nitpick wrote:
One way to tell that the 0.100 rule is total bogus and that people can react slightly faster (or at least certain sensors register them reacting faster) is that there seem to be a slew of people hitting 0.08-0.09 reaction times, but not 0.01-0.04. Clearly a lot of those 0.08-0.09s are true reactions. How about that British sprinter who tweeted he’s 4x been above 0.097 but below 0.100? You’re telling me he’s *so good* at timing the gun that he jumps and almost hits it to the hundredth before actually hearing it? When the gun can take 1-3 seconds or more from ‘set’ to fire? Absolutely no chance, 0.003 is one one-thousandth of 3 seconds. That man can react in 0.09 or perhaps better, I have no doubt about it, and Devon Allen can clearly do better than 0.100 too (or you’re telling me he can do 0.100 exactly, the 0.101 wasn’t a jump, and he timed his 0.099 jump just one one-thousandth of a second off - give me a break!!!)
Or if you think he can’t even do 0.10 but can do more like 0.13, then you’d have to say he *jumped within 0.001 of perfection* in back to back races. No chance!!!!!!!!!! That’s just his reaction time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!