MAPIV wrote:
Listen, he makes sense 51 percent of the time. The other 49 percent of the time, he sounds like he's either got alzheimer's, he's drunk, or he's been eating poisonous wabbit.
ok, if you drop it to around 25% of the time making sense, and the other 75% sounding "like he's either got alzheimer's, he's drunk, or he's been eating poisonous wabbit", then I'll agree with you (and even then, I think I am being too kind).
MAPIV wrote:
NONE of these guys have run 3:28
moron
which part of 3'28 - 3'34 can't you understand ?!
Why not make it 3:26-3:34 since it doesn't have to be based on reality? Gosh are you stupid. You have NO credibility here, or on track and field news. You were banned because you can't treat others with respect, even those palpably smarter than you, such as myself.
ventolin^2,
Your fantasy league 7:26 is only a five seconds off the winner's time. Consider it a tactical moment and let's move on.
ventolin^2 wrote:
MAPIV wrote:NONE of these guys have run 3:28
moron
which part of 3'28 - 3'34 can't you understand ?!
The six seconds and lifetime of difference.
Sometimes you run the local 5k in 18:26, sometimes 18:31...nothing to get upset about ventolin.
ventolin^2 wrote:
epopians wrote:You list 8 guys who you say have 3:29/3:48 ability. Rubbish! Only 2 of these athletes have broken 3:32 for 1500m (Choge - who came 13th) and Songok (3:30.99). Only Mekonnen has run under 3:49 (just, at 3:48.95). Stop exaggerating!moron
i said 3'28 - 3'34
Umm, NO you didn't. You originally said:-
"these are nearly all run <<13/3'48/3'29 guys".
"Nearly ALL"!! If your definition of "nearly" is one of each, then yes.
Apart from Choge, who is erratic at the best of times, and pretty much at his limit running 3:29, only 1 other guy is currently a 3:32 1500m runner (Mekonnen).
When the 1500m record was 3:31/3:32, the 5000m record was around 13:00 and the 3000m was around 7:31/7:32. So history tells us, never mind your number machine, that a 7:31 is worth about a 3:31 or 13:00. As only Choge has run better than 3:31 and only 2 (Soi~ 12:55 & Komon~ 12:58) have beaten 13:00 this year, then 7:31 is precisely where these guys should be.
MAPIV wrote:Why not make it 3:26-3:34 since it doesn't have to be based on reality?
no
moron
i put in 3'28 as choge ran 800m/5k this year
i suggest you fetch me 1500/3k off
1'44.86 / 13'00'79
( try here
http://www.jundo.co.uk)
what's expected, boy ?
Gosh are you stupid. Choge had a bad race. It happens in real life, just not on your calculator. I'm sure your calculator expected Kiprop to have a world championship gold at 1500 this year. LEARN that there is more to racing than your calculator. I'm guessing Bekele does not consult your calculator before his races.
You're the kind of guy who would say that conditions were bad when Coghlan won wc gold in 13:28 or Geb in 27:57.
epopians wrote:Umm, NO you didn't. You originally said:-
"these are nearly all run <<13/3'48/3'29 guys".
"Nearly ALL"!! If your definition of "nearly" is one of each, then yes
no
idiot
8 in 1st category proves it
Apart from Choge, who is erratic at the best of times, and pretty much at his limit running 3:29, only 1 other guy is currently a 3:32 1500m runner (Mekonnen)
no
stoopid
choge ran 3'31.57 then pb last year in berlin
how come you didn't amaze us & tell us all that
"3'31 is his limit" then ???
you wouda made same stoopid limitation last year than now
choge now has run faster 1500 than coe, cram or ovett, but i doubt he even knows/cares
When the 1500m record was 3:31/3:32, the 5000m record was around 13:00 and the 3000m was around 7:31/7:32. So history tells us, never mind your number machine, that a 7:31 is worth about a 3:31 or 13:00. As only Choge has run better than 3:31 and only 2 (Soi~ 12:55 & Komon~ 12:58) have beaten 13:00 this year, then 7:31 is precisely where these guys should be.
you are a complete moron
it's obvious to any discerning viewer that the 3k+ wrs of 20+y ago were were piss-weak
7'32.1 of rono survived by an inexplicable miracle moorcroft & aouita
look at former
1'46.67 /13'00.41
try it for 3k ( & for 1500m with expected kicking from 500 - 600m for "perfect" race - like morceli in Nice )
then try former off
1'46.00 - 1'46.50 ( can have possibly expected that if run more than 1-off, with best pace judgement )
combine that with 12'55 if he'd got a wabbit in oslo
then try aouita with suggested
1'43.0 - 1'43.5 / 12'50 - 12'55 in '85
stop being an idiot & claiming 7'31s as anything special
what is wr ???
