A friend who works at the UofG said they thought they saw DST there today.
A friend who works at the UofG said they thought they saw DST there today.
levenegsp______ wrote:
A friend who works at the UofG said they thought they saw DST there today.
If he was canned and I assume escorted off campus with his box of relics, and no keys, why would he be there?
Phantom coaching?
Oh, I know, this is just a huge publicity stunt.
fred wrote:
levenegsp______ wrote:
A friend who works at the UofG said they thought they saw DST there today.
If he was canned and I assume escorted off campus with his box of relics, and no keys, why would he be there?
Phantom coaching?
Fred. And the Jim character. Why are you still posting here? Who are you? Why are you so invested in defending this person despite his behaviour?
@mods, what's the deal here?
jimmyx wrote:Otherwise he might as well just take the high road and let it all blow over and go away and move on with his life rather than keep it in the media spotlight by commenting.
DST I highly doubt he would get arrested if he returns to Canada, if he is in fact out of the country at the moment. What he did was not a crime, inappropriate as a club coach, yes for sure. But there were 2 people involved, and both had plenty of opportunities to walk away.
Seriously...it was a crime, she was under age. Your twisted view of the world isn’t relevant, the law says it was a crime. He might not be charged, but that doesn’t mean it wasn’t a crime.
And what high road can Dave take? He was forced into it? His lack of soy contributed to a high testosterone and he had no choice butt to give in to biology? What a load of BS. Please tell us who you are so we can make sure you are never involved in anything ever again.
levenegsp______ wrote:
fred wrote:
If he was canned and I assume escorted off campus with his box of relics, and no keys, why would he be there?
Phantom coaching?
Fred. And the Jim character. Why are you still posting here? Who are you? Why are you so invested in defending this person despite his behaviour?
@mods, what's the deal here?
You must be really stupid. I am not invested in defending this person. That ended with the Globe and Mail article. Did you smoke up in the past 2 days? Duh.
Are all millennials this brain dead?
BOHICA wrote:
Do you really? Both result from someone who is abusing their power and trust over a victim who will then wind up significantly traumatized. Just because you can be arrested for one and not the other doesn't mean that the latter scars the victim profoundly. We're talking real, human terms here, try to keep up. You quoted out of context to twist meaning, don't let being upset at what you see lead you to be disingenuous. There are a lot of people saying awful, thoughtless, and unreasonable things on this thread, polevaultpower isn't one of them.
^This. Also as a reminder, Mary wasn't fat, she was just slightly above ideal race weight, and Sleazy Sal didn't just call her fat, but her "ass" and that of her female colleagues with the obvious sexual undertones, repeatedly and publicly.
Middle aged coaches abusing female teenagers, disgusting. Both scenarios resulted in suicidal thoughts, with Megan actually ending up hospitalized, and Mary cutting herself.
Finally, Salazar got banned (provisionally at the moment), and DST fired for it. I hope there will be more consequences for these two abusers.
As we just read from Megan herself:
“This is how abuse of power works–the one in a place of power stays protected by the victim because the victim has too much to lose in speaking the truth,” she said. “The victim is the one who suffers, who is ostracized, who is labelled, who is forced to rebuild their life, while the person in power continues to reap the benefits of their power.
“If I had nothing to lose, Dave wouldn’t have had this kind of power over me. And that’s why I’m finally ready to share the truth.”
you stupid loser he attacked her and choked her!!!
that is a crime
Does anyone have a link to a one page summary from safesport for guidelines.? I wanted to show it to a friend of mine but can’t find the link.
Update: Never mind, it was something I read on facebook and not here.
Here it is:
Here's what I think. Some people who are traumatized themselves, read a few lines here, and then are triggered. They don't actually attempt to scrutinize the content of the statements; they just go off, and need a focal point to dump their emotional content. It's an amygdala response,
Yes, MG was violated. Hello she was violated. Why were the police not contacted by the caregivers?
You are wrong. It was not a crime or he would be charged. Do you really think such a high profile article would go unpunished if it were a crime? The chief of police would be removed from his duties if he chose not to prosecute such an open and shut case in your opinion.
jimmyx wrote:
You are wrong. It was not a crime or he would be charged. Do you really think such a high profile article would go unpunished if it were a crime? The chief of police would be removed from his duties if he chose not to prosecute such an open and shut case in your opinion.
It took a little while for Cosby and Weinstein to be charged. Maybe give it a little longer than a few days.
jimmyx wrote:
You are wrong. It was not a crime or he would be charged. Do you really think such a high profile article would go unpunished if it were a crime? The chief of police would be removed from his duties if he chose not to prosecute such an open and shut case in your opinion.
Do you think he’s sitting at home sipping whisky and chatting with his wife and daughters? Since it was just a minor error of judgement, I’m sure they won’t even need to forgive him. Of course, his daughters are the same age as MB was, so I’m sure that’ll be a little awkward...
Guelph Alum wrote:There is corroborating evidence that there was a sexual relationship..
What is the corroborating evidence of a sexual relationship?
From what I heard the police already said there was no crime, and they will not be getting involved...Am I wrong on that?
A quick google search led me to this "Const. Kyle Grant from the Guelph police sent a message via email saying there is no investigation ongoing at this point".
Stop being so obtuse. That was before the story came out. Let’s wait and see if they think rape charges are warranted.
You can look at the dates...Police have been aware of the story for awhile...Its not rape, and vaguely falls into the person of authority with someone over 16 and under 18...its not worth their time, he would be found not guilty...and for MBs future civil suit, its better to have the threat of criminal charges and also not having the criminal charges beaten in court...
It VAGUELY falls into "the person of authority" category? Are you kidding me? Did you even READ the Globe and Mail article? Are you aware that MB was 17 to DST's 39 and was intentionally grooming a vulnerable young girl following the death of her mother? Is that VAGUE to you?
Here's what we know from Jimbos other posts
He claims to:
1. Have trained with and competed against MB
2. Coached against DST
3. Coached in the OUA
4. No longer coach in the OUA.
Shouldn't be too hard to figure out who he is.
We know exactly who Fred is; he is just shameless.
He could be 39 or 75 it doesnt matter...its still not illegal...its just in violation of his work contract which has vague legal terms such as 'anything causing disrepute to the university image'