Flagpole wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Yes you do. Just this week you jumped on the Avennati claim. It seems like even the most bizarre theories you fall for. Cleary you are extremely partisan and emotionallly locked to your biases.
You are an idiot. I was all for Gorsuch being seated...elections have consequences which I accept, and while I wouldn't have picked him, even though he's a conservative, he hasn't shown any outrageous behavior that would disqualify him for the Supreme Court.
What we have here is a guy who McConnell is trying to ram through despite him not allowing Merrick Garland to even have a hearing. Now, that would be dirty pool right there, BUT Democrats would have to suck on that because that's how the system works. Democrats now have a right to do the same thing if it happens again but the tables are turned.
Back to Kavanaugh...
He has THREE accusations of sexual assault against him from women who have come forward and given their names. We have only heard from one of them, and we didn't get to hear from all the supposed witnesses in her case.
He has TWO other accusations that have been brought against him from unnamed people involving sexual assault, one of them being a rape.
Mark Judge has been named in THREE of these accusations. Why are Republicans against hearing from him?
We have students at Yale saying that Kavanaugh was a heavy drinking drunk in college and not the choir boy he has tried to represent himself as.
So, Kavanaugh said time and again, "ask people who know me". Ok...lots of Yale students including one of his roomates say he was a HUGE drinking drunk, so a LIE from Kavanaugh. We have THREE women who knew him who say he sexually assaulted them. We have TWO other women who have not given their names who said he sexually assaulted them.
Knowing that women don't typically want to come out about these types of allegations (actually men too), how many others are out there?
I'm not even saying he's for sure guilty, just that these are credible allegations from credible women and that a further investigation is warranted.
Avenatti is known as someone who very carefully vets clients he takes on. He had a few women approach him about Trump whom he didn't take on because they didn't vet well. He is very forceful in saying that Julie Swetnick was assaulted by Kavanaugh and that they have corroborating witnesses.
All of it deserves to be looked at.
If you want to be mad at Democrats, then be mad about how Dr. Ford's name was leaked, because it is highly likely that came from a Democrat, and THAT is dirty pool, and I do not support how that came about at all, EVEN IF it ultimately leads to Kavanaugh not being confirmed.
BUT, the allegations themselves deserve to be looked at...all very credible.
I look at facts and evidence and am perhaps the least partisan regular poster here. I've said many times that John Kasich would make a great president for example, and I've said many times that Hillary was a greatly flawed candidate.
Anyone who supports Trump at all or Kavanaugh BLINDLY is an extremely biased partisan. I am not...
...unless you think for some reason that only Democrats can care about respecting women and hearing women. If that's what you mean by being partisan, then I plead guilty.