jonesy. wrote:
it's funny that flagpole thinks the non-bunny will take her clothes off only for him, when more than 50% of married women (and men) cheat on their spouse.
Well dude, there's still a chance. The more highly educated a person is, the less they cheat on their spouse too, so find a woman with graduate degrees or even multiple graduate degrees and you've upped your chance. With the Playboy bunnies, the ALL have shown their stuff to everyone.
more than 50%? that seems way too high. And its not as if it is RANDOM chance. If you have confidence in who you are as a person and a husband, I don't think you'll think its going to happen to you.
dfadfdsaf wrote:
more than 50%? that seems way too high. And its not as if it is RANDOM chance. If you have confidence in who you are as a person and a husband, I don't think you'll think its going to happen to you.
More than 50% of married people cheat...that's what that means. Doesn't mean I think IIIIII have a 50% chance of cheating. I've had way more than my share of opportunities and I've never done it. No cheating for me.
nyloco wrote:
The bunnies today just don't cut it for me, but the girl- next-door ones in the 80's (like Anne Pennington) would have made it a no brainer in my youth.
Annie is 58 years old now, and still gorgeous. I emailed your comment to her. Of course, I explained to her that 28 minutes is a very fast time, so it's not like you're choosing her over, say, a dinner for two at Red Lobster.
Wad wrote:
Take it from the Wad-man...that's me.
I married a girl who wasn't a playboy bunny, but she was a Penthouse girl (not a Pet, but a "regular"). She's hot, even at 35 now. Yes, she's had enhancements....but I'm ok with that.
She's a great mom, very involved, highly educated (masters in education), and a great money saver.
Sexually, she understands how to make a man melt. And she does that regularly, especially if she wants to buy something. And that's ok with me.
There has been no PNS at all - after 10 years! I have no complaints....hell, she's even forgiven me for some past daliances....again, not an issue for her.
Anyways, yes, some guys talk about us behind our backs, but usually they end up having to explain to there wives why they know that my wife was in Penthouse. LOL.
Not married to a Penthouse chick like Wad, but I have interviewed a local Hooters calendar girl, and she was exactly the opposite of what everyone has been saying about Bunnies.
She is intelligent, has two kids, works two jobs -- the Hooters gig is her weekend job to pick up extra cash -- and is a knockout. Oh yeah, she's gorgeous (for Seinfel fans: "They're real, and they're fabulous.)
I assume every Playboy Bunny is not a whore; not every stripper is a crack whore; not every Penthouse Pet came from the gutter. It should be noted I have no experience to back up the previous statements, just the thoughts that good-looking women are often happy to exploit guys to make big cash.
The wisdom of wanting to marry someone for just her looks aside, not to mention someone whose looks have inevitably conditioned her to carry a certain sense of privilege, consider this:
You'd always have your 28-minute 10k; nobody could ever take that, and the fact that you'd earned it,away from you.
How likely is it you could say the same about some trophy hottie?
She'd always be in demand, for all the reasons you guys want her, and trading on that fact would likely be nothing new to her.
Practical Analysis wrote:
Playing the odds of getting the other, when having one, I'll take the Playboy bunny wife.
If you have a 28 minute 10K, you have little chance of getting a Playboy bunny wife with that status. But, if you have a Playboy bunny wife, you have her every night and the rest of your life to train to improve your 10K.
Even more practically, given the recent marriages of America's 27 minute and change 10K runners, you have a much greater
But you have her your whole life... That sucks when you think about it. Her bitchy attitude day in and day out.. I'll take the 10k. 28 minutes and I'm not bad looking I would be able to pull down a pretty hot chick with that.
Practical Analysis wrote:
Playing the odds of getting the other, when having one, I'll take the Playboy bunny wife.
If you have a 28 minute 10K, you have little chance of getting a Playboy bunny wife with that status. But, if you have a Playboy bunny wife, you have her every night and the rest of your life to train to improve your 10K.
Even more practically, given the recent marriages of America's 27 minute and change 10K runners, you have a much greater
But you have her your whole life... That sucks when you think about it. Her bitchy attitude day in and day out.. I'll take the 10k. 28 minutes and I'm not bad looking I would be able to pull down a pretty hot chick with that.
Hetero gal wrote:
28:00 10K
Can you say WR??
Absolutely! Although to be fair to us, shouldn't we women be offered a choice of an equivalent male? Not that there would be too many who could compete with a 10k WR.... ;)
EPIC FAIL
1) it's Seinfeld
2) it's "they're real, and they're spectacular"
oh, and as for the issue at hand. I would definitely choose the 28:00 10k.
A fair update would be a
36:00 10k
-OR-
November/December playmate Ines Rau.
I'd give up my 29:13. I'd rather get chicked than be with a "chick."
Nobody cares about a 28 minute 10k outside of this site. A Playboy Bunny would probably cheat. So, I don't care for either.
I would like to be the type of person that could actually get a Playboy Bunny, but go after a more educated girl next door type.
take your pick... wrote:
discuss:
Can I chose neither? Someone who chose to be a playboy bunny would not be that attractive to me for a long term relationship. And As far as being sexually attracted to someone, no one is more sexy to you than the person you love (at least new love)
As far as running a 28 10k that might be ok but what if having speed like that caused me not to choose my current career path and I decided to be a professional runner?
I would easily pick the 28 minute 10k, as long as I am still allowed to find a nice, decently attractive women that I get along with.
28 min 10k without question. No need for discussion.
Could do without the VDs and the total wreck that most of them tend to be in life. That and the fact that millions have seen her naked and all the crazed stalkers out there. I don't really care about 10K running either. There are many other things I would prefer in life over those two things.
Cici wrote:
28 min 10k without question. No need for discussion.
+1
The bunny might have an STD.
28 10k...good chances you're fit enough to attract something more worthwhile than a barbie doll cut out..
comedyrelief wrote:
Could do without the VDs and the total wreck that most of them tend to be in life. That and the fact that millions have seen her naked and all the crazed stalkers out there. I don't really care about 10K running either. There are many other things I would prefer in life over those two things.
Agree.
I have pity, not attraction, for a woman who has been used and abused by many other men. Give me a woman who looks good naked but has not been seen naked by other men.