pupil3142 wrote:
The prosecution seems to have entered a contradictory narrative yesterday.
everyone knows gf died because of dc knee on neck.
But why?
Now two theories entered by prosecution;
1) air choke - causes asphyxiation
2) blood choke - blood loss to brain.
1) is slow, 2) takes seconds. (says the mma 'expert').
So which one is it mr prosecution? by showing you dont know which it was - you introduce doubt. further more, if you say you cant discount either of the two, you also say you cant discount that he knelt gently on a part of his neck not involved in either 1 or 2 - surprisingly enough, the human neck is well protected for 1 or 2 (humans survive as a species).
And then the actual cause of death was neither - it was heart attack. whoops.
So now its a real balls up. If they cant prove the knee was the direct cause of death, but they show death was caused 'generally' by the restraint, then why arent the other two on the same stand for the same charges.
Always interesting to hear a Klan perspective.