There are many videos showing these laser experiments and proving that water stays flat for long sections, even several miles. How do the round earthward rebut these experiments? I'm sure they also have a good argument against these experiments but haven't read the entire thread.
Well if you did read the thread, or could read in general, you would see the flat earthers being manhandled. LQ is a pretty solid troll, though. But even good trolls are losers.
Where is it then? wrote:
So these people claim to have done the experiments showing there is no curve. Where are these videos? It would be relatively simple to use a laser level and prove this once and for all on a calm ocean or a long Canal.
Several experiments with lasers have been done. Here are a couple:
https://youtu.be/cNEUOnlcIAQhttps://youtu.be/GBhDFO4NMrwKupers wrote:
Well if you did read the thread, or could read in general, you would see the flat earthers being manhandled. LQ is a pretty solid troll, though. But even good trolls are losers.
Wrong ball earth fool. You have not manhandled anybody and you have not proven a globe. Try again.
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance" - Albert Einstein
I'm related to Michael Collins 😉
Kupers wrote:
I'm related to Michael Collins 😉
Why don't you ask Collins why he, Aldrin and Armstrong couldn't quite get their stories straight about seeing or maybe not seeing any stars on the way to and during their little stint on the moon during their press conference in 1969.
You can argue over the intagibles all you want but anyone can see the ground withtheir own eyes and its not curved
Professors of Physics, Geography, Biology, and other disciplines that are based on the global lie are reluctant to lose all credibility they are suffering in the hands of "dumb" and "uneducated" people.
Well, all they have to do is prove their little ball and we'll go away. But unfortunately it's impossible to prove what doesn't exist. Accept the truth before it is too late and seek the truth on your own just as we are doing. The Earth is flat. Deal with it.
I'm sure I just missed it, as it's a long thread, but what is the reasoning behind keeping the "lie" of a round earth? What's the benefit? Who is benefiting?
hmm..... wrote:
I'm sure I just missed it, as it's a long thread, but what is the reasoning behind keeping the "lie" of a round earth? What's the benefit? Who is benefiting?
Poof goes NASA's funding. They control all CGI, artwork, video from the "cosmos". They do everything in their power to perpetuate the myth of a 1000 MPH wobbling, spinning "oblate spheroid" hurdling through outer edge of the Milky Way Galaxy. Btw, don't hold your breath about Elon Musk sending people to the Moon or Richard Branson offering sub-space low orbit pleasure trips for deep pocketed customers- never gonna happen.
As I mentioned before, this argument can be settled fairly quickly. Flip the Hubble telescope 180 degrees and aim it at Australia or New Zealand, or the Southern area of Chile/Argentina. Better yet, why not aim the Hubble directly at the mythical continent of Antarctica? If it shows people, buildings, cars, planes, etc nearly upside down with a live cam recording this without the use of a fisheye/wide angle lens, then the globe believers win. This will never happen because there is no Hubble orbiting the earth.
Shaq has a doctorate from Barry University in Education.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/entertainment/2012/05/shaquille-oneal-earns-doctorate-degree/
Legit question wrote:
Kupers wrote:I'm related to Michael Collins 😉
Why don't you ask Collins why he, Aldrin and Armstrong couldn't quite get their stories straight about seeing or maybe not seeing any stars on the way to and during their little stint on the moon during their press conference in 1969.
For the same reason that I don't ask him about jet fuel burning support beams/pillars of WTC 7. It would be a waste.
Kupers wrote:
Legit question wrote:Why don't you ask Collins why he, Aldrin and Armstrong couldn't quite get their stories straight about seeing or maybe not seeing any stars on the way to and during their little stint on the moon during their press conference in 1969.
For the same reason that I don't ask him about jet fuel burning support beams/pillars of WTC 7. It would be a waste.
He perpetuates the myth and since he's your family you cannot be objective.
Collins on camera, contradicts Armstrong at 34:52 mark
Collins on camera, confronted about faking moon pictures at 35:06 mark
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr6Vcvl0OeU&list=PLKTxk5JVrEs8-PqZRfdvQL4q-TS_xFxGGWhere is it then? wrote:
So these people claim to have done the experiments showing there is no curve. Where are these videos? It would be relatively simple to use a laser level and prove this once and for all on a calm ocean or a long Canal.
It would not because general relativity has proven that light is bent by gravity. If the water stayed at the same level as the laser beam, it would mean the Earth was more massive than previous thought, that's all.
It is also debatable whether a pool of water on a flat surface would itself have a flat surface. There are tides, and winds, and waves, and fluctuations in the gravitational field, and all kinds of things that could make it less than level.
Flat Earthers think it's easy to prove things with science. It's not, it's impossible!
BW
Bad Wigins wrote:
[quote]Where is it then? wrote:
So these people claim to have done the experiments showing there is no curve. Where are these videos? It would be relatively simple to use a laser level and prove this once and for all on a calm ocean or a long Canal.
It would not because general relativity has proven that light is bent by gravity. If the water stayed at the same level as the laser beam, it would mean the Earth was more massive than previous thought, that's all.
It is also debatable whether a pool of water on a flat surface would itself have a flat surface. There are tides, and winds, and waves, and fluctuations in the gravitational field, and all kinds of things that could make it less than level.
Flat Earthers think it's easy to prove things with science. It's not, it's impossible![/quote
BW you are a fool of the highest order. I take no stand on this issue other than to say you are an imbecile.
not so much wrote:
Legit question wrote:The existing laws of density and buoyancy perfectly explained the physics of falling objects long before Isaac Newton bestowed his theory of
“gravity†upon the world. It is a fact that objects placed in denser mediums rise up while objects placed in less dense mediums sink down.
Why do denser objects sink "down" if there is no gravity?
Gravity is a false theory with many inconsistencies of why things fall. Things do not fall because of some magical force but because of density. Your cell phone is denser than the air therefore it falls when you drop it. Everything works because of density.
Why can clouds filled with thousands of gallons of water float if gravity pushes everything toward earth? How can a helium ballon float above a massive ocean sticking to a spinning ball? Density and mass. It’s that simple. You are denser than air so you fall. No magical force needed.
That guy... wrote:
BW
Bad Wigins wrote:[quote]Where is it then? wrote:
So these people claim to have done the experiments showing there is no curve. Where are these videos? It would be relatively simple to use a laser level and prove this once and for all on a calm ocean or a long Canal.
It would not because general relativity has proven that light is bent by gravity. If the water stayed at the same level as the laser beam, it would mean the Earth was more massive than previous thought, that's all.
It is also debatable whether a pool of water on a flat surface would itself have a flat surface. There are tides, and winds, and waves, and fluctuations in the gravitational field, and all kinds of things that could make it less than level.
Flat Earthers think it's easy to prove things with science. It's not, it's impossible![/quote
BW you are a fool of the highest order. I take no stand on this issue other than to say you are an imbecile.
you take no stand on anything, anywhere, all you can do is heckle. If you were competent at it, you'd pick threads where other posters would side with you, not popular ones where off-topic spam is frowned on. Troll to the bitter end, but you are bound to lose as everyone else gets back on topic and turns against you. Nobody cares what you think of me.
You should also learn to check your bbcode before posting.
'Flat Earthers' fall into 3 big categories:
- Online Trolls (this is the biggest group)
- Money Making Scumbags (there is plenty of money to be made from youtube video views by preying on fools)
- Gullible Idiots (the people who just can't help themseves believing in ludicrous conspiracies)
/ end thread
Post #1000
I can't believe this thread is this still alive.