You have said Mueller is coming/came and the clown is done about 10,000 times. You have been wrong 10,000 times and this will be number 10,001. Not a good track record, Flagpole. Hope the missus is doing well.
INCORRECT!
Mueller came.
The clown is done.
Remember when you wrote this 10 months ago?:
Sally Vix wrote: "Trump was impeached twice and was found not-guilty twice. He was vindicated. He has been indicted twice and will be found not guilty again. Perhaps call him the Teflon Don but no charges ever stick with him. Maybe because he never did anything wrong? Remember Richard Jewell? People were positive that he was guilty. What happened - oh, he was ultimately cleared of all charges. So too will Donald Trump. You don't have to like Donald Trump but respect the law. He is innocent until he is found guilty."
Shove that prediction up your ass. I was right (I mean, of course I was). You were wrong.
Remember when Richard Jewell was found guilty in the court of public opinion? He was ultimately vindicated. The same will happen with the Trump convictions as this decision is reversed on appeal.
It's not in the least bit "childish" to be happy ("pleased"?) that a criminal has officially been found to be a criminal.
I said it was childish to gloat, not to be pleased. And, if you are pleased, and you feel you need to tell the world about it...please ask yourself why?
In the words of that famous DJ Casey Kasum, talking about the Irish rock band U2, "These guys are from England, and who gives a s**t!"
On a less comic note, I'm old enough to remember Iowa voting down a referendum on same sex marriage and seeing posts on a message board expressing solemn joy at crying lesbians. If you really get off on other people's tears, then you have much bigger problems than a candidate you don't like winning re-election, conviction or no.
Gonna disagree with you here. The Trump tears aren't due to a family member dying or anything like that. It is due to a POILITICIAN and CRIMINAL whom they like being held legally accountable. It is more than fine to be pleased AND gloat about them crying over that. They have a choice where to put their allegiance, and they chose a serial lying, FELON, sexual abuser POS who wants to get rid of our Constitution and make this country under dictator rule.
F*ck them and f*ck Donald Trump. Every corner of the internet needs to show them how stupid they are.
Sally Vix wrote: "Trump was impeached twice and was found not-guilty twice. He was vindicated. He has been indicted twice and will be found not guilty again. Perhaps call him the Teflon Don but no charges ever stick with him. Maybe because he never did anything wrong? Remember Richard Jewell? People were positive that he was guilty. What happened - oh, he was ultimately cleared of all charges. So too will Donald Trump. You don't have to like Donald Trump but respect the law. He is innocent until he is found guilty."
Shove that prediction up your ass. I was right (I mean, of course I was). You were wrong.
Remember when Richard Jewell was found guilty in the court of public opinion? He was ultimately vindicated. The same will happen with the Trump convictions as this decision is reversed on appeal.
You are a fool.
Jewel was never charged. He was vindicated because he was innocent. Trump is guilty with all the paper trail and audio recordings and witness corroboration to prove it.
You said 10 months ago that he would be found not guilty again. You were wrong. You're wrong about an appeal turning this over too.
Sally Vix wrote: "Trump was impeached twice and was found not-guilty twice. He was vindicated. He has been indicted twice and will be found not guilty again. Perhaps call him the Teflon Don but no charges ever stick with him. Maybe because he never did anything wrong? Remember Richard Jewell? People were positive that he was guilty. What happened - oh, he was ultimately cleared of all charges. So too will Donald Trump. You don't have to like Donald Trump but respect the law. He is innocent until he is found guilty."
Shove that prediction up your ass. I was right (I mean, of course I was). You were wrong.
Remember when Richard Jewell was found guilty in the court of public opinion? He was ultimately vindicated. The same will happen with the Trump convictions as this decision is reversed on appeal.
It was worse than that. Someone leaked details from the FBI search warrant and it came to light that Richard Jewel had (legal) pornography on his premises. Today, the 44% of America that views porn as morally acceptable wouldn't care...but that means 1/2 people would judge him for something they had no right to know.
I'm glad all the back-and-forth here basically boils down to a smug-off, as neither party wants to admit that it's "OK to support Trump/Biden." Just remember that both candidates have policies that should make freedom-loving Americans want to vomit, regardless of political affiliation.
