RockyG is either trolling or his brain doesn't work right.
I kinda feel like he's not trolling.
-
54
-
crete wrote:
Yawn^45 wrote:
You conveniently skipped the part of the constitution that’s states powers not granted to the federal government in the document are given to the states.
This means that anyway who isn’t a mouth breather knows my guns cannot be regulated while the ability to kill unborn children in the room is a state level call.Well to be fair, there is much in the field of jurisprudence that I didn't cover in my 2 sentence post. I wouldn't say that was in any way selective - rather law is a bit more complex than a 2 sentence post.
No no no. You don’t just get to weasel your way out of the corner you backed yourself into.
You might read at a 5th grade level, but the constitution is very simple.
32 -
head in sand wrote:
RockyG is either trolling or his brain doesn't work right.
I kinda feel like he's not trolling.
A lack of access to preferred gender.
12 -
Yawn^45 wrote:
crete wrote:
Well to be fair, there is much in the field of jurisprudence that I didn't cover in my 2 sentence post. I wouldn't say that was in any way selective - rather law is a bit more complex than a 2 sentence post.
No no no. You don’t just get to weasel your way out of the corner you backed yourself into.
You might read at a 5th grade level, but the constitution is very simple.
I can't tell if you're joking or not?
01 -
crete wrote:
Yawn^45 wrote:
No no no. You don’t just get to weasel your way out of the corner you backed yourself into.
You might read at a 5th grade level, but the constitution is very simple.
I can't tell if you're joking or not?
Nope.
Dead serious. If you can’t understand words like “shall not be infringed” then you don’t deserve to have any rights.
33 -
Yawn^45 wrote:
crete wrote:
I can't tell if you're joking or not?
Nope.
Dead serious. If you can’t understand words like “shall not be infringed” then you don’t deserve to have any rights.
Dude, it takes three years of study to get a law degree. There are reams of law, case law, etc. Picture the bookshelves of a law office, judges chambers, etc. I wrote a 2 sentence post. I didn't selectively leave out States rights - I actually left out literally everything!!! Where's your sense of humor?
44 -
Anti-gun protestors are storming the TN Capital. Based on recent history, it is a bad idea to attack the seat of government.
34 -
Uh oh libs, the trannies want guns to kill their cis oppressors. What is going to be your position - anti-gun or pro-trans???74
-
crete wrote:
Yawn^45 wrote:
Nope.
Dead serious. If you can’t understand words like “shall not be infringed” then you don’t deserve to have any rights.
Dude, it takes three years of study to get a law degree. There are reams of law, case law, etc. Picture the bookshelves of a law office, judges chambers, etc. I wrote a 2 sentence post. I didn't selectively leave out States rights - I actually left out literally everything!!! Where's your sense of humor?
If you think it takes 3 years to learn Constitutional law then you take the prize for fool of the day.
“but but but they have leather bound books”
So what. If I have a bookcase full of chemistry books does that make me a chemist?
my sense of humor doesn’t come into play in a thread about dead children. Sad that your does
24 -
Yawn^45 wrote:
crete wrote:
Dude, it takes three years of study to get a law degree. There are reams of law, case law, etc. Picture the bookshelves of a law office, judges chambers, etc. I wrote a 2 sentence post. I didn't selectively leave out States rights - I actually left out literally everything!!! Where's your sense of humor?
If you think it takes 3 years to learn Constitutional law then you take the prize for fool of the day.
“but but but they have leather bound books”
So what. If I have a bookcase full of chemistry books does that make me a chemist?
my sense of humor doesn’t come into play in a thread about dead children. Sad that your does
Bro, what are you smoking? This is what I posted:
"The constitution doesn't mention anywhere that I have a right to do a handstand. Can I assume that implies it is illegal to do a handstand?"
And you replied saying I had omitted parts of the Constitution related to states rights? Huh? And Constitutional Law? Whuh?
Seek help
22 -
Let it Rupp wrote:
Uh oh libs, the trannies want guns to kill their cis oppressors. What is going to be your position - anti-gun or pro-trans???Not a lib but I'll answer anyway. When it comes to what you evidently mean by those choices, I choose neither. Trans people have the same right to keep and bear arms as all other people. They also have the same right to commit murder and assault against their perceived enemies as all other people -- that is, none. Legitimate self-defense against an imminent threat is a different matter.
I'm not sure whether this "Trans Day of Vengeance" (the day after the more established Trans Day of Visibility) is actual violent nutjobs, a bunch of loudmouths who won't do anything, something being stirred up by agent provocateurs, or what, but I am sure that, in keeping with the calendar, anyone who gets violent using that as an excuse is a giant fool.
41 -
crete wrote:
Yawn^45 wrote:
If you think it takes 3 years to learn Constitutional law then you take the prize for fool of the day.
“but but but they have leather bound books”
So what. If I have a bookcase full of chemistry books does that make me a chemist?
my sense of humor doesn’t come into play in a thread about dead children. Sad that your does
Bro, what are you smoking? This is what I posted:
"The constitution doesn't mention anywhere that I have a right to do a handstand. Can I assume that implies it is illegal to do a handstand?"
And you replied saying I had omitted parts of the Constitution related to states rights? Huh? And Constitutional Law? Whuh?
Seek help
No one is fooled by this “I don’t get what you are saying” schtick.
