Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Many people fall riding bikes. Not Trump however because your guy wouldn't be able to find one big enough to support his fat butt.
-
34
-
One of the most ardent Trump supporters I know watched the last hearing with me and then shocked me the next day when he said, “Well, I think Trump is done.” Anecdotal, but momentous in my world. I said Trump denies all of it. He said he knew that, but believed her.
33 -
Surprise! wrote:
I'm a far left liberal and I am pretty sure the 2020 election was stolen for statistical reasons I have posted several time
29 -
carmine9 wrote:
Surprise! wrote:
I'm a far left liberal and I am pretty sure the 2020 election was stolen for statistical reasons I have posted several time
I am a life time republican, with a PhD in statistics and a job as a statistician, and I can say with certainty that the election was not stolen. I also believe the probability, on a probability line, of your being a far left liberal is less than unlikely, approaching impossible. If you had instead declared yourself, relying on the historic definition, of having the IQ of an imbecile, I would have said the probability of that, on a probability line, was approaching certain.
113 -
statatician wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
I'm a far left liberal and I am pretty sure the 2020 election was stolen for statistical reasons I have posted several time
I am a life time republican, with a PhD in statistics and a job as a statistician, and I can say with certainty that the election was not stolen. I also believe the probability, on a probability line, of your being a far left liberal is less than unlikely, approaching impossible. If you had instead declared yourself, relying on the historic definition, of having the IQ of an imbecile, I would have said the probability of that, on a probability line, was approaching certain.
You have a PhD in Statistics but can't spell statistician?
22 -
statatician wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
I'm a far left liberal and I am pretty sure the 2020 election was stolen for statistical reasons I have posted several time
I am a life time republican, with a PhD in statistics and a job as a statistician, and I can say with certainty that the election was not stolen. I also believe the probability, on a probability line, of your being a far left liberal is less than unlikely, approaching impossible. If you had instead declared yourself, relying on the historic definition, of having the IQ of an imbecile, I would have said the probability of that, on a probability line, was approaching certain.
Nearly 100% it was stolen based on the vote totals at the close of election day for PA, WI, and MI where Trump had solid leads with most of the votes counted.
Over the next few days the "late" votes were counted and in each case Biden got more than 80% of those. After getting well less than 50% of the earlier votes
A pattern not followed in the congressional, gubernatorial, etc. races in those states. Which puts the lie to the cover story that Trump told his supporters not to use mail in voting and the late counted votes were mail ins. Were that true, the same pattern would have held in the other races in those states (Dems getting over 80% of late counted votes), which did not happen.
99.99% the election was stolen.
310 -
Here they are in September setting up the narrative to cover the theft planned for those three states.
13 -
joedlirt wrote:
statatician wrote:
I am a life time republican, with a PhD in statistics and a job as a statistician, and I can say with certainty that the election was not stolen. I also believe the probability, on a probability line, of your being a far left liberal is less than unlikely, approaching impossible. If you had instead declared yourself, relying on the historic definition, of having the IQ of an imbecile, I would have said the probability of that, on a probability line, was approaching certain.
You have a PhD in Statistics but can't spell statistician?
Everyone knows that proofs in higher math are constructed by calling other people imbeciles.
Don't you remember that from college?
13 -
A 23 year old intern is being asked for advice? All the LR libiots and Trump haters certainly are buying this BS.
24 -
Wise Old Man wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
She was not witness to the thing she was testifying on.
The crowd was not armed.
Who decided Trump could not go on the march? I thought he was in charge.
Biggest bunch of BS since Russiagate
She heard the agents tell Trump the crowd was armed and could not pass through security, and he didn’t care. She was in the tent behind the stage when this was discussed. But you know what, I’m with you. Let’s have special agent in charge Engel testify in public. I guess neither of us know 100% what he will say. I just want to have you agree that what he says is likely to be factual and accurate. You good with Engel telling us what went down?
A little doubt cast on Ornato:
22 -
Wise Old Man wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
She was not witness to the thing she was testifying on.
The crowd was not armed.
Who decided Trump could not go on the march? I thought he was in charge.
Biggest bunch of BS since Russiagate
She heard the agents tell Trump the crowd was armed and could not pass through security, and he didn’t care. She was in the tent behind the stage when this was discussed. But you know what, I’m with you. Let’s have special agent in charge Engel testify in public. I guess neither of us know 100% what he will say. I just want to have you agree that what he says is likely to be factual and accurate. You good with Engel telling us what went down?
A little more:
12 -
Ronald Dump wrote:
A little more:
Ornato is a Trump flunky now. He has zero credibility. I’m open to hearing what Engel has to say on what transpired on Jan 6th. I’m fairly sure it will still be devastating for Trump. I want to hear from all the Jan 6 committee and Hutchinson haters and doubters if they will accept the testimony of Engel under oath on these matters as factual and accurate? He’s a universally respected federal officer with decades of experience. Are they prepared to accept his testimony as dispositive as to what went down? I am.
21 -
These hearings are very simple to understand. They are really taking it slow and spelling it all out very clearly. If you watch them you walk away with a full understanding of what they were trying to show and prove. A child can put it together.
The right wingers on this board and in right wing media are doing the opposite. They are making straw man claims with no basis in reality. It becomes very clear that they have not watched the hearings but are on their computers looking for right wing help to distort, distract and lie.
101 -
Wise Old Man wrote:
Ronald Dump wrote:
A little more:
Ornato is a Trump flunky now. He has zero credibility. I’m open to hearing what Engel has to say on what transpired on Jan 6th. I’m fairly sure it will still be devastating for Trump. I want to hear from all the Jan 6 committee and Hutchinson haters and doubters if they will accept the testimony of Engel under oath on these matters as factual and accurate? He’s a universally respected federal officer with decades of experience. Are they prepared to accept his testimony as dispositive as to what went down? I am.
The final two comments Cheney made about the witness tampering may have even come from Engel. She clearly was setting up the next round.
31 -
She has a history of lying:
24 -
Well this would be interesting. He knows a bucket ton. But he might just refuse or declare executive privilege or lawyer privilege.
FLASH: House Jan 6 Select Committee subpoenas former White House counsel Pat Cipollone
This morning, Rep Liz Cheney tweeted it was time for Cipollone to testify “on the record”22 -
agip wrote:
Well this would be interesting. He knows a bucket ton. But he might just refuse or declare executive privilege or lawyer privilege.
FLASH: House Jan 6 Select Committee subpoenas former White House counsel Pat Cipollone
This morning, Rep Liz Cheney tweeted it was time for Cipollone to testify “on the record”Cheney's political career is just about OVER.
33
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.