Can’t stop talking about Trump, can you?
Democrats lose again!!!!
Can’t stop talking about Trump, can you?
Democrats lose again!!!!
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Look at the fraud in Fat hurts' state. specifically in Fulton county.
"at least 36 batches of mail-in ballots with 4,255 total extra votes were redundantly added into Fulton Co. audit results for the November election. These illicit votes include 3,390 extra votes for Joe Biden, 865 extra votes for Donald Trump and 43 extra votes for Jo Jorgenson."
"But it is not simply a case of errors. The VoterGA team found 7 falsified audit tally sheets containing fabricated vote totals for their respective batches."
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E6M-xMkXMAI4F9a?format=jpg&name=small"a batch containing 59 actual ballot images for Joe Biden, 42 for Donald Trump and 0 for Jo Jorgenson was reported as 100 for Biden and 0 for Trump."
No chain of custody for these ballots, either.
https://voterga.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Press-Release-New-Evidence-Reveals-Georgia-Audit-Fraud-and-Massive-Errors.pdf
Remind us, what did the judges have to say about this evidence in court last year?
kibitzer wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Trump was an underdog in 2016. He got lucky.
Trump was an even bigger underdog in 2020. He lost pretty badly, even losing Georgia.
Trump will be an even bigger underdog in 2024. He as almost no chance at all.
But for fewer than 43,000 votes in key states, DJT would have won in the Electoral College again.
ANY Republican presidential candidate has a very good chance of winning.
Yeah but Trump defies gravity when it comes to self owning. He would get destroyed by Biden in 2024, destroyed. He would have a good chance though against an unpopular candidate who did poorly in the nominee race. We have a problem with women and nonwhites in this country. Obama was an exceptional candidate.
Fat hurts wrote:
Ha mbo wrote:
So for this you say you need facts to believe. Why not just have faith? 😂😂😂😂😂
Because faith without reason is merely a superstition. I'm not superstitious like the Trumpers.
Yet you have faith with no reason every Sunday. 😂😂😂😂
How did that unfortunate talk with your pastor go? Hope he answered your questions. I’ll be glad to help you. 😂😂😂🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Ha mbo wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Because faith without reason is merely a superstition. I'm not superstitious like the Trumpers.
Yet you have faith with no reason every Sunday. 😂😂😂😂
How did that unfortunate talk with your pastor go? Hope he answered your questions. I’ll be glad to help you. 😂😂😂🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
You also have faith with no reason when it comes to EVs. 😂😂😂
https://www.torquenews.com/1083/charging-electric-vehicle-public-can-cost-triple-what-fueling-gas-guzzler-does/ampTzees despise the truth
https://twitter.com/meidastouch/status/1415109004947202049?s=21
But but but the cyber ninjas! 🎻
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1414585334885601283?s=21
kibitzer wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Trump was an underdog in 2016. He got lucky.
Trump was an even bigger underdog in 2020. He lost pretty badly, even losing Georgia.
Trump will be an even bigger underdog in 2024. He as almost no chance at all.
But for fewer than 43,000 votes in key states, DJT would have won in the Electoral College again.
ANY Republican presidential candidate has a very good chance of winning.
Actually, those 43,000 votes would have made it a tie in the EC. That's the combined total margin of victory in Georgia, Wisconsin, and Arizona. For Trump to get an outright victory, he needed to flip Nevada to the tune of 33,596 votes for a total of more than 76,000.
I said he lost badly based on total EC count. 306 to 232 is a pretty decisive victory. But your point is well taken.
It's true that any Republican candidate has a chance. But it has to be the right candidate. Trump is definitely not that candidate.
And as long as Republicans are the party of old white people, they will keep losing ground. Even their structural advantage in the Electoral College can't save them if they don't start appealing to the people who will still be alive in 2024.
