This thread was deleted by a volunteer moderator. I certainly don't want a thread this big deleted so I've restored. THat being said, this thread has served it's purpose. I've closed it to new posts.
We have a new 2024 vaccine thread here. New people don't need to try to wade through 20,000 posts to figure out what is going on.
Keep it up! You’re doing a great job looking downright stupid.
Perhaps you didn't see this, or perhaps you refused to believe it since it was on the gatewaypundit, but here it is from Australian media. Here's the Australian version of Fauci, Walensky, or Scarf Lady being "downright stupid," because she and her wife were both injured from the "vaccines."
Former member of the Australian Parliament and former President of the Australian Medical Association. She must be the most prominent medical/government person in the world to call attention to the very serious adverse effects of the Covid "vaccines".
This is only the beginning. In 2023, watch the vax mob mafia run like the rats they are.
Keep it up! You’re doing a great job looking downright stupid.
Perhaps you didn't see this, or perhaps you refused to believe it since it was on the gatewaypundit, but here it is from Australian media. Here's the Australian version of Fauci, Walensky, or Scarf Lady being "downright stupid," because she and her wife were both injured from the "vaccines."
If I had the numerical skills of most the anti-vaxxers I would look at this figure and conclude voting for Trump literally kills you - but I have better skills so I will just leave interpretation up to you all.
Merely doing my part to evaluate the evidence. I understand not everyone can keep up with the lit like I do, so you're welcome for providing important context.
Harambe-
Are you also 2600 bro?
You answered Covidicy’s reply to 2600 bro a couple pages back as if you were him.
Just asking.
No, Covidiocy was referring to my post earlier 'something is awry at CC'
Antivaxxers exposing themselves to a lifetime of embolism risk.
All because of some silly propaganda.
Why do you and Americans without ethics continue to pimp Rona vax to children?
Who else in the world does that?
What other nation empowered ego mad, attention starved epidemiologista to mask their children, still?
What's the "excess mortality" or excess illness rate for the 90+ % of kids whose families rejected your placebo -- at best -- shots?
We know your excess morality = ZERO
COVID puts kids in the hospital and (rarely) kills them. The vaccine is proven to prevent this with excellent efficacy. Reducing [small number] to [even smaller number] is great. That's what the chicken pox vaccine does, for example. On a few dozen people a year died of chicken pox before the vaccine was introduced.
If parents choose to accept the higher risk and avoid the vax, so be it.
Former federal MP Dr Kerryn Phelps has revealed she and her wife both suffered serious and ongoing injures from Covid vaccines, while suggesting the true rate of adverse events is far higher than acknowledged due to underreporting and “threats” from medical regulators.
In an explosive submission to Parliament’s Long Covid inquiry, the former Australian Medical Association (AMA) president has broken her silence about the “devastating” experience — emerging as the most prominent public health figure in the country to speak up about the taboo subject.
“This is an issue that I have witnessed first-hand with my wife who suffered a severe neurological reaction to her first Pfizer vaccine within minutes, including burning face and gums, paraesethesiae, and numb hands and feet, while under observation by myself, another doctor and a registered nurse at the time of immunisation,” the 65-year-old said.
“I continue to observe the devastating effects a year-and-a-half later with the addition of fatigue and additional neurological symptoms including nerve pains, altered sense of smell, visual disturbance and musculoskeletal inflammation. The diagnosis and causation has been confirmed by several specialists who have told me that they have seen ‘a lot’ of patients in a similar situation.”
You answered Covidicy’s reply to 2600 bro a couple pages back as if you were him.
Just asking.
No, Covidiocy was referring to my post earlier 'something is awry at CC'
He quoted 2600 bro’s post and you replied as if he was responding to you.
Now I don’t doubt that some of these anti-vaxxers are the same poster too, but this seems to be a case where you forgot to logout of your other handle before replying.
You should let your posts stand on their own and not use an alias to reaffirm your points.
No, Covidiocy was referring to my post earlier 'something is awry at CC'
He quoted 2600 bro’s post and you replied as if he was responding to you.
Now I don’t doubt that some of these anti-vaxxers are the same poster too, but this seems to be a case where you forgot to logout of your other handle before replying.
You should let your posts stand on their own and not use an alias to reaffirm your points.
Go back and look at the post. He makes a reference to my earlier post criticizing the authors for putting out many studies based on one dataset that conflicts with basically every other observational covid dataset out there. I responded to that.
Why do you and Americans without ethics continue to pimp Rona vax to children?
Who else in the world does that?
What other nation empowered ego mad, attention starved epidemiologista to mask their children, still?
What's the "excess mortality" or excess illness rate for the 90+ % of kids whose families rejected your placebo -- at best -- shots?
