Oh, but you have wasted time already with your remedial explanations. But if you want to make more of your remedial explanations (too funny, you can't make this stuff up!), feel free….ttc wrote:
Tell Me wrote:Tell me why one should go over 26.2.
Reread my post. If you can't understand my point, whether you agree or not, then I won't waste time with remedial explanations.
coach 007 wrote:
Any mediocre ultra runner can easily run 30 slow miles and recover in a few days. If a marathoner cannot do the same he lacks one component of fitness.
Your logic seems flawed wo me.
Almost every sub-elite marathoner beats the §h!7 out of "elite" ultra guys at the marathon distance. So your argument is one for shorter long runs - as 90+% the faster guys tend to run shorter LRs than ultra guys ;-)
Pikachu