A flavor of Tucker's fear mongering
A flavor of Tucker's fear mongering
But just believe him - he was just joking
The grift rolls on.
Trump is a rare master of the long con and the short con.
https://twitter.com/fahrenthold/status/1413111810928955392?s=21
Fat hurts wrote:
The GQP is the party of crazy old white people.
Hmm. Crazy, Old, and White.
Should I just start calling them COWs for short?
Trollminator wrote:
agip wrote:
rewrite 6/: The Russians win again because they have succeeded in convincing millions of GOP dopes that the NSA spies on conservatives, and now they have compromat on a media celebrity and possible future presidential nominee.
Needless to say, this is not the first time Tucker (and other popular clowns) get trolled and played by Russia, and easily.
He is admitting that he spoke to agents of a hostile anti-America country. He's just not a law and order guy... and more likely he's pushing the envelope by getting himself close to legal trouble just to stay fully invested in this convoluted deep state narrative of his.
As I understand it, an interview like that is usually set up by staffers and not by the interviewer. Wonder why Tucker was talking to the Russians personally.
Fat hurts wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Needless to say, this is not the first time Tucker (and other popular clowns) get trolled and played by Russia, and easily.
He is admitting that he spoke to agents of a hostile anti-America country. He's just not a law and order guy... and more likely he's pushing the envelope by getting himself close to legal trouble just to stay fully invested in this convoluted deep state narrative of his.
As I understand it, an interview like that is usually set up by staffers and not by the interviewer. Wonder why Tucker was talking to the Russians personally.
it's probably part of the russian kompromat program. Get the target on the phone and bait him into saying something embarrassing. I'd guess the russians insisted Tucker be on the call.
Fat hurts wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Needless to say, this is not the first time Tucker (and other popular clowns) get trolled and played by Russia, and easily.
He is admitting that he spoke to agents of a hostile anti-America country. He's just not a law and order guy... and more likely he's pushing the envelope by getting himself close to legal trouble just to stay fully invested in this convoluted deep state narrative of his.
As I understand it, an interview like that is usually set up by staffers and not by the interviewer. Wonder why Tucker was talking to the Russians personally.
His tired narrative suffers more if he can't continue to push the Hunter bs to new levels. He'll promise he's about to expose the whole deep state - it'll happen this time for sure! :)
agip wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
As I understand it, an interview like that is usually set up by staffers and not by the interviewer. Wonder why Tucker was talking to the Russians personally.
it's probably part of the russian kompromat program. Get the target on the phone and bait him into saying something embarrassing. I'd guess the russians insisted Tucker be on the call.
Tucker doesn't care because he knows his audience doesn't watch other news. He will mold the narrative into what works for him. Doesn't matter if he is a straight up traitor or got duped and baited into talking to foreign spies.
LOLz these morons probably breached a bunch of protocols in their mishandling of the ballots. But trust them!
https://twitter.com/secretaryhobbs/status/1410744579570110466?s=21
Fat hurts wrote:
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Great news out of GA except for the libs.
Federal Judge J. P. Boulee denies Dem attempt to block Georgia election reform law from taking effect.
Another way of putting it is this: Garland's DOJ suit is DOA. He has no chance in Federal Court. It's OVER! Biden has no shot of stealing GA ever again.
Enjoy your loss, libs.
Your lack of reading comprehension skills [is] on display once again. The judge only denied a decision because it is too close to Tuesday's runoff election. Nothing was determined for future elections. All future lawsuits will continue unimpeded.
Hey, come on, man, reading and thinking are hard! It was tough enough just to get through the clickbait headline and figure out how to post the link--do you expect him to actually *read* and *understand* articles before he posts them?
Fat hurts wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
The GQP is the party of crazy old white people.
Hmm. Crazy, Old, and White.
Should I just start calling them COWs for short?
Fat Huts I apologize for using this term but you are the biggest idiot ever for still believing in Global Warming. You Nutjob LIberals were screaming at us that the Earth was going to perish if we didn't act by 2016. It is 5 years later and nothing has happened. No glaciers have melted. NOTHING NOTHING NOTHING. YOU will still be saying this crap in 40 years. We don't believe you now and we won't believe you in 40 years. You are a clown saying that the Earth will perish soon. You have NO idea how the Earth changes. No clue whatsoever. Give it up.
Trollminator wrote:
agip wrote:
it's probably part of the russian kompromat program. Get the target on the phone and bait him into saying something embarrassing. I'd guess the russians insisted Tucker be on the call.
Tucker doesn't care because he knows his audience doesn't watch other news. He will mold the narrative into what works for him. Doesn't matter if he is a straight up traitor or got duped and baited into talking to foreign spies.
