You must be confusing me with someone else. On these threads, I take very special care never to call people with disorders of male sex development men - especially not the the persons with CAIS you continually trot out as though they are some kind of gotchas even though they are not germane to the issues under discussion.
DSD stands for disorders or differences of sex development. I don't care much one way or the other. If people with these DSDs want to say differences of sex development, that's fine with me. Some people with DSDs prefer the term variations of sex development. Others prefer variations of sex characteristics. This is not for me to decide.
I object the use of the term "intersex" because it's imprecise, misleading and stigmatizing in the eyes of most of the general public. And because it's used by gender identity ideologues to prop up fatuous claims such as the ones you make, which include: 1) people with DSDs can't be classed as male or female; 2) "human sex is not binary."
However, I think it would be helpful to all concerned if DSD conditions were spoken of plainly and specifically by sex. So instead of saying that someone like Caster Semenya has a disorder/difference of sex development, let's be honest and say that Semenya has a disorder or difference of male sex development. Similarly, rather than say the fetus I lost to miscarriage midway through pregnancy had a disorder/difference of sex development, let's be precise and say my miscarried offspring had a disorder/difference of female sex development
The bottom line is that individuals with DSDs in the videos you posted all came into being because of egg + sperm the way all the rest of us did, and they all were gestated in the bodies of female human beings who after a relatively long period of time gave birth to them as babies. Should any of the individuals in those videos decide to become parents themselves, they'll find that egg + sperm and gestation inside the body of a female human is the only way to do it.
Though some of the persons with DMSDs in the videos you posted might have their DMSDs due to di novo mutations that occurred after their fathers' perm met their mothers' egg, two-thirds of them will have their DSMDs because of an inherited mutation on the X chromosome they got from their mothers. So whilst these persons might choose to identify with "the box opposite of their karyotype," their own medical histories and the etiology of their DMSDs show that their karyotype matters. If they were XX and SRY gene negative instead of XY and SRY gene positive, they would have the same exact genetic mutations but those mutations would not have resulted in a DSD. Because androgen insensitivity conditions only affect the sex development of males.
I disagree with your claim that "Disorder of Sex Development" is pejorative, because it pathologizes otherwise healthy people, and implies that those people need to be "fixed" by medical professionals.
Lots of people have medical conditions classed as disorders in medical literature and commonly described as disorders in the lay press and in everyday discourse - and they/we don't feel that use of the term disorder to describe these conditions is pejorative, pathologizing or stigmatizing. I personally have at least four conditions routinely described as disorders - three of them genetic in origin. There's no shame in this.
I also find it rich that you'd say I'm the one promoting the idea that people with DSDs need to be fixed by medical professionals. I have consistently argued against unnecessary surgical and hormonal interventions on healthy persons with DSDs. Whereas on a number of threads you have given full-throated support for parents and doctors who decide to do a variety of surgeries - including removal of the gonads aka castration - and experimental hormonal interventions not just on children with various DMSDs, but also on children with gender confusion and distress - all solely so these youngsters' bodies might have an outward appearance somewhat resembling the opposite sex.
We can go round and round on these topics, but the issue remains that you never answer the centrally important questions I ask: How exactly is human sex not binary? What are the names of the additional sexes? How many additional sexes do humans have? What are the names of the additional kinds of gametes that the additional sexes produce? What are the gonads of people outside the customary sex binary called? Where are their gonads located?
If there are additional human sexes, how come no one in fertility medicine, the fertility industry, and fields such as gynecology-obstetrics, urology and andrology seems to have caught on to this yet? How come everyone who has reproduced over the whole course of human history has always done it by egg + sperm?
If there is a third, fourth, fifth, sixth, etc sex in humans, how come the people who get stuck shouldering the entire burden and all the risks of conception, pregnancy, labor, childbirth and maternity are ALWAYS those of us who are members of "the second sex" - aka the female sex?
Do you really mean female human beings like me have ended up doing the lion's share of reproductive labor and taken on all the health risks and crap aspects of pregnancy, labor, childbirth and maternity when none of that was necessary? Wow, we females sure are stupid suckers, huh? Please detail the specifics of exactly how else humans can reproduce so I can start spreading the word to all the women and girls I know. Those who struggle with the very common source of female distress known as tokophobia will be especially relieved and heartened.
If persons with DSDs are living breathing proof that "human sex is not binary" and they can reproduce in other ways outside the binary, how come when Caster Semenya had children, Caster's wife Violet Raseboya was the one who got pregnant, carried the pregnancies and went through labor and gave birth both times? Seems rather unsporting of Caster to leave all the work, pain and health risks to Violet if Caster's DMSD meant the couple could have procreated in another way.