Why does some weird slander from a questionable source warrant its own thread, from Rojo nonetheless?
It's not pretty but when a former World Championship team member who has a popular social media and youtube channel gets in a spat with one of the most prominent stars in our sport and then makes veiled drug accusations, it is newsworthy and worthy of discussion.
Take politics. If some ex politician with a youtube channel and twitter following, went off on a prominent current politician with some veiled allegations and tweets and then deleted them, people would discuss it.
As worthy as it is for you to claim the innocence of the dumb burrito eating excuse athlete instead of having an impartial discussion?
It's not pretty but when a former World Championship team member who has a popular social media and youtube channel gets in a spat with one of the most prominent stars in our sport and then makes veiled drug accusations, it is newsworthy and worthy of discussion.
Take politics. If some ex politician with a youtube channel and twitter following, went off on a prominent current politician with some veiled allegations and tweets and then deleted them, people would discuss it.
No its not. Its slander.
When a different athlete gets accused (and convicted) for doping you hire in a sports scientist to clear her name, when S.Carri have some slander that is barely readable thrown her way you make an own thread and just let them stand? Where is the 10 page interview where you ask a sport scientist "she is clean right??" over and over?
This is just slander, its like listening to a strung up dopehead screaming something. It has no substance (seriously, look at it) and should be way below you to bring more attention to.