This, probably, unfortunately. Despite the fact that we all know it, it IS easy to forget that a good chunk of the badness of Trumpism is NOT seen by Trumpers on a regular basis. And don't get me wrong, they've ALL seen MORE than enough (and years ago) to have made his badness crystal clear. It's just not the daily fire hose of crap that it ought to be.
I honestly wish you were right. Why? Because there are not enough crazy old white people to win elections.
But the truth is darker than that. The truth is that there are a LOT of young, dumb as dirt white and hispanic people who reside within the R party.
Yes I'm lazy and yes I know there's Google, but does anyone know off the top of their head roughly what the Trumper age demographic looks like? It's easy to assume heavily later middle aged and older, but.....to what degree? Are there perhaps more in their 20s and 30s than we'd like to hope?
Fat hurts wrote:
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Great news out of GA except for the libs.
Federal Judge J. P. Boulee denies Dem attempt to block Georgia election reform law from taking effect.
Another way of putting it is this: Garland's DOJ suit is DOA. He has no chance in Federal Court. It's OVER! Biden has no shot of stealing GA ever again.
Enjoy your loss, libs.
https://news.yahoo.com/news/federal-judge-halts-effort-block-204500929.htmlYour lack of reading comprehension skills are on display once again. The judge only denied a decision because it is too close to Tuesday's runoff election. Nothing was determined for future elections. All future lawsuits will continue unimpeded.
Wrong again, chicken little. Once the special election is over, it will be almost impossible for the dems to show cause to block the law for 2022 since by then, it will have been in effect for at least one election.
There are, but in generally fair elections, they do not outnumber D voters. From my discussions with former trump voters (voted for Biden in 2020), it just became so extremely and cultish within their own circles that those displaying any shred of common sense and morals are quickly shunned... that is what led to the blowout 7m vote margin for Biden. The more they hunker down on crazy the more they alienate some of their own and push them to start seeing the light. That is a reason I have no problem ridiculing tzees. I prefer they keep their crazy and pro-autocratic support on full display so we draw hard lines and force people to choose. Moderates and liberals band together when the threat is strong against our foundation.
Somewhere between 2017 and 2019, and earlier, an observation like this would have contributed to my hope. The hope that the erosion of Trump support, while MUCH slower than one would hope, was steady and would gradually pile up to encouraging levels. But his pretty much rock-steady (if low) approval ratings (and sky high and steady R approval) constantly indicated otherwise. And still 75 million votes (or whatever) at the end of it all. And an electoral loss that was more than close enough for some really nervous hours and days for the sane people.
Oh, but THEN the R party dispensed with him? Uh.....nope.
Unfortunately, the "alienation" rate appears to be awfully low. And maybe now approaching zero?
Even if the Trumper demographic is overwhelmingly later middle-aged and older, the time between now and the necesssary expirations may be FAR too long for the country. Hell, as we all know, maybe just 18 months until KM is the Speaker.....
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Your lack of reading comprehension skills are on display once again. The judge only denied a decision because it is too close to Tuesday's runoff election. Nothing was determined for future elections. All future lawsuits will continue unimpeded.
Wrong again, chicken little. Once the special election is over, it will be almost impossible for the dems to show cause to block the law for 2022 since by then, it will have been in effect for at least one election.
You still don't understand what your own article said.
Also, your argument is one of your dumbest yet. There is no "in effect for at least one election" rule. For instance, poll taxes were used for many elections. That doesn't mean poll taxes became legal.
agip wrote:
The grift rolls on.
Trump is a rare master of the long con and the short con.
https://twitter.com/fahrenthold/status/1413111810928955392?s=21
What-a-agipanator, wrong thread. You can't defend Biden.
Fat hurts wrote:
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Wrong again, chicken little. Once the special election is over, it will be almost impossible for the dems to show cause to block the law for 2022 since by then, it will have been in effect for at least one election.
You still don't understand what your own article said.
Also, your argument is one of your dumbest yet. There is no "in effect for at least one election" rule. For instance, poll taxes were used for many elections. That doesn't mean poll taxes became legal.
Garland's lawsuit is dead, dummy. That is all you need to know. Enjoy your loss.
Fat hurts wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
The GQP is the party of crazy old white people.
Hmm. Crazy, Old, and White.
Should I just start calling them COWs for short?
Try defending your POTUS, dummy. You can't.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E5zKdizWUAMpEdw?format=jpg&name=smallNote: when gary writes 'try defending Biden. You can't' we see his trolldom in full flower. His trolling strategy.
he posts a sharp totally obnoxious meme and then challenges us to defend Biden. Betting that we can't. Then, like troll victims, we do defend Biden, but Gary don't care.
Well boys we don't have to take up his obvious trolling.