It appears to be what you think. It shows how far she is behind the top 10 in the event. But that is a subtlety beyond you. Will she be in the top 10 if she is lapped by the leaders from E Africa, as is likely? Of course if she tries to lead, which has been her only demonstrated tactic, the question will be what happens when she blows up at that pace - will she finish?
You really are one of her most dedicated fans. Only TMADDAFSHNE (whatever) posts more about Valby. Thank you for keeping her threads on page 1.
The only one pricked is you, obtuseness. You’ve been wrong about her for two years now. It’s obvious you seethe and that she rattles around in your head, because you keep wallpapering Valby threads.
I'm not sure what I'm wrong about.
It makes sense. You have been wrong about so many things.
You really are one of her most dedicated fans. Only TMADDAFSHNE (whatever) posts more about Valby. Thank you for keeping her threads on page 1.
You have a strange definition of "fan".
I know you are illiterate, let me help you: Fan 1. : an enthusiastic devotee (as of a sport or a performing art) usually as a spectator.
You devote many hours of your twilight years to posting about Valby, Jakob, etc. You definitely are an enthusiastic devotee. Happy to educate you, as usual.
It makes sense. You have been wrong about so many things.
"Wrong" is anything you can't agree with or don't understand. That's quite a lot.
Nah. Wrong is your saying Baldwin would never be charged. Wrong is when you didn't know about Kenyan results and world records and kept spouting your ignorance. Wrong is when you claim only doping can justify athletes of today being faster than your childhood heroes. Wrong is your whole presence here.
The only one pricked is you, obtuseness. You’ve been wrong about her for two years now. It’s obvious you seethe and that she rattles around in your head, because you keep wallpapering Valby threads.
I'm not sure what I'm wrong about. I haven't discussed her results but been interested in her unusual training and her interesting progression.
As a chief example, In this thread you were wrong saying she always leads. You obviously don’t even watch her races, yet that doesn’t stop you from repeatedly sharing wrong information just to be, what you call, a ‘prick’.
I know you are illiterate, let me help you: Fan 1. : an enthusiastic devotee (as of a sport or a performing art) usually as a spectator.
You devote many hours of your twilight years to posting about Valby, Jakob, etc. You definitely are an enthusiastic devotee. Happy to educate you, as usual.
So someone who posts sceptically or critically on a subject - like a Trump thread or about doping in sports - is an "enthusiastic devotee"? An education didn't do much for you, did it?
I'm not sure what I'm wrong about. I haven't discussed her results but been interested in her unusual training and her interesting progression.
As a chief example, In this thread you were wrong saying she always leads. You obviously don’t even watch her races, yet that doesn’t stop you from repeatedly sharing wrong information just to be, what you call, a ‘prick’.
So when has she run recently where she hasn't assumed the lead?
As a chief example, In this thread you were wrong saying she always leads. You obviously don’t even watch her races, yet that doesn’t stop you from repeatedly sharing wrong information just to be, what you call, a ‘prick’.
So when has she run recently where she hasn't assumed the lead?
I know you are illiterate, let me help you: Fan 1. : an enthusiastic devotee (as of a sport or a performing art) usually as a spectator.
You devote many hours of your twilight years to posting about Valby, Jakob, etc. You definitely are an enthusiastic devotee. Happy to educate you, as usual.
So someone who posts sceptically or critically on a subject - like a Trump thread or about doping in sports - is an "enthusiastic devotee"? An education didn't do much for you, did it?
Still, an enthusiastic devotee. Whatever education you got wasn't worth what you paid for it.
Again, you are wrong. It's hilarious that you talk about other people's little bubbles when your little bubble is running pre-1980 and your life on Letsrun. Stop posting and I will stop addressing you. See? We will all be happy then. Oh wait, you won't, because you will have nothing to do in your empty life then!
Again, you are wrong. It's hilarious that you talk about other people's little bubbles when your little bubble is running pre-1980 and your life on Letsrun. Stop posting and I will stop addressing you. See? We will all be happy then. Oh wait, you won't, because you will have nothing to do in your empty life then!
So you just admit you can't stop posting because I do. What an obsession. There isn't another poster like you. Poor helpless little fellow.
You mean one race - and only one? But she was leading for part of that race.
No, he meant one recent example. There are more. But you obviously are ignorant.
No, there aren't. In her college races she always ran from the front and has tried to continue with that at national level. There's no "sit and kick" with Valby - because there's no kick.