5k streamer wrote:
162430 wrote:Why aren't the Flo idiots talking about Michigan? I know their top 4 were 2, 18, 30, 46 and I think the 5th was decently close. They just keep blabbing about Oregon who went 4-14-21-6x-6x
Because they're idiots.
Michigan's 5th was in the 60s. Unofficially (and without removing indviduals), the top 3 are virtually tied. And no mention of Michigan. Pathetic.
Suspiciously, Clark for Colorado not showing up in scoring. Her getting added (assuming she finished) could be the key to the team race.
She was 3rd in the outdoor 5k at NCAA last year. Great run by the top 3 women. Gutsy
Here's her bio page at mutigers.com
Wow if Oregon won yeah I mean I know Oregon peaks it's runners for NCAA's but what was Oregon ranking like 11 in the Country on the Womens side? GO DUCKS BABY OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
cd16 wrote:
oregon has to have won, right?
3 in top 21, then 4 and 5 in low 60s
colorado had big pack in 40s
Anybody know what happened to Clark? I didn't see her in the early split results.
from USTFCCCA site
Karissa Schweizer, Missouri — If you’re reading this, you probably know about Schweizer already. If not, allow this to be a crash course. Schweizer is 4-1 this season with victories at the Commodore Classic, Chile Pepper Festival, SEC Championships and the Midwest Region Championships. Her only loss came at the Pre-National Invitational, where she finished 4th. Schweizer also showed her chops on the track with a 3rd-place finish in the outdoor 5000
Parent wrote:
I saw DII full team scores at the women's finish and at each split. On a laptop there were two columns- individuals on the left and team on the right.
Can someone post the link to DII please, not a photo but a link? Thanks
With chip timing shouldn't the team scores come through instantly? Disgraceful - just like the coverage. Flotrack you are rubbish.
clark 88th at 4k
anyone know anything about how Washington, Providence or NCstate finished?
To be fair, flotrack isn't in charge of the timing. I am anxious to find out who wins though... go ducks or go blue!
All the bitching about FloTrack and we've got no online results.
GutsIsEnough wrote:
clark 88th at 4k
Dang. That's killer.
GutsIsEnough wrote:
clark 88th at 4k
She must have been sick or injured.
They werent in charge of timing, however their video stream BLEW.
Man if only Flotrack spent as much time getting their live feed right as they do making high quality videodocs.
Honestly I really think they're capable of making awesome feeds if they really put the emphasis on it.
ruppian wrote:
Do they test the winner for PEDs at NCAA XC??
They do at NCAA indoors/outdoors; and Schweitzer is clean. This wasn't a shock. I picked both her and Finn in my ustfccca.org fantasy team. I knew the cold would be a factor and both are stronger runners and hardened by the winters growing up.
Washington did was Washington usually does....flopped in the big race. At 2 miles, they were 19, 58,and everyone else over 100.
Even after the break, they haven't figured out that Michigan is up there. They are probably going to win for goodness sake. I think they definitely beat Colorado. It is between Oregon and Michigan.