Christian School Shooting in Nashville

People were unaware of miscarriages 2,000 years ago?

Or they knew about them just had no word for it?

Well inserting that word over the actual Hebrew words changes the meaning of the text.

Of course, this is why there's multiple versions of every religion. Quibbling over translations.

Personally, I don't think you need ancient books to condemn abortion.

What is it with all these anti-religion liberals trying to argue out the abortion issue from a religious angle? Like they care about that stuff in the first place.

Does anybody really think that they feel that religion is the way to sort this out? They're paranoid about theocracy, yet they keep bringing religion into plocy discussions to tell you that in order for us to be more religious, you have to see it their way. As though they are pro-religion when it comes to constructing policies.

I never suggested or mentioned banning anything.

Combine RockyG’s posts to make a “classic” manifesto.

Whatever, you gas lighter. You'll probably be in agreement with everything said in that transgender shooters manifesto. People already pointed out that you freaks were going to start to justify the actions that his shooter and blame the victims and you're already doing that.

Agreed

They all agree with it that's why the manifesto will never see the light of day.

If it was a M@GA screed they'd be handing it out on street corners and running it 24/7.

People like this clown think the real victim in the shooting is the shooter.

The entire left is just as mentally ill as that literally d*ckless shooter.

twitchy.com

EPIC receipt-filled thread just decimates media/Dems/Lefties making Nashville trans-shooter the VICTIM

@Politibunny

You guys! Stop picking on the trans-shooter! She's the real victim!

Link:twitchy.com/samj-3930/2023/03/30/epic-...

Yea, exactly.

Soon on the way...

"It was a mostly peaceful shooting"

No, it's that you misinterpret your own religious arguments.

Take your favorite topic - homosexuality. It's often thought the Bible says it's sinful as "You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination."

However, in the original Hebrew language the Bible was written in, it's more accurately translated as "lie with a male in the bed of a woman" (i.e. a marriage bed), meaning it's an abomination for a man to be adulterous with a man, not a rejection of homosexuality entirely.

It's subtle translation errors like this, that change the argument entirely.

Like James Hodgkinson’s writings after he shot Steve Scalise. They were never published in the media. Oh wait:

amp.cnn.com

Suspect in congressional shooting was Bernie Sanders supporter, strongly anti-Trump

James T. Hodgkinson, the man identified as shooting a Republican member of congress and four others on Wednesday morning, was a small business owner in Illinois who defined himself publicly by his firm support of Bernie Sande...

Link:amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/06/14/homepage2/j...

A more logical person would argue that Jewish and Christian behavior over the last few thousands years were more indicative of what they text meant than your 21st century opinion.

If your argument had any validity to it at all homosexuality would have been accepted in the early days. It was not.

The Old Testament in Hebrew says "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind; it is detestable."

That seems pretty straight forward.

2017 was a long time ago.

If you think the current media is still doing journalism you're kidding yourself.

There was no manifesto in there either it was all gleaned from his social media.

Nowadays they scrub the social media as fast as they can particularly if it doesn't fit the narrative.

Abortion became an issue for religious conservative evangelicals when they realized that it could score points in politics. Randall Balmer wrote a piece last year ahead of the overturning of Roe on it.

W. A. Criswell was president of the Southern Baptist Convention and in 1973 said, “I have always felt that it was only after a child was born and had a life separate from its mother that it became an individual person, and it has always, therefore, seemed to me that what is best for the mother and for the future should be allowed.”

Carl F. H. Henry, founder of ‘Christianity Today,’ stated that, “a woman’s body is not the domain and property of others.” In 1968, the magazine held a conference among 26 Evangelical leaders who issued a statement on abortion that read, “Whether the performance of an induced abortion is sinful we are not agreed…but about the necessity of it and permissibility for it under certain circumstances we are in accord.”

James Dobson stated that the Bible made no comment on abortion and that it was tenable for a Christian to be believe that, “a developing embryo or fetus was not regarded as a full human being.”

Roe v Wade was decided in 1973 and yet Jerry Falwell didn’t have an anti-abortion sermon until 1978. What also happened in 1978? The midterm elections, and conservative evangelicals were rabid at having lost to evangelical liberal Jimmy Carter. One of their first test cases was in Minnesota for Walter Mondale’s open seat. The newly anti-abortion Republicans won Mondale’s former seat and their new cause had been found.

What difference does that make to you? Do you want to correct the record on religion or something? Why? We're talking about political policies here, legal policies. If you don't think religion should have anything to do with laws, why are you jumping in the religious argument?

One minute you don't want theocracy, and the next minute you act like you actually do, but we need to get it right.

You psychopaths

You’re right. So much as changed since the Astros won the World Series. Ancient history.

”They” really are in charge. “They” won’t even let you click on that link or let you know that he was a rabid Bernie supporter. “They” won’t let you know any of it.

The psychopath, RockyG, has written more about sexual acts in the last three days than he’s committed with a willing human in his entire life.

When I read Rocky's posts it reminds me exactly of the characters in a Steven King novel.

Anyway, Back to the topic at hand. Are we getting closer to stopping these mass shootings after 42 pages? More use of thoughts and prayers? How about more guns? Better doors? Returning Prayer to school? Ridding the world of homosexuality?

I feel we are right on the cusp of cracking the code on this one. These are great suggestions.

Those people you are referring to in this situation are called "Police Officers".