Ha mbo wrote:
Ha mbo wrote:
Yet you have faith with no reason every Sunday. 😂😂😂😂
How did that unfortunate talk with your pastor go? Hope he answered your questions. I’ll be glad to help you. 😂😂😂🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
You also have faith with no reason when it comes to EVs. 😂😂😂
https://www.torquenews.com/1083/charging-electric-vehicle-public-can-cost-triple-what-fueling-gas-guzzler-does/amp
That was a weird charging situation that almost never happens. As the article says, you can often charge for free on public chargers. So he paid a little more that one time, but his entire trip was a lot less than he would have paid for gas.
On average, a gas-powered car will cost several times what you pay to power an EV. I saved about $2,000 buying electricity instead of gas in my first year of of EV ownership.
Fat hurts wrote:
Ha mbo wrote:
You also have faith with no reason when it comes to EVs. 😂😂😂
https://www.torquenews.com/1083/charging-electric-vehicle-public-can-cost-triple-what-fueling-gas-guzzler-does/ampThat was a weird charging situation that almost never happens. As the article says, you can often charge for free on public chargers. So he paid a little more that one time, but his entire trip was a lot less than he would have paid for gas.
On average, a gas-powered car will cost several times what you pay to power an EV. I saved about $2,000 buying electricity instead of gas in my first year of of EV ownership.
Public charging cost 3x what gas would have. $10 for 34 miles. No thanks. 👎👎👎👎👎🦤🦤🦤
What a clown show admin we have now.🤡🤡🤡🤡🦤🦤🦤
Ha mbo wrote:
Public charging cost 3x what gas would have. $10 for 34 miles. No thanks. 👎👎👎👎👎🦤🦤🦤
Public charging is often free. So he paid $10 for 34 miles but the rest of his trip was possibly $0.
The only reason he paid so much for those 34 miles is because he topped off his battery, which is something you should never do on a public DC charger. Charging slows down when the battery gets full so it gets expensive if you are in a state that forces you to pay by the minute instead of by the kWh.
If you buy a gas powered car you are an idiot. This is even more true today than the last time I said it. EV's and charging infrastructure keep getting better and better.
Here’s what moronic libs are calling Jim Crow in Texas. 🦤🦤🦤🦤
Are you guys really this stupid? You were proven wrong in Georgia and you’re proven wrong in TX. 🤡🤡🤡🤡
Chicken little, this does not conform to your existing personal bias so you are exempt from actually reading the provisions of the bill. You just keep your head in the sand and have faith. 🐥🐥🐥🐥🐥🙈🙈🙈🙈🙈
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/texas-election-bills-what-to-know
Fat hurts wrote:
Ha mbo wrote:
Public charging cost 3x what gas would have. $10 for 34 miles. No thanks. 👎👎👎👎👎🦤🦤🦤
Public charging is often free. So he paid $10 for 34 miles but the rest of his trip was possibly $0.
The only reason he paid so much for those 34 miles is because he topped off his battery, which is something you should never do on a public DC charger. Charging slows down when the battery gets full so it gets expensive if you are in a state that forces you to pay by the minute instead of by the kWh.
If you buy a gas powered car you are an idiot. This is even more true today than the last time I said it. EV's and charging infrastructure keep getting better and better.
You may want to pay $10 to drive 34 miles. Me? No thanks. That is ridiculous. And it takes a looooonnnng time just to get those 34 miles of charge. 👎👎👎👎👎
Way to go president Crises. You’re doing a heck of a job. 🤡🤡🤡🤡
President Crises is way over his head. 👎👎👎
https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/lumber-price-impact-housing-market
Ha mbo wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Public charging is often free. So he paid $10 for 34 miles but the rest of his trip was possibly $0.
The only reason he paid so much for those 34 miles is because he topped off his battery, which is something you should never do on a public DC charger. Charging slows down when the battery gets full so it gets expensive if you are in a state that forces you to pay by the minute instead of by the kWh.