Biden, just to pick a random example, is likely to be vindicated in his usage of backdoor channels to moderate content on social media that contradicts government policy. At least Chevron is going to bite the dust soon (thanks to a case where a govt. agency ruled without statute that commercial fisher have to pay the salaries of government inspectors directly). Trump, if re-elected is going to have his own date with destiny at the highest court in the land, and I mean outside his own legal woes.
Remember when Richard Jewell was found guilty in the court of public opinion? He was ultimately vindicated. The same will happen with the Trump convictions as this decision is reversed on appeal.
It was worse than that. Someone leaked details from the FBI search warrant and it came to light that Richard Jewel had (legal) pornography on his premises. Today, the 44% of America that views porn as morally acceptable wouldn't care...but that means 1/2 people would judge him for something they had no right to know.
I'm glad all the back-and-forth here basically boils down to a smug-off, as neither party wants to admit that it's "OK to support Trump/Biden." Just remember that both candidates have policies that should make freedom-loving Americans want to vomit, regardless of political affiliation.
Biden, just to pick a random example, is likely to be vindicated in his usage of backdoor channels to moderate content on social media that contradicts government policy. At least Chevron is going to bite the dust soon (thanks to a case where a govt. agency ruled without statute that commercial fisher have to pay the salaries of government inspectors directly). Trump, if re-elected is going to have his own date with destiny at the highest court in the land, and I mean outside his own legal woes.
Richard Jewel was not treated fairly. That has NOTHING to do with Donald Trump who has been treated with kid gloves this whole time.
There is no smug-off. Donald Trump was tried for his crimes and he was found guilty. The GOP is the party of law and order, right? No simple policy of Joe Biden's can compare in any way negatively to Trump trying to stay in power despite losing an election OR to being found guilty of 34 FELONY counts.
There are plenty of intelligent individuals who support Trump / oppose Biden. There are plenty of morons who support Biden / oppose Trump. And vice versa. Intelligent individuals can disagree. Just as morons can agree. This trial was 100% political and would not have been tried were Trump still a registered Democrat (as he was when the alleged affair took place). If Trump were still a Democrat, Dems would be lined up in his support, just as they were for Clinton.
If Trump had run as a Democrat, he'd never have made it to a primary debate in 2015. We don't accept criminals and POS like the Rs. There is a reason he ran as a Republican. Look at you guys, you don't even have a conservative party anymore.
Conservative is a fiscal term that applies to taxation and governance.
In American political theory, fiscal conservatism or economic conservatism is a political and economic philosophy regarding fiscal policy and fiscal responsibility with an ideological basis in capitalism, individualism, limit...
It was worse than that. Someone leaked details from the FBI search warrant and it came to light that Richard Jewel had (legal) pornography on his premises. Today, the 44% of America that views porn as morally acceptable wouldn't care...but that means 1/2 people would judge him for something they had no right to know.
I'm glad all the back-and-forth here basically boils down to a smug-off, as neither party wants to admit that it's "OK to support Trump/Biden." Just remember that both candidates have policies that should make freedom-loving Americans want to vomit, regardless of political affiliation.
Biden, just to pick a random example, is likely to be vindicated in his usage of backdoor channels to moderate content on social media that contradicts government policy. At least Chevron is going to bite the dust soon (thanks to a case where a govt. agency ruled without statute that commercial fisher have to pay the salaries of government inspectors directly). Trump, if re-elected is going to have his own date with destiny at the highest court in the land, and I mean outside his own legal woes.
Richard Jewel was not treated fairly. That has NOTHING to do with Donald Trump who has been treated with kid gloves this whole time.
There is no smug-off. Donald Trump was tried for his crimes and he was found guilty. The GOP is the party of law and order, right? No simple policy of Joe Biden's can compare in any way negatively to Trump trying to stay in power despite losing an election OR to being found guilty of 34 FELONY counts.
I hate to say this again ... but Donald Trump - 77 years in NYC with no indictments. 2 years ago he announced he would run for office again -and voila! 90 indictments. Witch Hunt 101.
1) Oh, you're crying. Make sure to put your pillow in the sun so it dries out...you don't want any mold to appear.
2) Rejoicing in your resolve? You were going to vote for Trump either way. Who cares? Your personal wish to have Trump as President doesn't do anything more than count as one vote. Polls have already shown that a percentage of former Trump voters will not vote for him if he's a felon...well, he's a felon. More than 55% of independents said so also. This is not good news for Trump.