Lol!
You're a complete tool, and I can't be bothered to respond to irrelevant drivel.
MAPIV wrote:LEARN that there is more to racing than your calculator
moron
you need to know how fast you can run when contemplating your chances in a medal race
i assume you are the same backer of 3'35 crap entering sevilla who thought
"screw times, my boy wins it !!!"
Athletes learn how fast they can race by racing and some by training. They aren't going to find it out by looking at your calculator. Epopians is right, it is a waste of time arguing with somebody who'd be better served showing his little wabbit how he uses his abacus to prove his idiocy. Silly wabbit, twix are for ventolin.
Remember ventolin telling anyone who would listen that Kiprop was about to roll a 3:27??? ha ha ha ha ha. His pr is still 3:31, he BOMBED at WC's, and then disappeared. I guess he didn't check with ventolin's silly calculator. Maybe if he had, he would have won double gold!
epopians wrote:
Lol!
You're a complete tool, and I can't be bothered to respond to irrelevant drivel.
your loss
if you spent 1/30 hour "tightening up" aouita's suggested
1'43.0 - 1'43.50 ( off chasing down cram in 52.7 ) with increasingly quick 5ks of 13'00, 12'58, 12'56, 12'54, 12'52, 12'50, etc
( doesn't mean he couda run these - just potential - same as coe's potential off 46.0/1'41.5 was 3'26/3'27 )
you'd eventually find 400/1500/3k/10k figures that
"solve him"
Tom Bradycardia wrote:
Remember ventolin telling anyone who would listen that Kiprop was about to roll a 3:27??? ha ha ha ha ha. His pr is still 3:31, he BOMBED at WC's, and then disappeared. I guess he didn't check with ventolin's silly calculator. Maybe if he had, he would have won double gold!
ah well
i suppose my judgement of horseflesh is zero as i said rudy woud run 1'42.0 - 1'42.5 in rieti
http://www.trackandfieldnews.com/discussion/viewtopic.php?p=593463#593463Yeah, you predicted that AFTER Rudisha moments after Rudisha ran 1:43.52 to set a pb, and we all know Rieti is fast. It didn't take a genius to predict that. However, that post is part of the reason you are occasionally worth listening to. The problem is you don't realize that most of the time you aren't, and you treat others with disdain.
I ACTUALLY PICTURE YOU IN FRONT OF A MIRROR, TYPING MORON.
I'M GUESSING FROM THE INCREASING INCOHERENCY OF YOUR POSTS THAT EVERY TIME YOU TYPE MORON YOU HAVE ANOTHER DRINK.
MAPIV wrote:
Athletes learn how fast they can race by racing and some by training. They aren't going to find it out by looking at your calculator. Epopians is right, it is a waste of time arguing with somebody who'd be better served showing his little wabbit how he uses his abacus to prove his idiocy. Silly wabbit, twix are for ventolin.
just trying to decide if you are that retard canuck distance coach infesting t&f
possibly not, as he was complete retard, thinking his hero, ron clarke, was unassessable, when it took about 1'41.11 to work out, iirc,
54.0 - 54.5 / 1'54.0
ventolin^2 wrote:
just trying to decide if you are that retard canuck distance coach infesting t&f
possibly not, as he was complete retard, thinking his hero, ron clarke, was unassessable, when it took about 1'41.11 to work out, iirc,
54.0 - 54.5 / 1'54.0
You're rollin' now, venti! Raise that screen name to the 3rd power.
MAPIV wrote:
Yeah, you predicted that AFTER Rudisha moments after Rudisha ran 1:43.52 to set a pb, and we all know Rieti is fast. It didn't take a genius to predict that
moron
1'43.5 zurich to 1'42.01 in rieti ???
amaze us with your pre-rieti prediction idiot
YOU DID NOT PREDICT 1:42.01, you horse's ass. You predicted a range, speaking of range, when I thnk of ventolin, I think of homo, homo, on the range, where the wabbits and the whinoceruses play....