Yea, it is something to think about when having sex with Chad. People need to think pat their next orgasm. Thanks for playing.
Also, you are a very disingenuous nasty person. Ectopic pregnancy does not occur 1-2% of the time in the general population. It occurs about 1 in 30000 pregnancies. The 1-2 percent figure is with fertility treatments.
No matter the percentage of ectopic pregancies, my wife had an ectopic pregnancy many years ago. I can't recall how far along she was when it was discovered as ectopic but we knew she was pregnant for a time. She eventually was rushed by ambulance to the hospital to have the pregnancy aborted.
In some states, and by your idiocy this would be illegal and, apparently in Louisiana subject my wife to a murder charge based on legislature being introduced. Tt is absolutely life threatening to the mother.
This is what happens when the religious right are overly catered to by a political party.
We have 40 pages already on an issue that so divides people they have diametrically opposed views. Yet in the US one side of the argument (incidentally, mostly male) thinks it has the right to impose its values on the other (chiefly women). Where else is this familiar, I wonder?
Overturning roe v wade will end up being the death of the GOP. By actually making abortion a legit political issue, they can only lose support. Many pro-lifers are actually pro choice when it comes down to actually being legal- it’s just a morality thing for them. And there has to be an extremely large amount of non voters who will now vote to maintain the right. In swing state some GOPs will have to go pro choice to gain a majority, which will cause massive splintering in the party. The GOP made moral stance a fundamental part of their party, but now that it is no longer hypothetical I can’t see either that stance or the party lasting long. Roe v wade could be the end of our current two party political system.
I imagine for under30 90% would be pro choice- even if many still think that abortion is morally wrong. I mean it’s been legal for 50 years people are accustomed to this right. I can’t see how the GOP will be able to maintain any longevity unless there a massive conservative cultural shift.
I'm not sure why so many think this "right" is going away. The Supreme Court ruling, IF enacted, does not prohibit states from continuing to allow abortions. States will choose for themselves how to deal with abortion.
You are missing the point. If this becomes a state issue, I can only see it severely hurting the GOPs power and cohesion. This being a state decision will be biting off more than the GOP will be able to chew.
Abortion feels like a ‘right’ as it has been legal for 50 years. If the GOP maintains a stiff pro life stance when the ‘right’ is actually in jeopardy (and not just a moral stance), I can’t see how it will ultimately end well for them.
I'm not sure why so many think this "right" is going away. The Supreme Court ruling, IF enacted, does not prohibit states from continuing to allow abortions. States will choose for themselves how to deal with abortion.
You are missing the point. If this becomes a state issue, I can only see it severely hurting the GOPs power and cohesion. This being a state decision will be biting off more than the GOP will be able to chew.
Abortion feels like a ‘right’ as it has been legal for 50 years. If the GOP maintains a stiff pro life stance when the ‘right’ is actually in jeopardy (and not just a moral stance), I can’t see how it will ultimately end well for them.
Potentially however the abortion issue has always been a very strong issue emotionally for those on the right typically from an evangelical point of view while those who are pro choice are much less emotionally involved and thus they stay out of the fray.
It's possible that, from a national standpoint, if Roe is overturned that it could actually lessen the presence of Republicans at the polls or have them vote the other side of the ticket if their one issue is no longer one.
At the state level, you'd think that women would rise up en masse to vote out those in favor of making abortion illegal but there's nothing to suggest that this will happen.
We have 40 pages already on an issue that so divides people they have diametrically opposed views. Yet in the US one side of the argument (incidentally, mostly male) thinks it has the right to impose its values on the other (chiefly women). Where else is this familiar, I wonder?
We have 40 pages already on an issue that so divides people they have diametrically opposed views. Yet in the US one side of the argument (incidentally, mostly male) thinks it has the right to impose its values on the other (chiefly women). Where else is this familiar, I wonder?
The pro-life movement is predominantly women....
Depending on the particular survey 60-70% of woman support the right to abortion in all or most cases. This runs about 10% ahead of men. Fairly consistently 60% of the entire US population supports the right to terminate a pregnancy in most/all cases. These numbers only increase as you change the parameters to say termination in the first trimester.
You are missing the point. If this becomes a state issue, I can only see it severely hurting the GOPs power and cohesion. This being a state decision will be biting off more than the GOP will be able to chew.
Abortion feels like a ‘right’ as it has been legal for 50 years. If the GOP maintains a stiff pro life stance when the ‘right’ is actually in jeopardy (and not just a moral stance), I can’t see how it will ultimately end well for them.
Potentially however the abortion issue has always been a very strong issue emotionally for those on the right typically from an evangelical point of view while those who are pro choice are much less emotionally involved and thus they stay out of the fray.
