Californian - Post your real name & birthdate. Then tell us the exact dates of your "4:25" and "9:16" and where the races were run. THEN we might believe your BS.
I love it when you guys say that "if" this and "if" that and "if" this THEN (so and so) could run "4:30....using your reasoning, "if" I were 6'7" and "if" i played hoops year round for years and years THEN I'd be in the NBA. Sounds pretty stupid doesn't it?
For four years I witnessed Coach John Thompson put this Georgetown basketball players thru hell making them run upwards of 5 miles at a time several times per week to get "in shape" for the b'ball season. He made ALL of them run....including the 6' guards and the 7' centers. With the exception of MAYBE 3 or 4 players in those 4 years everyone one of those guys was sucking wind BIG TIME by the middle of the run. And these guys were shuffling thru the miles.
And each year at the bgeinning of outdoor track/end of b'ball season Thompson's guys would challenge the men's 4x100 and 4x400 team to a head to head relay race on the track. In four years the b'ball team won once (4x100). Some of the b'ball players were fast sprinters, but not a single one of them could have run anything close to a 4:30 mile. If you know anything about Thompson you know his players were "fit".
Granted running a 4:30 mile is not an earth shattering event, but it's not a easy as many would like to believe. Lactic acid has a way of making pussies out of even the "toughtest" and most "talented/gifted" athletes.
The woulda, coulds, shoulds arguments don't cut it.
If Hamilton can run a 4:30 mile he should prove it by running a mile on a track with witnesses and stopwatches. Anyone who says they "sprint" the entire mile is an idiot and obviously has no clue as to what they are talking about. The guys is full of BS and the RW person who interviewed him is a complete fool.
Runner's World continues to be a total joke by publishing that kind of interview in their magazine/web site. Nothing new there.