Next he'll tell us that in some countries the age of consent is 14 so technically Matt Gaetz isn't a pedophile...
You guys can ignore the facts like nobody's business.
You seem very quiet about Palestinians and Israel since the election. It’s almost like you know that Trump will give BiBi his blessings to finish it off for some sweet West Bank Kushner condos.
A document prepared by federal investigators bolsters claims by women who say they were hired for sex by Matt Gaetz, President-elect Donald J. Trump’s choice for attorney general, who denies wrongdoing.
Never read any of it. Knows it all. Repeats himself every day.
You think anything in an indictment is automatically true.
Your TDS has destroyed your tiny brain.
No, I don't. I'm not a leftist either.
YOU, on the other hand, are a proven LIAR. We ALL know you are a LIAR from multiple other threads.
Point out to me, by paragraph number, which detailed and corroborated factual allegations in this Indictment are not true and give a brief explain how you know that.
This is what it's come to, pulling out all the stops to try and get a pedophile confirmed as the the chief law enforcement officer of the Unites States:
You said Bill Clinton (perhaps the greatest president of the 20th century) was a ped o because he was a friend of Epstein. Oprah too?
He was a good President but not the best. Far from it. The Republican Congress of that period deserves just as much(if not more) credit for the economy of that period. The economy was already growing when Clinton took office. The Clinton admin’s failure to regulate financial services markets led to the bad lending and scams that led to the 2007 banking crisis.
I’ll give him NAFTA and modernizing the military. And the Brady Bill.
Failed at health care reform. Punted on Social Security and Medicare. Raising taxes in 1993 didn’t lead to the boom of rhe 90’s. It was the Republican Congress tax cuts of 1997 that strengthened the economy which led to a balanced budget.
He also loses points for his character flaws and perjuring himself under oath.
Federal Inquiry Traced Payments From Gaetz to Women - The NY Times wrote:
Federal investigators established a trail of payments from Matt Gaetz, President-elect Donald J. Trump’s choice to be attorney general, to women including some who testified that Mr. Gaetz hired them for sex, according to a document obtained by The New York Times and a lawyer representing some of the women.
The document, assembled by investigators during a three-year sex-trafficking investigation into Mr. Gaetz, is a chart that shows a web of thousands of dollars in Venmo payments between Mr. Gaetz and a group of his friends, associates and women who had drug-fueled sex parties between 2017 and 2020, according to testimony that participants are said to have given to federal and congressional investigators.
At the parties, women, and a girl who was 17 at the time, were paid for sex, according to accounts of the participants’ testimony from people briefed on what they said.
Late breaking News ^^^.
This Administration off to a great start for setting new lows on so many fronts.
Federal Inquiry Traced Payments From Gaetz to Women - The NY Times wrote:
Federal investigators established a trail of payments from Matt Gaetz, President-elect Donald J. Trump’s choice to be attorney general, to women including some who testified that Mr. Gaetz hired them for sex, according to a document obtained by The New York Times and a lawyer representing some of the women.
The document, assembled by investigators during a three-year sex-trafficking investigation into Mr. Gaetz, is a chart that shows a web of thousands of dollars in Venmo payments between Mr. Gaetz and a group of his friends, associates and women who had drug-fueled sex parties between 2017 and 2020, according to testimony that participants are said to have given to federal and congressional investigators.
At the parties, women, and a girl who was 17 at the time, were paid for sex, according to accounts of the participants’ testimony from people briefed on what they said.
Late breaking News ^^^.
This Administration off to a great start for setting new lows on so many fronts.
You think anything in an indictment is automatically true.
Your TDS has destroyed your tiny brain.
No, I don't. I'm not a leftist either.
YOU, on the other hand, are a proven LIAR. We ALL know you are a LIAR from multiple other threads.
Point out to me, by paragraph number, which detailed and corroborated factual allegations in this Indictment are not true and give a brief explain how you know that.
Your creepy little pro-ped pals in this thread were ALL unable to accomplish that simple task. Maybe you'll fare better.
The issue in the classified documents case wasn't whether Trump possessed the documents it's whether he had a right to have them in the first place.
Biden had no right to possess any of the documents he had stolen and stored with a crack addict. Funny how the DoJ was perfectly fine with those felonies...
Trump, however, was president. Your boy Obama created the PITC (by executive decree) which says if the president accessed data, it is presumptively his. PITC creates a presumption that the president controls virtually all of the data he receives.
Of course the case was thrown out before any of this came to light because Jack Smith and the FBI are so hopelessly incompetent.
This is what it's come to, pulling out all the stops to try and get a pedophile confirmed as the the chief law enforcement officer of the Unites States:
The federal sex trafficking investigation that began under Attorney General Bill Barr during Donald Trump's first term focused on allegations that Gaetz and a onetime political ally paid underage girls and escorts or offered...
YOU, on the other hand, are a proven LIAR. We ALL know you are a LIAR from multiple other threads.
Point out to me, by paragraph number, which detailed and corroborated factual allegations in this Indictment are not true and give a brief explain how you know that.
Your creepy little pro-ped pals in this thread were ALL unable to accomplish that simple task. Maybe you'll fare better.
The issue in the classified documents case wasn't whether Trump possessed the documents it's whether he had a right to have them in the first place.
Biden had no right to possess any of the documents he had stolen and stored with a crack addict. Funny how the DoJ was perfectly fine with those felonies...
Trump, however, was president. Your boy Obama created the PITC (by executive decree) which says if the president accessed data, it is presumptively his. PITC creates a presumption that the president controls virtually all of the data he receives.
Of course the case was thrown out before any of this came to light because Jack Smith and the FBI are so hopelessly incompetent.
Nonsensical sentences, whatadboutyous, Obama, defenses Trump never even raised.
You're unable do this:
Point out to me, by paragraph number, which detailed and corroborated factual allegations in this Indictment linked below are not true and give a brief explain how you know that.
The issue in the classified documents case wasn't whether Trump possessed the documents it's whether he had a right to have them in the first place.
Biden had no right to possess any of the documents he had stolen and stored with a crack addict. Funny how the DoJ was perfectly fine with those felonies...
Trump, however, was president. Your boy Obama created the PITC (by executive decree) which says if the president accessed data, it is presumptively his. PITC creates a presumption that the president controls virtually all of the data he receives.
Of course the case was thrown out before any of this came to light because Jack Smith and the FBI are so hopelessly incompetent.
Nonsensical sentences, whatadboutyous, Obama, defenses Trump never even raised.
You're unable do this:
Point out to me, by paragraph number, which detailed and corroborated factual allegations in this Indictment linked below are not true and give a brief explain how you know that.
Go ahead. Do it. It's better than typing more horseh!t that you don't even believe yourself.
The issue in the classified documents case wasn't whether Trump possessed the documents it's whether he had a right to have them in the first place.
You're unable to comprehend anything.
The indictment is entirely predicated on the idea that Trump possessed the documents illegally. He did not.
Remember the entire point of the indictment was political not legal. It isn't whataboutism to point out that the man who ordered the prosecution is guilty of a more serious version of the crime he's accusing his opponent of.