If you buy a gas powered car you are an idiot. This is even more true today than the last time I said it. EV's and charging infrastructure keep getting better and better.
You may want to pay $10 to drive 34 miles. Me? No thanks. That is ridiculous. And it takes a looooonnnng time just to get those 34 miles of charge. 👎👎👎👎👎
You may want to pay $50.00 to fill up your tank. Me? No thanks. That is ridiculous. And it takes a looooonnnng time just to visit the smelly gas station every week.
I charge at home where it takes no time at all and the cost is dirt cheap.
Fat hurts wrote:
Ha mbo wrote:
You may want to pay $10 to drive 34 miles. Me? No thanks. That is ridiculous. And it takes a looooonnnng time just to get those 34 miles of charge. 👎👎👎👎👎
You may want to pay $50.00 to fill up your tank. Me? No thanks. That is ridiculous. And it takes a looooonnnng time just to visit the smelly gas station every week.
I charge at home where it takes no time at all and the cost is dirt cheap.
If I pay $50 to fill up my tank I know I’ll get more than 150 miles off that tank. 😂😂😂😂
Having to pay $10 to charge 34 miles and then waste 2 hours waiting on the charge is just silly. No thanks. 3x gas prices!!??!! 🦤🦤🦤
Ha mbo wrote:
Here’s what moronic libs are calling Jim Crow in Texas. 🦤🦤🦤🦤
I can't wait until that tzee Abbott arrests the Ds. His obsessive support for totalitarianism is going to flip TX for the Ds.
Fat hurts wrote:
nonequals wrote:
I have little doubt that the experts were and are right about fundamental demographic changes. But the "sky is falling...and soon" election implications of this appear to have been significantly overstated. And again, these dire predictions were being made when there were R national candidates who were certain WEREN'T the anti-Christ. I guess it's just another reminder that, as much as we enjoy -and hopefully learn from - "experts and pundits," they can be pretty far off on some things.
One thing about this is potentially interesting/depressing, though. My previous argument could probably be summed up as, "Geez, if Apocalypse Trump (apologies to AHS) could still win in freakin' 2024, how much longer would the "demographics" have to shift before a reasonable R candidate like Bush Sr. or McCain or Romney simply couldn't win? Would seem to be an awfully long time. UNLESS, the loss of reasonable voters can actually be outweighed by the gain in "excited" folks who come out JUST FOR a wanna-be autocrat ??? Is that what we've seen, at least to some extent? I suppose maybe. Silly me thought that America was (a lot) better than that. Clearly not.
Trump was an underdog in 2016. He got lucky.
Trump was an even bigger underdog in 2020. He lost pretty badly, even losing Georgia.
Trump will be an even bigger underdog in 2024. He as almost no chance at all.
Perhaps this is a "half empty/half full" argument. My take:
- 2016: People, many of whom really disliked Clinton (understandable to me), took a risk and hoped he'd "grow into it." Turned out tragic, but OK.
- 2020: It was WAY, WAY closer than it should have been after what people saw for those 4 years. 75 million Americans wanted 4 more years of that, (and actually, almost certainly worst).
- 2024: That it's even remotely a question says a HELL of a lot about America.
Someone was trying to argue with me about voter IDs yesterday. Last time I checked voting is a right, while flying on a plane or buying alcohol are not. Heck in some states you don't even need an ID to buy a gun. Voter fraud is extremely rare and no matter how many stones the GQP turn they never find anything (except a few fake trump votes), so there is no need to try to solve a problem that doesn't exist. But we all know which "problem" the GQP is trying to solve - how do they continue to win elections when their base keeps dwindling? In TX, it's pure voter suppression. While it disproportionately impacts nonwhites, the real target is just Ds. Limiting methods of casting ballots in heavy D counties and even closing DMV offices in predominantly D leaning areas (while telling you need an ID to vote!). And the timing of course is not suspect at all. Right after their hero gets destroyed and TX doesn't look so red anymore.... pure voter suppression.