SMiLE wrote:
Lactate treshold isn't one pace, it differs from the distance you run. Stay at about 3.5 in mmol and its lactate threshold, you can stay at that lactate in far higher speeds if the run is shorter.
Not according to Jack Daniels.
And anyways, I said "I agree with you that tempo runs are best done by feel."
I never said it was one pace.[/quote]
Yea nevermind I read your post a bit quick.
90's racer wrote:
george oscar bluth wrote:Based on how Rupp looked in his last race I would say he will not threaten the AR with this type of race that is setup, and that 27:40 would not be a tempo run for him.
People are really not understanding that opener for Rupp. In the last 5 years how many times did Salazar say they were going for an AR? How many times did they fall way short?
By my recollection that would be 0. They did not say he was going for an AR here, but it is certainly implied that they are looking for sub 27:00. It would be a first if they fall way short.
I understand perfectly that it was an opener. Do you understand how perfect everything had to go for him to run 26:48? Did you forget his first assault on the indoor mile AR where he ran like 3:57?
george oscar bluth wrote:
90's racer wrote:People are really not understanding that opener for Rupp. In the last 5 years how many times did Salazar say they were going for an AR? How many times did they fall way short?
By my recollection that would be 0. They did not say he was going for an AR here, but it is certainly implied that they are looking for sub 27:00. It would be a first if they fall way short.
I understand perfectly that it was an opener. Do you understand how perfect everything had to go for him to run 26:48? Did you forget his first assault on the indoor mile AR where he ran like 3:57?
oops, I do vaguely recall that. was that an opener at washington?
Rupp has DNFd 50% of his Diamond League 5/10s in recent years, and DNSd the other 50%.
What will he do tomorrow?
george oscar bluth wrote:
90's racer wrote:People are really not understanding that opener for Rupp. In the last 5 years how many times did Salazar say they were going for an AR? How many times did they fall way short?
By my recollection that would be 0. They did not say he was going for an AR here, but it is certainly implied that they are looking for sub 27:00. It would be a first if they fall way short.
I understand perfectly that it was an opener. Do you understand how perfect everything had to go for him to run 26:48? Did you forget his first assault on the indoor mile AR where he ran like 3:57?
Are you talking about the one where Farah tripped? In 2012? That was just preparation for the 2 mile AR attempt.
There wasn't anything perfect about Rupp's 10k AR. The only thing he needed was a fast pace, which he got.
I totally agree. Tomorrow night looks to be nice and cool without much wind. The race is full of elite East African. Looks a lot like the 2011 Brussell's race to me. The comical thing was reading a news article today citing that only 3 runners have run sub 26:48 in the last 5 years. But two of those runners did it in that Brussel's race: Bekele and Rotich. Rupp of course just finished outside of 26:48 in that same race. It goes to show that a huge reason why so few go under 26:48 is that so few even try. Now they apparently are trying. Maybe that is obvious, but it seems like people are overlooking that simple fact.
TAA wrote:
george oscar bluth wrote:I understand perfectly that it was an opener. Do you understand how perfect everything had to go for him to run 26:48? Did you forget his first assault on the indoor mile AR where he ran like 3:57?
Are you talking about the one where Farah tripped? In 2012? That was just preparation for the 2 mile AR attempt.
There wasn't anything perfect about Rupp's 10k AR. The only thing he needed was a fast pace, which he got.
TAA wrote:
george oscar bluth wrote:I understand perfectly that it was an opener. Do you understand how perfect everything had to go for him to run 26:48? Did you forget his first assault on the indoor mile AR where he ran like 3:57?
Are you talking about the one where Farah tripped? In 2012? That was just preparation for the 2 mile AR attempt.
There wasn't anything perfect about Rupp's 10k AR. The only thing he needed was a fast pace, which he got.
No, that's not the race I'm talking about. That wasn't a record attempt.
90's racer wrote:
george oscar bluth wrote:I understand perfectly that it was an opener. Do you understand how perfect everything had to go for him to run 26:48? Did you forget his first assault on the indoor mile AR where he ran like 3:57?
oops, I do vaguely recall that. was that an opener at washington?
Correct. Don't get me wrong, I would love to see an AR, I would just bet against it unless I had very favorable odds.
george oscar bluth wrote:
TAA wrote:Are you talking about the one where Farah tripped? In 2012? That was just preparation for the 2 mile AR attempt.
There wasn't anything perfect about Rupp's 10k AR. The only thing he needed was a fast pace, which he got.
No, that's not the race I'm talking about. That wasn't a record attempt.
Which one was it then? I only remember one race where Rupp ever attempted the indoor mile AR, the 3:50.9