It's possible that, from a national standpoint, if Roe is overturned that it could actually lessen the presence of Republicans at the polls or have them vote the other side of the ticket if their one issue is no longer one.
At the state level, you'd think that women would rise up en masse to vote out those in favor of making abortion illegal but there's nothing to suggest that this will happen.
I agree, and in my opinion the only reason that the pro choice have been much less emotionally involved is because it had been nationally guaranteed. Every person who hasn't been decisively pro-life in the past 50 years is pro-choice. If being pro-choice becomes an active opinion, it will force the GOP to change its stance or just dwindle in power.
I think after 50 years of legality we also falsely assume pro-life = anti pro-choice. I am 24 years old and went through catholic education that contained many pro-life vs pro-choice debates. These were always more of a individual moral argument, and I know that even a good amount of the aggressive pro-lifers would still believe in a right to choose once the right is ultimately gone, regardless of their own moral standing. I don't think my generation was able to actually conceptualize the real argument, being that it had been nationally legal for so long.
You are missing the point. If this becomes a state issue, I can only see it severely hurting the GOPs power and cohesion. This being a state decision will be biting off more than the GOP will be able to chew.
Abortion feels like a ‘right’ as it has been legal for 50 years. If the GOP maintains a stiff pro life stance when the ‘right’ is actually in jeopardy (and not just a moral stance), I can’t see how it will ultimately end well for them.
Potentially however the abortion issue has always been a very strong issue emotionally for those on the right typically from an evangelical point of view while those who are pro choice are much less emotionally involved and thus they stay out of the fray.
It's possible that, from a national standpoint, if Roe is overturned that it could actually lessen the presence of Republicans at the polls or have them vote the other side of the ticket if their one issue is no longer one.
At the state level, you'd think that women would rise up en masse to vote out those in favor of making abortion illegal but there's nothing to suggest that this will happen.
Woah, you are saying the left is not the party run by emotions? Did you miss the last 2+ years of riots and protests? Go to any campus where a conservative is speaking and you will see leftists in tears.
We have 40 pages already on an issue that so divides people they have diametrically opposed views. Yet in the US one side of the argument (incidentally, mostly male) thinks it has the right to impose its values on the other (chiefly women). Where else is this familiar, I wonder?
Potentially however the abortion issue has always been a very strong issue emotionally for those on the right typically from an evangelical point of view while those who are pro choice are much less emotionally involved and thus they stay out of the fray.
It's possible that, from a national standpoint, if Roe is overturned that it could actually lessen the presence of Republicans at the polls or have them vote the other side of the ticket if their one issue is no longer one.
At the state level, you'd think that women would rise up en masse to vote out those in favor of making abortion illegal but there's nothing to suggest that this will happen.
Woah, you are saying the left is not the party run by emotions? Did you miss the last 2+ years of riots and protests? Go to any campus where a conservative is speaking and you will see leftists in tears.
No you clueless wonder. I said that the abortion issue is an issue more emotionally ingrained in the evangelical right who oppose it and thus they will come to the polls to do their best to eliminate it. Those who are pro choice are not heading to the polls to ensure that issue works in their favor.
Potentially however the abortion issue has always been a very strong issue emotionally for those on the right typically from an evangelical point of view while those who are pro choice are much less emotionally involved and thus they stay out of the fray.
It's possible that, from a national standpoint, if Roe is overturned that it could actually lessen the presence of Republicans at the polls or have them vote the other side of the ticket if their one issue is no longer one.
At the state level, you'd think that women would rise up en masse to vote out those in favor of making abortion illegal but there's nothing to suggest that this will happen.
I agree, and in my opinion the only reason that the pro choice have been much less emotionally involved is because it had been nationally guaranteed. Every person who hasn't been decisively pro-life in the past 50 years is pro-choice. If being pro-choice becomes an active opinion, it will force the GOP to change its stance or just dwindle in power.
I think after 50 years of legality we also falsely assume pro-life = anti pro-choice. I am 24 years old and went through catholic education that contained many pro-life vs pro-choice debates. These were always more of a individual moral argument, and I know that even a good amount of the aggressive pro-lifers would still believe in a right to choose once the right is ultimately gone, regardless of their own moral standing. I don't think my generation was able to actually conceptualize the real argument, being that it had been nationally legal for so long.
Same here. Pro life doesn't equal making abortion illegal.
Depending on the particular survey 60-70% of woman support the right to abortion in all or most cases. This runs about 10% ahead of men. Fairly consistently 60% of the entire US population supports the right to terminate a pregnancy in most/all cases. These numbers only increase as you change the parameters to say termination in the first trimester.
That's simply not true...
Less than 50% support abortions of convenience which is 90+% of abortions.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.