be better prepared to fight it off, which means you will be less likely to die, and your infectious period will be shorter. This is not rocket science, and it is a known fact.
The whole point with COVID was to slow it down so we did not have 200 million infections in a short time period, because the reproduction number was high. There is a big difference between 2.9 (COVID) and 1.5 (common flu). SIR forecasts can be done on a simple spreadsheet. Measles has a reproduction number of 15! If a virus is unleashed on us with that high of a reproduction number, surely the hospital system would see massive failures.
That's all folks.
The jab is not a vaccine. There is zero evidence it slowed transmission. Zero evidence it lessened symptoms. These claims were made when it became clear that the claim it stopped tranmission was 100% false. In fact, anecdotal evidence is that those taking the jab got Covid a lot more than those who did not,
The whole point of a vaccine is to give your immune system practice in fighting off a virus. Kind of like a running workout. A virus can still invade your body, but it will be better prepared to fight it off, which means you will be less likely to die, and your infectious period will be shorter. This is not rocket science, and it is a known fact.
April 2020: Covid-19 Infection fatality rate 0.8%
December 2020: Covid-19 Infection fatality rate 0.3%
Why would I take an injection of an experimental chemical and biological formulation when the lethality of the virus had already declined significantly by the time the "vaccines" were rolled out to the public ?
IFRs according to the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University.
There is this thing called the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered Model (SIR), which can be expressed as a system of partial differential equations, or carried out in discrete form. This can be parameterized using the reproduction number of a virus, and also the infectious period. Both of these inputs affect the rate of spread, and they are not independent variables. i.e., if we shorten an infectious period for a given virus, we will decrease the reproduction number. So, for instance, if you are infectious for 5 days instead of 10, you will infect less people, on average.
The whole point of a vaccine is to give your immune system practice in fighting off a virus. Kind of like a running workout. A virus can still invade your body, but it will be better prepared to fight it off, which means you will be less likely to die, and your infectious period will be shorter. This is not rocket science, and it is a known fact.
The whole point with COVID was to slow it down so we did not have 200 million infections in a short time period, because the reproduction number was high. There is a big difference between 2.9 (COVID) and 1.5 (common flu). SIR forecasts can be done on a simple spreadsheet. Measles has a reproduction number of 15! If a virus is unleashed on us with that high of a reproduction number, surely the hospital system would see massive failures.
That's all folks.
The jab is not a vaccine. There is zero evidence it slowed transmission. Zero evidence it lessened symptoms. These claims were made when it became clear that the claim it stopped tranmission was 100% false. In fact, anecdotal evidence is that those taking the jab got Covid a lot more than those who did not,
The mRNAs vaccines reduce the chance of infection, chance of hospitalization, chance of death, total viral load and duration of symptoms (the latter two which both influence chance of transmission).
You can lie all you want but there are 4 years of data saying you are wrong.
The whole point of a vaccine is to give your immune system practice in fighting off a virus. Kind of like a running workout. A virus can still invade your body, but it will be better prepared to fight it off, which means you will be less likely to die, and your infectious period will be shorter. This is not rocket science, and it is a known fact.
April 2020: Covid-19 Infection fatality rate 0.8%
December 2020: Covid-19 Infection fatality rate 0.3%
Why would I take an injection of an experimental chemical and biological formulation when the lethality of the virus had already declined significantly by the time the "vaccines" were rolled out to the public ?
IFRs according to the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University.
THIS is practical science.
You can either ask the 1M+ dead Americans,
Or realize that death is not the only risk. Severe illness, hospitalization, missed days of work school, etc. are all bad and can be avoided with the vaccine!
It's great that most of DanMs and Newnames anti-vaxx talking points are from ~1-2 years ago when they were certain the vaccines would prove
1) ineffective over time
2) dangerous with terrible long-term consequences
Now that the vaccines are still potent and durable, which boosters conferring additional benefit and none of the vaccine injury/death claims even amounted to more the 1/10,000,000th that of the virus --- they are just whining like children
There is no conclusive evidence of a lab leak vs zoonotic origin.
And there never will be because it was intentionally released there.
What is very interesting is why the U.S. Army hired the Wuhan lab to send them bat Covid samples. The Fort Detrick installation was the center for bioweapons development for decades. When that works was "stopped" the site rebranded itself as center for bioweapons defense development. Really?
Ahh i see. You’re a true nutter who believes grand conspiracies with no evidence.
Lab leak, plausible.
But you think Fauci paradropped into Wuhan with a vial.
The whole point of a vaccine is to give your immune system practice in fighting off a virus. Kind of like a running workout. A virus can still invade your body, but it will be better prepared to fight it off, which means you will be less likely to die, and your infectious period will be shorter. This is not rocket science, and it is a known fact.
April 2020: Covid-19 Infection fatality rate 0.8%
December 2020: Covid-19 Infection fatality rate 0.3%
Why would I take an injection of an experimental chemical and biological formulation when the lethality of the virus had already declined significantly by the time the "vaccines" were rolled out to the public ?
IFRs according to the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University.
There is this thing called the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered Model (SIR), which can be expressed as a system of partial differential equations, or carried out in discrete form. This can be parameterized using the reproduction number of a virus, and also the infectious period. Both of these inputs affect the rate of spread, and they are not independent variables. i.e., if we shorten an infectious period for a given virus, we will decrease the reproduction number. So, for instance, if you are infectious for 5 days instead of 10, you will infect less people, on average.
