Is there any chance that Hocker just meant it in some sort of abstract way? Not everyone thinks of God as a magical, white-haired man with a white robe and a long beard who can do miracles like a big monotheistic Zeus. Maybe he just thinks of "God" as something powerful but less concrete?
What if "God" was just a word people used to describe all the wonderful and ineffable forces of the universe? Or the countless and powerful union of a billion unpredictable choices and forces in our lives? God, to some philosophers, is just the manifestation of all the laws of the universe - immutable as they are - in our lives, not a magic human on a golden throne in the clouds like Zeus (which is how kids think of God).
The downside of this version of God is that "he" isn't a person, so "he" is hard to relate to. And he doesn't make choices for or against us. The universe is set in motion and follows these unchanging laws of nature. That's God to some people.
God is just a lot easier to say than, "All the events of the last 20 years and the laws of physics and chemistry and psychology came together to carry me across the line."