ok, rewound a bit. defence is absolutely taking the pee out of donald williams.
Lots of discussions led by defence of air vs blood hold. DW made a mess of that. one side, two side, trachea protected etc etc.
Did you train police? no.
How long a blood hold for unconscious? 3 seconds.
Can someone fight back again after being unconscious? yes
my energy pulled me towards that corner.
I had no idea an ambulance was called urgently.
i had no idea that poilce had been dealing with him for 15 minutes before you arrived.
you testified that after the ambulance came you saw two new officers. if they were new, how could you hear there conversation?
you grew angrier and more upset? you said; i really wanted to beat the shoe out of the police officers? i wasnt angry, i needed to be controlled.
you started to call them names? yes
you called him a bim 13 times? yes.
you called him a f====g p==sy a--ed b==ch? is that what you heard?
You said you would beat the ,,, out of him? you grew more angry and belligerent? no i grew more professional.
The main one, to me, is that air vs blood constriction could have been an important one, but by his own testimony it can be discounted.
He didnt come across as an independent witness, but a biased one. Was he wearing a blm tee shirt under his shirt?
a loss for the prosecution.