Official LRC President Joseph R Biden Thread

Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:

It was sourced from a CDC study, dummy. Try again.

https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html

The lying "California Globe" MISREPORTED the CDC's notice and created a LYING headline, numbnuts. And you bought it, OF COURSE, because it seemed to say what you *wanted* to be true.

As Fat Hurts has pointed out, the phasing out of the test (not immediately, but by the end of the year) is NOT "because they can’t differentiate between COVID and flu." As a high school graduate I was able to read and understand the "Lab Alert" that you linked to, which does NOT say or imply that a current test can't distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 and flu viruses--you know, given that those are very, very different viruses.

erah wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

It's August. Do you know what that means?

Hey, I'd forgotten! Now, what day was Donald Trump supposed to be re-installed in the presidency? Was it the 13th?

I'm trying to remember, so I can know what day to laugh loudly at the deluded trumpkins.

You got it!!!!

I think they just gave the month and not the day. They said Trump will be reinstated in August.

So it could be any time now. Gary is so excited he can't eat or sleep.

Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:

erah wrote:

And regarding the "California Globe":

Overall, we rate the California Globe Right-Center biased . . . and Mixed for factual reporting due to the occasional use of poor sources and failed fact checks.

Failed Fact Checks

California Senate Bill 145 would shield pedophiles who rape children from having to register as sex offenders. – Mostly False

New CDC Study Finds Majority of Those Infected with COVID-19 ‘Always’ Wore Masks – Unsupported

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/california-globe/

It was sourced from a CDC study, dummy. Try again.

https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html

The CDC did not say the old PCR tests are faulty, dummy. Read what I already posted about this.

Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E7rJ2vJXIAEtzlX?format=jpg&name=small

The fear porn never ends with you clueless libs.

Speaking of "clueless": A 99.9% survival rate (we'll ignore the terribly sick, the people crippled for life, those who have to get lung transplants, etc., and just focus on deaths) would mean that, out of those who get the virus, only one in a thousand dies.

Well, the USA has, what, about a third of a billion residents? So if ALL of them were infected (which we know is not true), and only one in a thousand died, then about a third of a million would have died.

Oh, but nearly TWICE that many have died already--even though only 10-15% have actually been infected. So the "99.9% survival rate" is bullsh!t, and you're either too naturally dumb to have worked that out yourself, or you're being dumb on purpose: a troll. Either way, I'm done with you. I ordinarily woudn't even give a troll this much satisfaction, but the LIES AND FVCKING BULLSH!T you post are contributing to illness and death, asshoIe.

erah wrote:

Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:

It was sourced from a CDC study, dummy. Try again.

https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html

The lying "California Globe" MISREPORTED the CDC's notice and created a LYING headline, numbnuts. And you bought it, OF COURSE, because it seemed to say what you *wanted* to be true.

As Fat Hurts has pointed out, the phasing out of the test (not immediately, but by the end of the year) is NOT "because they can’t differentiate between COVID and flu." As a high school graduate I was able to read and understand the "Lab Alert" that you linked to, which does NOT say or imply that a current test can't distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 and flu viruses--you know, given that those are very, very different viruses.

https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/eua-withdrawal-for-cdc-covid-19-pcr-test-is-due-to-the-development-of-newer-tests-that-help-save-time-and-resources-not-because-the-test-is-faulty/

The PCR test cannot identify the delta variant either. Again, you focus on the cases and not on the death rates. The fear porn never stops.

Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E7rJ2vJXIAEtzlX?format=jpg&name=small

The fear porn never ends with you clueless libs.

If you were going on a type plane that crashes every 1 of 1000 flights, would you take the trip?

That's what 99.9% survival rate means. And chances are very good that you will catch covid at some point, so if you don't take the vaccine you have already decided to get on the plane.

erah wrote:

. . . So the "99.9% survival rate" is bullsh!t, and you're either too naturally dumb to have worked that out yourself, or you're being dumb on purpose: a troll. Either way, I'm done with you. I ordinarily woudn't even give a troll this much satisfaction, but the LIES AND FVCKING BULLSH!T you post are contributing to illness and death, asshoIe.

Hey, come on, dude - don't be pulling your punches. Tell us what you REALLY think.

Soooo triggered! Continue with your fear porn and keep bending over for Fauci.

just a reminder that Donald J Trump ordered the federal Department of Justice, which reported to Trump, to falsify evidence and claim that the election was fraudulent. So Spanky could do the rest.

