A while back Tim hutchings wrote in a piece in Athletics weekly that pretty much any elite Moroccan distance performance could be assumed to be drug boosted. AW doesn't court controversy so I guess they thought it fair comment.
I don't want to sound like a serrano fanboy but he's always been vociferously anti doping as have several of his big hitters ( at euro level, please no smartarse stuff that anything lower than global 3rd is just hobbyjogger) such as Higuero, Guerra and chema Martinez. Notable that just as Oumaiz seems to have found his gear in Ifrane so Bruno the Argentine mentioned above failed his test for EPO in south America although predominantly based in Spain, suggesting that once away from the coach's vicinity.....
The same AW that crowned Cram best athlete of the year in 1985.
Good reading for the articles made at home.
According to IAAF , that was the year he ran 1’42, 2’12, 3’29, 3’46, 4’51. That’s not enough to garner best athlete of the year?
According to IAAF , that was the year he ran 1’42, 2’12, 3’29, 3’46, 4’51. That’s not enough to garner best athlete of the year?
You do realize that the poster to whom you replied is an Aouita sycophant.
AW a British news paper + Cram a British runner = find who is the sycophant
Answer me should be S. Coe the only British runner that run under 1min 42 sec in one century? and for what reason .... let me guess: he is the head of the world athletics and none should talk about that.
Do what you can to make African evils: here is your mission by Coe
Add to that lamers in youtube like this "total running productions" and his stolen material.
You do realize that the poster to whom you replied is an Aouita sycophant.
AW a British news paper + Cram a British runner = find who is the sycophant
Answer me should be S. Coe the only British runner that run under 1min 42 sec in one century? and for what reason .... let me guess: he is the head of the world athletics and none should talk about that.
Do what you can to make African evils: here is your mission by Coe
Add to that lamers in youtube like this "total running productions" and his stolen material.
Going through this thread, I cannot tell if this is a serious poster or someone trolling? If it really is someone that is serious, there are some very significant anger issues here.
AW a British news paper + Cram a British runner = find who is the sycophant
Answer me should be S. Coe the only British runner that run under 1min 42 sec in one century? and for what reason .... let me guess: he is the head of the world athletics and none should talk about that.
Do what you can to make African evils: here is your mission by Coe
Add to that lamers in youtube like this "total running productions" and his stolen material.
Going through this thread, I cannot tell if this is a serious poster or someone trolling? If it really is someone that is serious, there are some very significant anger issues here.
The subject of the thread is "Moroccan are cheater" and I was answering a previews poster that cited a claim from a journalist of AW.
Going through this thread, I cannot tell if this is a serious poster or someone trolling? If it really is someone that is serious, there are some very significant anger issues here.
The subject of the thread is "Moroccan are cheater" and I was answering a previews poster that cited a claim from a journalist of AW.
In your favour, and I think it may be the only thing going for you, is that your English is likely better than the Arabic of others on this thread. Your logic that Coe ran 1.41 800 because 30 years later he headed WA isn't without flaws, if I may.
LOL!!!!! That's precisely what rekrunner would say right???? You and I already knew that LOL!!!!! And that's why it's so easy for both of us to think that he is at least PROBABLY PRO-DOPING!!!!! He is forever trying to weave a subjective way out of the situation for dopers and you cannot do that without at least implicitly DEFENDING them as well!!!!!
LOL!!!!!!!!
Keep reading to see if your prediction pans out. (Hint -- they don't.)
You only prove time and time again that it is easy for you to think things that are plainly wrong. I do not defend the doping of Ouamaiz, and I do not give dopers a free pass, regardless whether their performances are fast, medium, or slow, or DNF or DNS.
Look I don't need to re-explain how objectivity stems from subjective inclinations okay???
And hence don't need to re-explain how you are probably pro-doping at least!!!!