We know your excess morality = ZERO
COVID puts kids in the hospital and (rarely) kills them. The vaccine is proven to prevent this with excellent efficacy. Reducing [small number] to [even smaller number] is great. That's what the chicken pox vaccine does, for example. On a few dozen people a year died of chicken pox before the vaccine was introduced.
If parents choose to accept the higher risk and avoid the vax, so be it.
You lie, again. ZERO data supports * any * "efficacy" rona vax in kids 0-4 or 5-12... I'll stop there for now because they're most recent.
If there was any data and not just blind idiot "faith"... the #s for vax for little kids, boosters for older would not be in the SINGLE DIGITS.
Nearly everyone, across the demographic spectrum, has called B.S. on your fraud, which is sustained only by a self-important, click-bait driven media and the insipid political + anti-scientific cabal that refuses to admit 1) they were wrong and 2) they are even mor wrong now.
Shout to 'rona vax bullhorn Celine Gounder tho'-- chin up, babe, it's "tough" for all us. #NotMasking
He quoted 2600 bro’s post and you replied as if he was responding to you.
Now I don’t doubt that some of these anti-vaxxers are the same poster too, but this seems to be a case where you forgot to logout of your other handle before replying.
You should let your posts stand on their own and not use an alias to reaffirm your points.
Go back and look at the post. He makes a reference to my earlier post criticizing the authors for putting out many studies based on one dataset that conflicts with basically every other observational covid dataset out there. I responded to that.
I did. He didn’t. He was replying to 2600 bro’s post only.
Listen. You’re doing a good job here. Don’t screw up your credibility by using sock puppets in attempts to bolster your credibility. Let your posts stand on their own.
COVID puts kids in the hospital and (rarely) kills them. The vaccine is proven to prevent this with excellent efficacy. Reducing [small number] to [even smaller number] is great. That's what the chicken pox vaccine does, for example. On a few dozen people a year died of chicken pox before the vaccine was introduced.
If parents choose to accept the higher risk and avoid the vax, so be it.
You lie, again. ZERO data supports * any * "efficacy" rona vax in kids 0-4 or 5-12... I'll stop there for now because they're most recent.
If there was any data and not just blind idiot "faith"... the #s for vax for little kids, boosters for older would not be in the SINGLE DIGITS.
Nearly everyone, across the demographic spectrum, has called B.S. on your fraud, which is sustained only by a self-important, click-bait driven media and the insipid political + anti-scientific cabal that refuses to admit 1) they were wrong and 2) they are even mor wrong now.
Shout to 'rona vax bullhorn Celine Gounder tho'-- chin up, babe, it's "tough" for all us. #NotMasking
BNT162b2 vaccination reduced the risk of omicron-associated hospitalization by two thirds among children 5 to 11 years of age. Although two doses provided lower protection against omicron-associated hospitalization than against delta-associated hospitalization among adolescents 12 to 18 years of age, vaccination prevented critical illness caused by either variant.
Go back and look at the post. He makes a reference to my earlier post criticizing the authors for putting out many studies based on one dataset that conflicts with basically every other observational covid dataset out there. I responded to that.
I did. He didn’t. He was replying to 2600 bro’s post only.
Listen. You’re doing a good job here. Don’t screw up your credibility by using sock puppets in attempts to bolster your credibility. Let your posts stand on their own.
It's a New Year and it's time to consolidate some of the covid threads. We've deleted hundreds of them but it just makes more sense to be official about consolidation. So this thread is for anything related to the Covid vacci...
It's a New Year and it's time to consolidate some of the covid threads. We've deleted hundreds of them but it just makes more sense to be official about consolidation. So this thread is for anything related to the Covid vacci...
I did. He didn’t. He was replying to 2600 bro’s post only.
Listen. You’re doing a good job here. Don’t screw up your credibility by using sock puppets in attempts to bolster your credibility. Let your posts stand on their own.
As much as I would love to have the genius of 2600 bro, I can only stand in his shadow and help where I can.
You’re really tying yourself in knots trying to explain your way out of this. You made a mistake and forgot to log out of your other account. It happens. Just let your posts stand on their own without the sock puppets. You don’t need them. You’re doing good work here.
As much as I would love to have the genius of 2600 bro, I can only stand in his shadow and help where I can.
You’re really tying yourself in knots trying to explain your way out of this. You made a mistake and forgot to log out of your other account. It happens. Just let your posts stand on their own without the sock puppets. You don’t need them. You’re doing good work here.
I proved it over and over, the links are there. No need to get so upset.
Will the antivaxers ever reach the point of not needing to cut n paste anecdotal stories of adverse effects in individuals and graduate to larger samples to prove their point that vaccines are more dangerous and killing more people than the virus? There is a huge field that is available to make their case. Aren't we over 13 billions shots delivered?
Or will we be stuck with anecdotal gotchas forever?
