January 6 Hearing

All democrats are disgusting pieces of trash.

Your video proves my point. He was never handcuffed. He was never even led anywhere. He was forced to stand outside the house in his boxers. That's not a perp walk. That's just getting served with a search warrant.

You made the same mistake that Gary makes every day. You saw a picture with a caption and you drew the wrong conclusion.

It's OK. We all make mistakes, but not as often as Gary.

Further proof, if any were needed, that the US is finished as a unified nation.

From Wikipedia: perp-walk

"an instance of a person in police custody being led into a police station, courthouse, etc. in such a way as to enable the media to publicize the event."

You lose. He stood in his driveway and never left the property. There was NO perp-walk. Again, take the "L" and move on.

Look, Fats, you don't need handcuffs to have a perp-walk. You don't even need handcuffs for a perp-arrest or a perp-slam.

Jeff Clark was directed by law enforcement to walk in his underwear and bonk socks out of his domicile and then led to the driveway, where he was surrounded by slobbering federal goons. The underwear march commanded by agents was in full public view. Every Tom, Dick and Harry in the goddam neighborhood could see Clark walking in his underwear. Clark was restricted and denied access to his alleged house. He could not put his pants on, despite his pleas. Those are all the elements of humiliation and authority control needed to legally constitute a Fourth Amendment perp-walk in America.

And who the hell is Gary?

Nope. You refuse to accept that Biden is senile despite all the evidence. You continue to praise the failure of this clown administration and continue to celebrate soaring energy prices.

Mr. "end of quote/repeat the line" will go on an EO craze as soon as he loses the Congressional majority.

Oh, you're the Gary? I didn't know who the hell Fatso was name-dropping. I thought you were Disco. Disco bango. Disco socko. Disco ducko. Quack quack! He stepped on a duck!

Some of us don't live and die by what Wikipedia says. Some of us apply common sense to analytical legal issues. To prove a perp-walk in America, you have to show (1) government control, (2) humiliation and (3) movement. We undeniably have all perp-walk three elements here. Jeff Clark was prodded, commanded and directed by booted government agents to walk in his underwear from his house to his public sphere driveway. He was denied access to his pants and his house. He walked in his underwear, in humiliating public view, to his driveway where he continued to have his rights restricted. Classic perp-walk, Gary Disco.

AKA Rigged For Hillary.

Had to change his username after Biden destroyed Trump.

Trump is corrupt. A very bad person. no more information needed

That's your problem. You accept ideas despite the evidence.

I accept ideas because of evidence.

With that level of political analysis, you'd be great in an anchor role on Fox

These "hearings" are a clown show. Do better Libs!

Congressional committees should not be split up into "sides". They should be committed to gathering facts and making recommendations that are beneficial to the American people.

It's unfortunate that today's congressional committees are only about infighting. This is a major problem with our government.

The January 6 committee is a model for the way all congressional committees should do business.

I have not watched much of the hearings but I believe there is no cross-examination. What kind of a hearing would not allow cross-examination. Those being accused of something should have the opportunity to defend himself or herself. Otherwise, it is not a fair process.

Rs decided not to participate in the committee. Pretty dumb move if you ask me. Take it up with them.

Hearings never have cross-examination. Cross-examination is reserved for when you are conducting a trial.

Yea, even Trump has been complaining that the R's screwed up here.

Exactly.

The Republicans CHOSE to sit this out. The Dems wisely chose people who want to get to the bottom of what happened on the 6th and chose two Republicans to be a part of that process.

This is a hearing, not a trial. There literally is no such thing as direct or cross examination in a Congressional Hearing. The fact that people think there is such a thing as cross examination in such a hearing points to both their lack of education and to Washington's typical failure to run meaningful, fact-finding hearings.

To the complaint that this is all "one sided," I will agree that it is one sided. And that "side" is the side of honest Republicans. Every person who has testified is a Republican, telling the truth under oath. This cannot be stressed enough. The ONE SIDE (!!!!) that is laying the groundwork for an indictment of Donald Trump is the Republican side.

Finally, If Donald Trump wants to present his side, I'm sure that the Committee would love to have him do so, under oath.