And yeah he's an unindicted felon.

And a third of the nation likes the guy.

agip wrote:

just a reminder that Donald J Trump ordered the federal Department of Justice, which reported to Trump, to falsify evidence and claim that the election was fraudulent. So Spanky could do the rest.

And yeah he's an unindicted felon.

And a third of the nation likes the guy.

Biden got over 8M fraudulent votes, per Seth Keshel former Army Intelligence Officer & Analytics expert.

"Here is a tale of the tape for Excess Biden Votes based on trend analysis in the modern political era, considering population growth/decline, recent voter history, and registration information, including registration by party.

My estimates are always lenient, and do not account for cyber flipping of votes.

Trump won: PA, MI, WI, NV, AZ, GA, MN

Likely/Possible Trump if cyber flipping occurring: NM, VA, CO, NJ, NH

Closer than you thought: WA, OR, RI, CT, HI"

10 INDISPUTABLE FACTS on the 2020 election that argue for audits (link below).

1. Bellwether counties: In 2020, former President Donald J. Trump carried 18 of 19 “bellwether” counties (losing only Clallam County, Washington state). The term “bellwether” in the political arena refers to a county or state that aligns itself with the ultimate winner of an election.

Political realignments (gerrymandering of districts for instance) can cause some counties or states to lose “bellwether” status over time. From 1980 to 2016, 19 counties, most of them industrial counties in the northern and midwestern United States, voted for the winner of all 10 presidential elections. Additionally, since 1936, a key bellwether county, Luzerne County of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, has gone to the winner of Pennsylvania, regardless of party.

In 2016 and 2020, Trump won that county handily. Any Republican winning Luzerne County in that time frame (since 1936) has also never failed to carry the state of Michigan.

2. Bellwether states: In 2020, Trump carried four vital bellwether states (Ohio, Iowa, North Carolina and Florida). These states represent a strong base consisting of urban, suburban, rural, union and ethnic minority voters. Additionally, these states have been won by the same candidate 13 times since 1896, and every single time, that candidate won either the presidency or their re-election.

Related: Bob Ehrlich: There's 1 Simple Way to Secure Our Vote, But the Left Will Never Allow It

Bellwether states also come in and out of existence with demographic realignments. For instance, in 2000, George W. Bush became the first Republican to win the presidency without carrying Vermont or Illinois. On all but two occasions since 1896, Ohio’s electoral votes went to the ultimate winner of the presidency. Trump overwhelmingly won Ohio in 2020.

3. Share of primary votes: Share of primary votes during the primary elections is a way to judge outcomes of presidential elections.

Since presidential primaries began in 1912, only four incumbents have lost re-election, all garnering 72.8 percent of the primary vote or less. Herbert Hoover lost in 1932 after earning 36.0 percent in the Republican primaries, Gerald Ford lost in 1976 after earning 53.3 percent, Jimmy Carter (a Democratic incumbent) lost in 1980 after earning 51.1 percent, and George H.W. Bush lost in 1992 after earning 72.8 percent.

The most dominant Republican landslide re-elections in this time frame were won by Dwight Eisenhower (1956, 85.9 percent primary share), Richard Nixon (1972, 86.9 percent) and Ronald Reagan (1984, 98.8 percent). Trump won 94.0 percent in 2020.

In contrast, Joe Biden was trounced in the 2020 Democratic primaries in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada — the traditional indicators of general election viability. His running mate, Kamala Harris, dropped out before primary voting even began.

4. Incumbents who gain votes win: Incumbent vote gain is another key indicator of presidential race outcomes. Since 1892, and as the expansion of the United States slowed, only six presidents have lost re-election. All six had fewer total votes in their re-election campaigns than in their initial campaigns. All incumbents who gained votes won re-election.

In 2020, Trump gained a record 11 million votes. For perspective, former President Barack Obama lost 4 million votes nationally in 2012 and still won re-election.

5. Voter registration by party: Voter registration by party is touted as one of the most accurate predictors of determining presidential election outcomes. Not all states register voters by party, but for those that do, the evidence is plain to see.

As far back as records are publicly available, three of the key states in the 2020 election — Pennsylvania, Florida and North Carolina — have moved in favor of the same party that made overall registration gains since 2000. In Pennsylvania, from 2012 to 2016, 60 of 67 counties trended more Republican in registration, suggesting a major GOP gain in the state — consequently, Pennsylvania flipped for Trump in 2016.

