Injured: first sorry about your injury and the $95.00 question. Yes, it's a sizeable amount of money to lose, and I have often wondered why R.D.'s can't allow transfers, if done within a time limit. With computer technology today, shouldn't be a big deal. The race should be able to find a most willing replacement. If Boston had a April 10th cut-off for transfer, you could re-sell your number LEGALLY to a new runner for the $95.00 you paid, Boston could get a service fee/revenue boost, and the new owner of said number would be happy as hell. Win/win/win? (Only glitch for the BAA Marathon is the qualifying time issue, but still there should be a supply of those BQ folks.) I have suggested this to some race directors I know and the response has been something like:"we're considering it....", or "runners will still miss the transfer deadline, and be even more upset!" Obviously a large race can save THOUSANDS of dollars by a 15-20% No-show factor. (One race director told me that she routinely orders about 20% fewer shirts than sign-ups, saving her a few thou. She knows that 20% factor is pretty constant: why have a s---load of T's left over? Hey, we're not talking "food co-op" mentality here.Races have become a business and at some level, you can't blame them. Most runners are not aware of the huge expenses incurred by a typical road race today; still, a number transfer seems "do-able" and fair.
That being said, the BAA does NOT have a number transfer policy, and you probably should NOT sell your number on the "black market". Any financial recoup may well result in a severe sanction against you and the buyer. It's your call;$95.00 (at least) is a fair amount to lose. What I would do, going forward, is push for a reasonable number transfer policy at BAA and even at your local events. Start a grass-roots "backlash"! Good luck.
You have INADVERTENTLY created quite a stir with your thread. There his been more hostility generated on this thread than any other I have seen; more name-calling, personal attacks, etc. than one would ever imagine over a fairly simple question. Not your fault: BOSTON's always been one heated topic. I think that it may have something to do with the idea of exclusiveness: People don't like to feel excluded. Boston is the victim of its' own success. People HAVE to run it, whether qualified or not. Thanks for allowing me to give my $.02 worth; on to other threads!!