Barracking Your Bama wrote:
Probably coincidental, but noteworthy anyhow.
Lord Coe, on December 20, 2020, promised that being “high profile no longer protects you from the investigative powers of the sport.”
Five days earlier, before any of this was public, Houlihan tested positive.
Once again, likely unrelated, but an interesting coincidence.
BB in the groove.
Did anyone ask him who he thought had been protected or the circumstances of protections ?
Colemen had gone AWOL on the whereabouts violations in October. I think Coe was referencing Colemen and having a clean Olympics. Shelby happened to test positive right before the statement.
Kunte Kinte wrote:
Colemen had gone AWOL on the whereabouts violations in October. I think Coe was referencing Colemen and having a clean Olympics. Shelby happened to test positive right before the statement.
That makes sense.
Another reason there have been irregularities in the pork food supply was the adoption of new rules in spring of 2020 that were passed under the Trump administration in September 2019, called the New Swine Slaughter Inspection System (NSIS). The changes were stark, allowing plants to take over more of the inspection process themselves, speed up the line speed of their operations, and projected to result in the loss of a couple hundred USDA inspectors.
Two USDA inspectors turned whistleblowers talked about what it was like to work in a pork plant, and expressed their deep concerns about the new regulatory scheme in the interview below. Jill Mauer starts it off, saying "Toenails, hair, sexual organs, bladders..." are potentially in your pork. Sexual organs and bladders, by the way, are often quite high in nandrolone.
WADA did not know or care about any of this:
One day wada will have to if they maintain their draconian rules in the face a science.
Some class action of rich sportspeople will sue and sue big.
I have been saying the same about UK food inspection reports
New science ( sorry )