If the president / secretary of state wants it, then it can be done.
That’s all it takes in your opinion?
In fact, it does. From Axios:
"Zoom out: The Immigration Nationality Act of 1952 gives the secretary of state the authority to revoke visas from foreigners deemed to be a threat —a point Rubio made as a senator eight days after Oct. 7."
If the guy you are defending 24/7 has been hit with upwards of 100 lawsuits in his first weeks in office” . It’s better to assume he is just lawless instead of assuming all judges are liberal activists ruling incorrectly from the bench.
If the guy you are defending 24/7 has been hit with upwards of 100 lawsuits in his first weeks in office” . It’s better to assume he is just lawless instead of assuming all judges are liberal activists ruling incorrectly from the bench.
You might even consider it common sense.
Yes, lawfare from blue states and Democrat special interest groups.
"except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger;"
If you are older than 11, this should be quite clear. The exception refers to cases arising in the army or navy or national guard while in active service in times of war or public danger. The "or" refers to the times of active service where court martial can be used. It basically allows for court martial during active deployment of troops. This is a weird hill to die on.
"Zoom out: The Immigration Nationality Act of 1952 gives the secretary of state the authority to revoke visas from foreigners deemed to be a threat —a point Rubio made as a senator eight days after Oct. 7."
“The reality is more complicated, legal scholars say. The provision the White House is using—Section 237 (a)(4)(C)—is rarely invoked, requires extensive judicial review and is intended for unusual cases when someone’s presence in the U.S. could cause diplomatic turmoil.”
Learn to read. The part between your bolded sections matters. The exception you are misunderstanding only applies to members of the land or naval forces or in the militia. Basically it allows court martial.
Now, the following part, which I bolded above, and below DOES apply:
"nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"
Due process applies to immigration cases - as much as you and the cult of stupid would like to pretend it doesn't.
Except we are not in a war. Only people in the cult of stupid believe that.
So, there was no legitimate reason to invoke a wartime act to deport supposed Tren de Aragua gang members without due process.
You are 200% wrong. Too dumb to know you're 200% wrong. And even if you got your whole family to help you, you would still be too dumb to make a coherent post.
The courts will disagree with you.
"Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That it shall be lawful for the President of the United States at any time during the continuance of this act, to order all such aliens as he shall judge dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States... to depart out of the territory of the United States"
You do realize that you're quoting the "An Act Concerning Aliens" that expired in 1800.
So, no, the courts will not disagree with me.
How can you post so much about something you know so little about?
"Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That it shall be lawful for the President of the United States at any time during the continuance of this act, to order all such aliens as he shall judge dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States... to depart out of the territory of the United States"
You do realize that you're quoting the "An Act Concerning Aliens" that expired in 1800.
So, no, the courts will not disagree with me.
How can you post so much about something you know so little about?
The act was used 3 times after 1800... so no the courts obviously don't agree with you.
When stupid people form an opinion and try to shoehorn everything into the opinion they chose emotionally before a single fact was known they end up looking as stupid as you look right now.
You do realize that you're quoting the "An Act Concerning Aliens" that expired in 1800.
So, no, the courts will not disagree with me.
How can you post so much about something you know so little about?
The act was used 3 times after 1800... so no the courts obviously don't agree with you.
When stupid people form an opinion and try to shoehorn everything into the opinion they chose emotionally before a single fact was known they end up looking as stupid as you look right now.
Not the act you quoted. Try again. I'll give you one more chance to correct yourself and admit you were wrong, before publicly embarrassing you.
“The reality is more complicated, legal scholars say. The provision the White House is using—Section 237 (a)(4)(C)—is rarely invoked, requires extensive judicial review and is intended for unusual cases when someone’s presence in the U.S. could cause diplomatic turmoil.”
Rubio can’t just deport Musk because he says so.
Musk is a citizen, so your dumb argument is invalid.
“The reality is more complicated, legal scholars say. The provision the White House is using—Section 237 (a)(4)(C)—is rarely invoked, requires extensive judicial review and is intended for unusual cases when someone’s presence in the U.S. could cause diplomatic turmoil.”
Rubio can’t just deport Musk because he says so.
Musk is a citizen, so your dumb argument is invalid.
And Rubio isn’t able to revoke visas by himself dummy.
The act was used 3 times after 1800... so no the courts obviously don't agree with you.
When stupid people form an opinion and try to shoehorn everything into the opinion they chose emotionally before a single fact was known they end up looking as stupid as you look right now.
Not the act you quoted. Try again. I'll give you one more chance to correct yourself and admit you were wrong, before publicly embarrassing you.
"Transcription of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 An Act Respecting Alien Enemies SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That whenever there shall be a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government, or any invasion or predatory incursion shall be perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States, by any foreign nation or government, and the President of the United States shall make public proclamation of the event, all natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation or government, being males of the age of fourteen years and upwards, who shall be within the United States, and not actually naturalized, shall be liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured and removed, as alien enemies."
The only way you could embarrass me is if you could prove we were related.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.