Silence Dogood wrote:
Flagpole Willy wrote:A great time in a half marathon is a better indicator how the runner will do in a marathon that a great time in a 10,000. FACT.Agreed, but only marginally better. as has been pointed out, the marathon is unique, and the half-marathon has a lot more in common with the 10,000 than it does the marathon. but you are correct that the longer distance is theoretically the better indicator, but not by enough to make a lot of difference IMHO.
Ok then. Like you said, you agree with me. That then makes you right.