The whole point of a vaccine is to give your immune system practice in fighting off a virus. Kind of like a running workout. A virus can still invade your body, but it will be better prepared to fight it off, which means you will be less likely to die, and your infectious period will be shorter. This is not rocket science, and it is a known fact.
The whole point with COVID was to slow it down so we did not have 200 million infections in a short time period, because the reproduction number was high. There is a big difference between 2.9 (COVID) and 1.5 (common flu). SIR forecasts can be done on a simple spreadsheet. Measles has a reproduction number of 15! If a virus is unleashed on us with that high of a reproduction number, surely the hospital system would see massive failures.
That's all folks.
Thanks for posting this. I had to look it up and found several scholarly articles in the SIR model.
SIR is accepted science, right? As you yourself wrote: This is not rocket science, and it is a known fact.
So, given that, this is a known fact, you would agree that Fauci, Walensky, other health experts, and Biden who told us that the vaccine would prevent infection and transmission back in 2021 were lying to us, right?
They were hijacking the actual science and lying to us. As you yourself wrote: This is not rocket science, and it is a known fact.
There is this thing called the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered Model (SIR), which can be expressed as a system of partial differential equations, or carried out in discrete form. This can be parameterized using the reproduction number of a virus, and also the infectious period. Both of these inputs affect the rate of spread, and they are not independent variables. i.e., if we shorten an infectious period for a given virus, we will decrease the reproduction number. So, for instance, if you are infectious for 5 days instead of 10, you will infect less people, on average.
The whole point of a vaccine is to give your immune system practice in fighting off a virus. Kind of like a running workout. A virus can still invade your body, but it will be better prepared to fight it off, which means you will be less likely to die, and your infectious period will be shorter. This is not rocket science, and it is a known fact.
The whole point with COVID was to slow it down so we did not have 200 million infections in a short time period, because the reproduction number was high. There is a big difference between 2.9 (COVID) and 1.5 (common flu). SIR forecasts can be done on a simple spreadsheet. Measles has a reproduction number of 15! If a virus is unleashed on us with that high of a reproduction number, surely the hospital system would see massive failures.
That's all folks.
Thanks for posting this. I had to look it up and found several scholarly articles in the SIR model.
SIR is accepted science, right? As you yourself wrote: This is not rocket science, and it is a known fact.
So, given that, this is a known fact, you would agree that Fauci, Walensky, other health experts, and Biden who told us that the vaccine would prevent infection and transmission back in 2021 were lying to us, right?
They were hijacking the actual science and lying to us. As you yourself wrote: This is not rocket science, and it is a known fact.
The vaccine did prevent transmission quite well in 2021. Strain mutation changed that
Thanks for posting this. I had to look it up and found several scholarly articles in the SIR model.
SIR is accepted science, right? As you yourself wrote: This is not rocket science, and it is a known fact.
So, given that, this is a known fact, you would agree that Fauci, Walensky, other health experts, and Biden who told us that the vaccine would prevent infection and transmission back in 2021 were lying to us, right?
They were hijacking the actual science and lying to us. As you yourself wrote: This is not rocket science, and it is a known fact.
The vaccine did prevent transmission quite well in 2021. Strain mutation changed that
The original clinical trials showed >95% protection vs infection
December 2020: Covid-19 Infection fatality rate 0.3%
Why would I take an injection of an experimental chemical and biological formulation when the lethality of the virus had already declined significantly by the time the "vaccines" were rolled out to the public ?
IFRs according to the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University.
THIS is practical science.
You can either ask the 1M+ dead Americans,
Or realize that death is not the only risk. Severe illness, hospitalization, missed days of work school, etc. are all bad and can be avoided with the vaccine!
Unvaxxed me: Age 64, 27:11 5K at the Turkey Trot last week.
But this being LetsRun, most people here think that performance indicates I am at death's door.
Or realize that death is not the only risk. Severe illness, hospitalization, missed days of work school, etc. are all bad and can be avoided with the vaccine!
Unvaxxed me: Age 64, 27:11 5K at the Turkey Trot last week.
But this being LetsRun, most people here think that performance indicates I am at death's door.
No - that's pretty good! Doesn't really play into the vaccine discussion though
There is this thing called the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered Model (SIR), which can be expressed as a system of partial differential equations, or carried out in discrete form. This can be parameterized using the reproduction number of a virus, and also the infectious period. Both of these inputs affect the rate of spread, and they are not independent variables. i.e., if we shorten an infectious period for a given virus, we will decrease the reproduction number. So, for instance, if you are infectious for 5 days instead of 10, you will infect less people, on average.
The whole point of a vaccine is to give your immune system practice in fighting off a virus. Kind of like a running workout. A virus can still invade your body, but it will be better prepared to fight it off, which means you will be less likely to die, and your infectious period will be shorter. This is not rocket science, and it is a known fact.
The whole point with COVID was to slow it down so we did not have 200 million infections in a short time period, because the reproduction number was high. There is a big difference between 2.9 (COVID) and 1.5 (common flu). SIR forecasts can be done on a simple spreadsheet. Measles has a reproduction number of 15! If a virus is unleashed on us with that high of a reproduction number, surely the hospital system would see massive failures.
That's all folks.
The jab is not a vaccine. There is zero evidence it slowed transmission. Zero evidence it lessened symptoms. These claims were made when it became clear that the claim it stopped tranmission was 100% false. In fact, anecdotal evidence is that those taking the jab got Covid a lot more than those who did not,
You asked for evidence, got a clear science and math explanation, then countered with "anecdotal evidence".