A legitimate Trump loss in Pennsylvania would show a registration lead expansion for Democrats. However, from 2016 to 2020, 60 of 67 counties became more Republican in registration once again, with the GOP registering roughly 242,000 net new voters, compared to just 12,000 for Democrats.

This number suggests that the margin of victory for Trump should have substantially increased.

6. Down-ballot voting: House of Representatives down-ballot voting is an indicator of success for the top of the ticket.

When Obama won a landslide victory in 2008, the Democrats took 14 U.S. House seats away from Republican incumbents, while losing only five seats. When Reagan was elected in 1980, the Republicans gained a net of 34 seats. When Reagan was re-elected, Republicans clawed back a net of 16 House seats from the 26 lost in the 1982 midterms.

In 2020, with Trump at the top of the ticket, Republicans knocked out 13 incumbent Democratic seats, while not losing a single Republican-held seat. Common sense suggests a Biden electoral landslide would have taken at least a single Republican seat with it.

7. Florida as a key trend indicator: Why is Florida such an important indicator of presidential election success? Since 1932, Florida’s trajectory has correlated perfectly with the trajectory of Michigan and Pennsylvania as a reflection of working-class political sentiment.

In every single election since then, if Florida became more Republican from the previous election, Michigan and Pennsylvania did exactly the same. These three states also largely move together to the left when Democratic nominees make gains.

In 2020, Trump won Florida by a margin greater than 2 percentage points higher than he did in 2016. Despite a massive Republican registration advantage in Pennsylvania, both Pennsylvania and Michigan charted a separate direction from Florida for the first time in nearly a century.

8. Gaining everywhere but losing everything: Despite historic strength and gains of Trump in battleground states and battleground counties, Trump “lost.”

Maricopa County, Arizona, which casts nearly two-thirds of all votes in Arizona, has not voted for the Democratic nominee since it supported Harry Truman in 1948. In 1996, Bob Dole became the first Republican in nearly 50 years to lose Arizona, but he still won Maricopa County.

Trump carried the county by 3 percentage points in 2016 while receiving fewer votes than Mitt Romney had in the county in 2012. In 2020, Trump set a Republican record for net additional votes in Maricopa County by adding roughly 248,000 from his 2016 performance, only to become the first Republican nominee (and incumbent president) to lose the county in 72 years.

That was accomplished by Biden’s gain of nearly 338,000 net “new votes” from 2016, which is nearly three times higher than the all-time previous high Democratic vote gain in the county by John Kerry in 2004. Similar record high vote totals and increases for Trump were also eclipsed in 2020 in the states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Nevada and Minnesota, in “losing efforts.”

9. Victory goes to the minority vote-getter: Trump achieved historic improvements with minority voters across the nation.

Trump netted more than one-quarter of the non-white vote in his re-election campaign, achieving a level of minority support seen just one time since Nixon’s 1960 campaign. His progress was evident in urban areas in the Midwest, such as Wayne County, Michigan; southern Texas, where Trump won counties that had been in the Democratic column for decades; and perhaps most notably, in Miami-Dade County, Florida.

Trump’s vote increases in long-held Republican suburban counties, and in working-class counties like Mahoning County, Ohio (which he flipped for the first time since 1972), indicate that his white support did not collapse as reported by the mainstream media. The absence of millions of core Democratic base minority voters raises considerable questions as to how Biden was able to surpass Obama’s popular vote record by 12 million.

10. 2020 was “the most secure presidential election in U.S. history”: Post-election behavior by politicians on both sides and their mainstream media and Big Tech allies is beyond contemptible.

In 2016, with narrow margins in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, Trump’s camp had no concern over recounts or potential audits in any of those three states that decided the election. Biden’s certified margins in Pennsylvania and Michigan are much larger than the margins in those states in 2016, but opposition to full forensic audits either statewide or in suspect counties has turned into an all-out legal and ideological war in 2021 (sometimes referred to as “lawfare”).

If Biden’s team was 100 percent confident they won the election fair and square, then they should feel there is nothing to hide. Audits confirming his certified totals would certainly solidify his administration and simultaneously deal an embarrassing defeat to election skeptics.