I’ll just take the W though since you wanna play dumb.22 -
Jeff Wigand wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Well inserting that word over the actual Hebrew words changes the meaning of the text.
Of course, this is why there's multiple versions of every religion. Quibbling over translations.
Personally, I don't think you need ancient books to condemn abortion.
Abortion became an issue for religious conservative evangelicals when they realized that it could score points in politics. Randall Balmer wrote a piece last year ahead of the overturning of Roe on it.
W. A. Criswell was president of the Southern Baptist Convention and in 1973 said, “I have always felt that it was only after a child was born and had a life separate from its mother that it became an individual person, and it has always, therefore, seemed to me that what is best for the mother and for the future should be allowed.”
Carl F. H. Henry, founder of ‘Christianity Today,’ stated that, “a woman’s body is not the domain and property of others.” In 1968, the magazine held a conference among 26 Evangelical leaders who issued a statement on abortion that read, “Whether the performance of an induced abortion is sinful we are not agreed…but about the necessity of it and permissibility for it under certain circumstances we are in accord.”
James Dobson stated that the Bible made no comment on abortion and that it was tenable for a Christian to be believe that, “a developing embryo or fetus was not regarded as a full human being.”
Yes and besides that I think it would be normal that this be regulated respectively; also like gun control essays and papers because this would be a very good idea how we could avoid this problem of school shootings, I think it would not be normal that every person can get a shotgun and walk with it in the street, this is quite dangerous because there are already countless cases when this has led to many deaths.
Roe v Wade was decided in 1973 and yet Jerry Falwell didn’t have an anti-abortion sermon until 1978. What also happened in 1978? The midterm elections, and conservative evangelicals were rabid at having lost to evangelical liberal Jimmy Carter. One of their first test cases was in Minnesota for Walter Mondale’s open seat. The newly anti-abortion Republicans won Mondale’s former seat and their new cause had been found.
It is true that many conservative evangelicals did not initially view abortion as a major political issue in the early 1970s. Some leaders, such as W.A. Criswell and Carl F.H. Henry, expressed views that were more nuanced than the current conservative evangelical stance on abortion.
However, as the years went by, conservative evangelicals became increasingly concerned about abortion and its moral implications. Some scholars and observers have noted that this shift was partly driven by political calculations, as conservative evangelicals sought to mobilize their base and align themselves with the Republican Party.01 -
00
-
Was she a dem
21 -
transandgay wrote:
Was she a dem
Why?
01 -
Does it come with a happy ending wrote:
transandgay wrote:
Was she a dem
Why?
Because if it was a Trump supporter Trump would be blamed.
If it was a Muslim all of Islam would be blamed.
But as it was a transgender, then it's the NRA's fault.
That's why
62 -
rivaleehubka wrote:
Jeff Wigand wrote:
Abortion became an issue for religious conservative evangelicals when they realized that it could score points in politics. Randall Balmer wrote a piece last year ahead of the overturning of Roe on it.
W. A. Criswell was president of the Southern Baptist Convention and in 1973 said, “I have always felt that it was only after a child was born and had a life separate from its mother that it became an individual person, and it has always, therefore, seemed to me that what is best for the mother and for the future should be allowed.”
Carl F. H. Henry, founder of ‘Christianity Today,’ stated that, “a woman’s body is not the domain and property of others.” In 1968, the magazine held a conference among 26 Evangelical leaders who issued a statement on abortion that read, “Whether the performance of an induced abortion is sinful we are not agreed…but about the necessity of it and permissibility for it under certain circumstances we are in accord.”
James Dobson stated that the Bible made no comment on abortion and that it was tenable for a Christian to be believe that, “a developing embryo or fetus was not regarded as a full human being.”
Yes and besides that I think it would be normal that this be regulated respectively; also like gun control essays and papers because this would be a very good idea how we could avoid this problem of school shootings, I think it would not be normal that every person can get a shotgun and walk with it in the street, this is quite dangerous because there are already countless cases when this has led to many deaths.
Roe v Wade was decided in 1973 and yet Jerry Falwell didn’t have an anti-abortion sermon until 1978. What also happened in 1978? The midterm elections, and conservative evangelicals were rabid at having lost to evangelical liberal Jimmy Carter. One of their first test cases was in Minnesota for Walter Mondale’s open seat. The newly anti-abortion Republicans won Mondale’s former seat and their new cause had been found.
It is true that many conservative evangelicals did not initially view abortion as a major political issue in the early 1970s. Some leaders, such as W.A. Criswell and Carl F.H. Henry, expressed views that were more nuanced than the current conservative evangelical stance on abortion.
However, as the years went by, conservative evangelicals became increasingly concerned about abortion and its moral implications. Some scholars and observers have noted that this shift was partly driven by political calculations, as conservative evangelicals sought to mobilize their base and align themselves with the Republican Party.Or maybe they just saw photos and videos of abortions.
41 -
Your guns can't be regulated? Are you kidding? What does the plain text of the Second Amendment state? "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, ..." Regulation is written into the amendment. That's why for no part of U.S. history did the Supreme Court ever describe it as an individual right to bear arms until Heller.
12 -
Bloomberg didn't treat the police like his personal army. That's what Desantis wanted, proposing that Florida create a militia under his control alone. Bloomberg advocated arresting and harassing people in mass numbers via stop and frisk.
00
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.