If you would have told me 12 months ago that Trumpers would be publicly debasing themselves to justify Matt Gaetz as a great choice for Americas Attorney general I would have suggested that you go into rehab and get yourself cleaned up and thinking straight.
-
102
-
Safe Spacer wrote:
KeeOhs wrote:
So you have read this then? You should have said so earlier.
I have read it. Have you?
Obviously, I have. Why the fvck would I be in here challenging MAG@s to read something if I hadn't already read it?
Now that you've read it, please elaborate on how it's "law fair," or false or bogus or sham or any other opinion you've expressed about it. Explain which of the enumerated paragraphs you think fall under any of those descriptors and at least a short explanation of why.
71 -
KeeOhs wrote:
Safe Spacer wrote:
I have read it. Have you?
Obviously, I have. Why the fvck would I be in here challenging MAG@s to read something if I hadn't already read it?
You don’t seem like much of a reader.
06 -
KeeOhs wrote:
Safe Spacer wrote:
I have read it. Have you?
Obviously, I have. Why the fvck would I be in here challenging MAG@s to read something if I hadn't already read it?
Now that you've read it, please elaborate on how it's "law fair," or false or bogus or sham or any other opinion you've expressed about it. Explain which of the enumerated paragraphs you think fall under any of those descriptors and at least a short explanation of why.
Didn’t you say you read it?
05 -
Has anyone advised Trump that people on TeeVee are not actually experts in their fields? And that if they were truly experts in their fields they would be busy working full time in their fields of expertise?
It’s almost like Trump wants to run the country like the Apprentice.
111 -
Safe Spacer wrote:
Harambe wrote:
The government can certainly choose what’s moral for its own positions. Not for independent citizens. That’s common sense. unless you’re ok with pedos in the government?
Gaetz is a private citizen.
He is being evaluated for a public opinion, so public official standards are relevant. Interesting that the man chose to resign rather than defend himself on the House floor with respect to the ethics report.
70 -
Safe Spacer wrote:
KeeOhs wrote:
Obviously, I have. Why the fvck would I be in here challenging MAG@s to read something if I hadn't already read it?
Now that you've read it, please elaborate on how it's "law fair," or false or bogus or sham or any other opinion you've expressed about it. Explain which of the enumerated paragraphs you think fall under any of those descriptors and at least a short explanation of why.
Didn’t you say you read it?
Obviously, I have read it. Why the fvck would I be in here challenging MAG@s to read something if I hadn't already read it?
Now that you've read it, please elaborate on how it's "law fair," or false or bogus or sham or any other opinion you've expressed about it. Explain which of the enumerated paragraphs you think fall under any of those descriptors and at least a short explanation of why.
40 -
KeeOhs wrote:
Safe Spacer wrote:
Didn’t you say you read it?
Obviously, I have read it. Why the fvck would I be in here challenging MAG@s to read something if I hadn't already read it?
Now that you've read it, please elaborate on how it's "law fair," or false or bogus or sham or any other opinion you've expressed about it. Explain which of the enumerated paragraphs you think fall under any of those descriptors and at least a short explanation of why.
I thought you said you read it.
13 -
SeattleSilver wrote:
Safe Spacer wrote:
Gaetz is a private citizen.
He is being evaluated for a public opinion, so public official standards are relevant.
Could you cite the public official standards?
Also, public opinion of him is irrelevant in regards to his confirmation process. The public won’t vote.
04 -
Safe Spacer wrote:
I’m against government deciding what is moral or immoral. How about you?
Tell us you want to legalize pedophilia without tell us you want to legalize pedophilia.
You absolute creep.
60 -
01
-
Pest wrote:
Safe Spacer wrote:
I’m against government deciding what is moral or immoral. How about you?
Tell us you want to legalize pedophilia without tell us you want to legalize pedophilia.
You absolute creep.
Nope. Not even close.
Again, if he committed pedophilia like you libs allege he has, you have a duty to take your information to law enforcement. If you don’t, you’re part of the problem.
13 -
Safe Spacer wrote:
Pest wrote:
Tell us you want to legalize pedophilia without tell us you want to legalize pedophilia.
You absolute creep.
Nope. Not even close.
Again, if he committed pedophilia like you libs allege he has, you have a duty to take your information to law enforcement. If you don’t, you’re part of the problem.
Correct. They are the problem. The People have spoken. The days of making up sex stories without evidence to influence votes is over. The Sun has risen.
04 -
Safe Spacer wrote:
SeattleSilver wrote:
I have no knowledge about what total evidence the DoJ looked at in their investigation, how they evaluated it or why they concluded not to indict despite that evidence that they did have. And I have responded with the same statement previously in this thread. But when you don't like an answer, you just pretend it wasn't provided.
I’m all for throwing him in prison if he committed crimes. However, if he did all the things that libs on this thread allege he did, don't you think you fellas should do the right thing contact the authorities with your evidence?
One doesn't need to be convicted of a crime in order to be deemed not worthy of being confirmed for appointment to such an important position as AG. This guy is an absolute freaking mess of a dirt bag.
30 -
Safe Spacer wrote:
Pest wrote:
Tell us you want to legalize pedophilia without tell us you want to legalize pedophilia.
You absolute creep.
Nope. Not even close.
Why did Matt Gaetz Venmo minors or have them at parties?
Also used his ‘adopted son’ Nestor’s Venmo to send them money.
Also used Nestor’s phone to contact these children.
Also flew them to NYC to show them Fox News.
Hmmmmmmm…..this isn’t normal, you are part of the problem.
40 -
Safe Spacer wrote:
KeeOhs wrote:
Obviously, I have read it. Why the fvck would I be in here challenging MAG@s to read something if I hadn't already read it?
Now that you've read it, please elaborate on how it's "law fair," or false or bogus or sham or any other opinion you've expressed about it. Explain which of the enumerated paragraphs you think fall under any of those descriptors and at least a short explanation of why.
I thought you said you read it.
What a little fairy you are.
30 -
KeeOhs wrote:
Safe Spacer wrote:
I thought you said you read it.
What a little fairy you are.
He’s a precious little pervert protector.
20 -
Pest wrote:
Safe Spacer wrote:
Nope. Not even close.
Why did Matt Gaetz Venmo minors or have them at parties?
Also used his ‘adopted son’ Nestor’s Venmo to send them money.
Also used Nestor’s phone to contact these children.
Also flew them to NYC to show them Fox News.
Hmmmmmmm…..this isn’t normal, you are part of the problem.
Don’t know. It may not be normal, but is it illegal or immoral (as Harambe says)?
Have you given this info to the authorities?
02 -
KeeOhs wrote:
Safe Spacer wrote:
I thought you said you read it.
What a little fairy you are.
Ok?
01
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.