Instead, the establishment media insists that, despite thousands of affidavits and personal accounts describing fraud along with the recent Arizona state Senate hearing on Maricopa County’s audit, the 2020 election was “the most secure in U.S. history.”

Democratic secretaries of state are running cover as well. In one example of many, the Colorado secretary of state recently acted outside of her authority, effectively banning audits in the state. The single biggest question to ask all states’ legislatures is this: If your candidate won hands-down and there is nothing to hide, why not conduct a full forensic audit of several of your states’ counties?

A sacrosanct element within our constitutional republic is the privilege, the right and the act of voting for our elected leaders. The American people have taken many of our rights and responsibilities for granted far too long, and this past presidential election clearly woke us up to that fact.

Maybe what is needed now in America is for us all to stop taking our freedoms for granted.

What might be the eventual outcome of the 2020 election, only God knows. I can say, as one who is paying very close attention to it from the very outset, that the confusion, the complexity and the deception by many in the media and within our very own government doesn’t offer the citizenry of our great republic any sense of confidence.

https://www.westernjournal.com/gen-flynn-exclusive-10-indisputable-facts-2020-election-argue-audits/

Real Obvi wrote:

erah wrote:

. . . So the "99.9% survival rate" is bullsh!t, and you're either too naturally dumb to have worked that out yourself, or you're being dumb on purpose: a troll. Either way, I'm done with you. I ordinarily woudn't even give a troll this much satisfaction, but the LIES AND FVCKING BULLSH!T you post are contributing to illness and death, asshoIe.

Hey, come on, dude - don't be pulling your punches. Tell us what you REALLY think.

He couldn’t be more right. And far worse, it the exact same kind of crap that fortifies the autocrats and autocrat enablers. While I hate endorsing being uncivil, is it really wrong in the face of people TRULY trying to destroy the foundations of a democratic country?

nonequals2 wrote:

Real Obvi wrote:

Hey, come on, dude - don't be pulling your punches. Tell us what you REALLY think.

He couldn’t be more right. And far worse, it the exact same kind of crap that fortifies the autocrats and autocrat enablers. While I hate endorsing being uncivil, is it really wrong in the face of people TRULY trying to destroy the foundations of a democratic country?

Yeah, I know. Should have been obvious. Indeed, real obvi!

Why are you telling us about this instead of taking it to court?

Fat hurts wrote:

Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E7rJ2vJXIAEtzlX?format=jpg&name=small

The fear porn never ends with you clueless libs.

If you were going on a type plane that crashes every 1 of 1000 flights, would you take the trip?

That's what 99.9% survival rate means. And chances are very good that you will catch covid at some point, so if you don't take the vaccine you have already decided to get on the plane.

When Jeff Bezos went in to "space" it was calculated that his "spacecraft" had a 1 in 1000 chance of crashing so pretty much the same odds. An airplane has a 1 in 100,000,000 or up to 1 in 1 billion chance of crashing.

stephen santiagoog wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

If you were going on a type plane that crashes every 1 of 1000 flights, would you take the trip?

That's what 99.9% survival rate means. And chances are very good that you will catch covid at some point, so if you don't take the vaccine you have already decided to get on the plane.

When Jeff Bezos went in to "space" it was calculated that his "spacecraft" had a 1 in 1000 chance of crashing so pretty much the same odds. An airplane has a 1 in 100,000,000 or up to 1 in 1 billion chance of crashing.

Yes, but Jeff Bezos got to go into space. He got something in return for his risk.

What do you get in return for avoiding the shot? Is it worth a 1 in 1000 chance of death?

highest number of daily covid deaths in around 46 days in the US. 7 day average.

bloody heck

we need vaccine passports, stat. Keep the trumpists away from the good people.

stupid trumpers, trusting trump

you have to laugh.

a sucker is born every minute.

The unindicted co-conspirator to a felony fund raises, swearing he will spend the money to support insurrectionists...but he just keeps the money for himself.

O trumpers. You sad sacks of ignorance and foolishness.

A review of election filings from Make America Great Again PAC, Save America PAC, and the Save America Joint Fundraising Committee show that not a single penny was transferred or contributed from those Trump-affiliated entities to GOP candidates or committees involved in the midterm elections. Nor did Trump's various groups write a check to support the audit in Arizona that he has repeatedly praised in statements and suggested would lead to the overthrowing of the 2020 election results.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/08/03/trump-spending-millions-gop-candidates-502233

You poor saps. You fell for his lies *again*.