They knew it they just didn't realize that abortion of convenience was going to be the new norm until they saw the giant spike in abortions that occurred in the 1970s.
Is that what James Dobson said in 1973? “a developing embryo or fetus was not regarded as a full human being (unless there are a lot of them in the next few years)”
This isn’t difficult to understand. These people didn’t have a change of heart. They found an issue they could capitalize on.
In the 1960s, Planned Parenthood admitted that direct abortion kills, something it is loathe to admit now. And in the 1990s, Kate Michelman, then head of NARAL (National Abortion Rights Action League), very publicly called abortion a bad thing.
This thread is heading into Hall of Fame territory, it's even awful by letsrun standards and that is as a low bar as you can get. I think Rocky takes the cake in this thread but newname/unkle/carmine has a longer history. Adult/(who is likely DiscoGary/Ghost of Disco Gary--same level of paranoid pedantry and similar posting styles) makes the trifecta. Backed by KripsyK. Wow guys, can't make this stuff up. And on a running forum of all places.
Why do people like you think you are saying something profound here?
This thread is heading into Hall of Fame territory, it's even awful by letsrun standards and that is as a low bar as you can get. I think Rocky takes the cake in this thread but newname/unkle/carmine has a longer history. Adult/(who is likely DiscoGary/Ghost of Disco Gary--same level of paranoid pedantry and similar posting styles) makes the trifecta. Backed by KripsyK. Wow guys, can't make this stuff up. And on a running forum of all places.
Why do people like you think you are saying something profound here?
To a narcissist nothing is more profound than their own opinions.
This thread is heading into Hall of Fame territory, it's even awful by letsrun standards and that is as a low bar as you can get. I think Rocky takes the cake in this thread but newname/unkle/carmine has a longer history. Adult/(who is likely DiscoGary/Ghost of Disco Gary--same level of paranoid pedantry and similar posting styles) makes the trifecta. Backed by KripsyK. Wow guys, can't make this stuff up. And on a running forum of all places.
I'm glad you're beside yourself. I hope you crap your drawers
Whitehouse: “our hearts go out to the trans community- as they are under attack right now”.
Did a trans school get shot up by a mentally ill Christian Extremist, or did I miss something? I just can’t hardly take this junk anymore. Wtf is wrong with these people? It’s completely nonsensical. It’s hard to tell what is parody and what is actual reality anymore.
I have zero problems with anything he stated. Speak to yourself if you don't like it then don't read it.
Self described marginalized white males have many problems involving what was stated. Maybe RockyG is Matt Gaetz. That might explain the insane amount of time he has to respond on this thread during “work hours”.
We can't regulate AR14 because the guys in Powdered wigs said so 225 years ago. And they were much closer to Jesus than we are today. So by extension, we know that Jesus says AR14 are good. Therefore it is my God given right to have this gun regardless of how many innocents get slaughtered.
(thinking...probably had it coming to them anyway because of having godless lib parents).
This schizo guy is perfectly willing to argue with you that the guys with powdered wigs over 225 years ago wrote a constitution that includes the right to abort children, the right to cross the border with no papers, the right to same sex marriage, and to do drugs, and every other scum policy he wants. "It's all in there! We are becoming the perfect union the founders anticipated!'
The constitution doesn't mention anywhere that I have a right to do a handstand. Can I assume that implies it is illegal to do a handstand?
The constitution doesn't mention anywhere that I have a right to do a handstand. Can I assume that implies it is illegal to do a handstand?
Constitution mentions passing legislation for things for the general welfare of the country, which would include restricting immigration with rules, or preventing criminal Acts, and guaranteeing life. You're arguing theres restrictions against doing that in there? Those would have to be guarantees like the right to bear arms or the right to petition. Or right to a trial. Limits on passing legislation regulating those things are clearly stated.
Where's the list of guarantees to be free from govt limits for perverts to sexually harass kids or for people to murder babies? Where does it say the government can't regulate marriage?
I clearly can spot a clause in the Constitution that says there's no ex post facto laws or that they can't quarter a soldier in my home during peacetime.
I see No clauses with limits about legislation protecting children, or regulating a border. Or limiting drug use. You zombie pot head.
Additionally, they know that even more sane and reasonable people will leave teaching - this is part of the their multi-pronged approach to kill public education. And ensure an ignorant and uneducated population of mouth breathing sheep they can rule in an authoritarian manner.
Lol ignorant. You want freaks teaching our kids insane ideas.
I'm not against public Ed. I'm for a takeover of it. Screw home schooling. Why should we leave the system and let you sicko liberals run it?
Anyone who advocates for home school is a quitter and wants to let liberals dominate public education unrestricted.
Whether a person has a kid or a wife doesn't discount the fact that they have an interest in the education of population around them in the country. We live in a society.
The constitution doesn't mention anywhere that I have a right to do a handstand. Can I assume that implies it is illegal to do a handstand?
Constitution mentions passing legislation for things for the general welfare of the country, which would include restricting immigration with rules, or preventing criminal Acts, and guaranteeing life. You're arguing theres restrictions against doing that in there? Those would have to be guarantees like the right to bear arms or the right to petition. Or right to a trial. Limits on passing legislation regulating those things are clearly stated.
Where's the list of guarantees to be free from govt limits for perverts to sexually harass kids or for people to murder babies? Where does it say the government can't regulate marriage?
I clearly can spot a clause in the Constitution that says there's no ex post facto laws or that they can't quarter a soldier in my home during peacetime.
I see No clauses with limits about legislation protecting children, or regulating a border. Or limiting drug use. You zombie pot head.
Sigh. Re-read your post I replied to.
But regardless, law makers HAVE passed law on these things you're getting paranoid about. It is not legal to molest a child. I'm kinda suprised you don't know that? Here's some info on federal and state laws to protect children fyi: .
The U.S. Constitution vests all federal legislative power in the U.S. Congress. Congress exercises this power by enacting public and private laws. A U.S. public law is a federal law that has genera
My point was if you talk to liberals they act like there's restrictions in the Constitution against the government passing laws limiting insane things. As though there's a guaranteed right somewhere in there to act like human filth on countless issues that liberals want people to be free to act like human filth
This schizo guy is perfectly willing to argue with you that the guys with powdered wigs over 225 years ago wrote a constitution that includes the right to abort children, the right to cross the border with no papers, the right to same sex marriage, and to do drugs, and every other scum policy he wants. "It's all in there! We are becoming the perfect union the founders anticipated!'
The constitution doesn't mention anywhere that I have a right to do a handstand. Can I assume that implies it is illegal to do a handstand?
You conveniently skipped the part of the constitution that’s states powers not granted to the federal government in the document are given to the states. This means that anyway who isn’t a mouth breather knows my guns cannot be regulated while the ability to kill unborn children in the room is a state level call.
The constitution doesn't mention anywhere that I have a right to do a handstand. Can I assume that implies it is illegal to do a handstand?
You conveniently skipped the part of the constitution that’s states powers not granted to the federal government in the document are given to the states. This means that anyway who isn’t a mouth breather knows my guns cannot be regulated while the ability to kill unborn children in the room is a state level call.
Well to be fair, there is much in the field of jurisprudence that I didn't cover in my 2 sentence post. I wouldn't say that was in any way selective - rather law is a bit more complex than a 2 sentence post.
