Nobody cares. ou won’t say your total account % return YTD You won’t say your total account % return YTD because it’s probably negative lol. Dumb slow dork.
Pray the judge goes light on your continued substance abuse arrests.
Ok, and what about addressing what he asked: your YTD total return?
Fortunately I don’t spend my day inebriated trolling people on social media. You become a bigger loser by the hour.
You really are an evasive, cherry-picking downbeat aren't you?!
He asked about the present year, and you cherry-pick some individual positions instead of addressing the larger portfolio, as he asked.
Then when asked a second time, you evade by bringing up a different year,
Why would anyone take you seriously?
You plague the thread with multiple posts every day saying the markets will tank, and you everyone with half a brain here knows you must be losing your shirt. Or more specifically, anyone that listened to your market analysis would be losing their shirt.
That is the point: you go on ad nauseum about a market direction and investing to avoid it, and when asked how an overall investing trading strategy based on that belief has fared, you won't answer.
That is as succinctly as I can put it, and how about just put up or shut-up?
Or, as it appears to me, you're just another self-serving short-trader out to foment unease so your short positioning prospers.
JPMorgan’s top chartist says the $SPX to tumble all the way back to 3,500, retesting bear lows 😂😂😂
Mike Wilson? LOL. Who would ever listen to this clown. He predicted a year-end 3,000 S & P (the same as you, Igy!) back in January. Please don't tell us you get your investing advice from this guy.
But that isn't really the whole story, in that it was generally a downturn followed by a commensurate rebound, at least as evidenced by major indices.
A better indicator of different investing strategies would be something a little longer, say a five-year period. I would be happy to crunch and disclose my numbers if others were interested in comparing....
But that isn't really the whole story, in that it was generally a downturn followed by a commensurate rebound, at least as evidenced by major indices.
A better indicator of different investing strategies would be something a little longer, say a five-year period. I would be happy to crunch and disclose my numbers if others were interested in comparing....
Knowing your investment strategy, I am confident you were much higher than I over that period, and most here, except of course Flagpole.
But that isn't really the whole story, in that it was generally a downturn followed by a commensurate rebound, at least as evidenced by major indices.
A better indicator of different investing strategies would be something a little longer, say a five-year period. I would be happy to crunch and disclose my numbers if others were interested in comparing....
Knowing your investment strategy, I am confident you were much higher than I over that period, and most here, except of course Flagpole.
If we had an investing Mount Rushmore, I would suggest the following: Warren Buffet, Peter Lynch, John Bogle or Benjamin Graham, and, of course, Flagpole. Never any doubt on that last one.
But that isn't really the whole story, in that it was generally a downturn followed by a commensurate rebound, at least as evidenced by major indices.
A better indicator of different investing strategies would be something a little longer, say a five-year period. I would be happy to crunch and disclose my numbers if others were interested in comparing....
Knowing your investment strategy, I am confident you were much higher than I over that period, and most here, except of course Flagpole.
I can envision Flagpole, in about 20 years, sitting down with his beloved grandkids, and proudly telling them how he has now beat the market 53 of 54 years.
Weak. Up 18% over same 23 months. Mostly passive while you’re working. Womp womp.
Good for you. I am a 73 year old retiree.
Maybe if you were a better investor, you wouldn’t have had to work until you were 70. And maybe you would have been able to pay off your mortgage and car loan before you retired. Seems to me that you got some bad financial planning advice. Oh, wait…
Maybe if you were a better investor, you wouldn’t have had to work until you were 70. And maybe you would have been able to pay off your mortgage and car loan before you retired. Seems to me that you got some bad financial planning advice. Oh, wait…
Oh wait, I actually worked interesting jobs my entire life, and my central life’s focus was never retirement. And the money borrowed at 2.875% is paid off, and the assets more than doubled in value.
Maybe if you were a better investor, you wouldn’t have had to work until you were 70. And maybe you would have been able to pay off your mortgage and car loan before you retired. Seems to me that you got some bad financial planning advice. Oh, wait…
Maybe if you were a better investor, you wouldn’t have had to work until you were 70. And maybe you would have been able to pay off your mortgage and car loan before you retired. Seems to me that you got some bad financial planning advice. Oh, wait…
Oh wait, I actually worked interesting jobs my entire life, and my central life’s focus was never retirement. And the money borrowed at 2.875% is paid off, and the assets more than doubled in value.
Igy, plus you have that wonderful 2003 Acura TL! Same as mine.