3) The fact that many of you morons gave Trump even more money just shows how stupid you are. It's not going to get him elected.
4) Strength in numbers? What are you talking about. You MAAGA morons are a minority. Nearly 20% of Republicans cast their vote for Haley two months after she dropped out. Trump is only loved by the lunatics left in his cult. You don't have the numbers.
You are delusional.
The fact that there is a direct correlation to who spends the most money on campaigns and the winner, shows how stupid you are. Money is the only thing that has gotten presidents elected for long time.
so by giving him money we are bettering his chances.
I hate to say this again ... but Donald Trump - 77 years in NYC with no indictments. 2 years ago he announced he would run for office again -and voila! 90 indictments. Witch Hunt 101.
FACT: Cyrus Vance (New York DA at the time) began issuing subpoenas in the hush money payment case in August of 2019. FACT: Fani Willis launched her investigation into Trump in 2021. FACT: The United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack opened their investigation in July of 2021. FACT: Letitia James opened her New York City business fraud investigation into Trump in 2019. FACT: The National Archives first asked Donald Trump to return the classified documents he took in May of 2021. He only returned some, not all. So, in March of 2022, the FBI opened an investigation. That August, they searched Mar-a-Lago. Donald Trump announced his candidacy on November 15, 2022. FACT: ALL four (4) investigations into Trump were undertaken BEFORE he ever announced he was running again. FACT: Trump's not being indicted in the middle of his campaign, he’s campaigning in the middle of his indictments.
I hate to say this again ... but Donald Trump - 77 years in NYC with no indictments. 2 years ago he announced he would run for office again -and voila! 90 indictments. Witch Hunt 101.
Trump's fines & settlements over the years... 1988: $750K Anti-trust lawsuit Bally 1990: $750K Defamation for accurately predicting Trump Taj Mahal would fail 1991: $200K Removing black workers from casino floor 1991: $30K Circumventing state regulations 1998: $1.4M Hiring of undocumented workers 1998: $447K Money laundering violations 2000: $250K NYS Lobby Commission 2006: $100K Palm Beach flag ordinance 2015: $799K Defamation Trump University Student 2015: $10M Money laundering violations 2016: $50K Data & credit card breaches 2016: $1.3M FEC disclosure errors 2017: $25M: Trump University fraud 2019: $2M: Trump Foundation fraud 2019: $290K: Scotland wind farm 2021: $122M: Trump campaign forced to refund to donors 2022: $110K: Contempt of Court 2022: $750K: Funneling Inaugural funds to his business 2022: $1.6M Guilty 17 counts criminal tax fraud 2023: CFO sentenced to prison 2023: $10K for attacking court personnel 2023: $1M Court sanctions bogus lawsuit including $171K to be paid to Hillary 2023: $5M E Jean Carroll sexual assault 2024: $83.3M E Jean Carroll defamation 2024: $392K Court sanctions bogus lawsuit- NY Times 2024: $453M business fraud
I said it was childish to gloat, not to be pleased. And, if you are pleased, and you feel you need to tell the world about it...please ask yourself why?
In the words of that famous DJ Casey Kasum, talking about the Irish rock band U2, "These guys are from England, and who gives a s**t!"
On a less comic note, I'm old enough to remember Iowa voting down a referendum on same sex marriage and seeing posts on a message board expressing solemn joy at crying lesbians. If you really get off on other people's tears, then you have much bigger problems than a candidate you don't like winning re-election, conviction or no.
Gonna disagree with you here. The Trump tears aren't due to a family member dying or anything like that. It is due to a POILITICIAN and CRIMINAL whom they like being held legally accountable. It is more than fine to be pleased AND gloat about them crying over that. They have a choice where to put their allegiance, and they chose a serial lying, FELON, sexual abuser POS who wants to get rid of our Constitution and make this country under dictator rule.
F*ck them and f*ck Donald Trump. Every corner of the internet needs to show them how stupid they are.
Liberals are truly the dumbest people alive. As Biden weaponizes the justice system in an attempt to jail the political opponent he's trailing in the polls you dumb f*cks are still running around calling Trump a "dictator".
The projection and stupidity are completely off the charts.
Normal people see through your corruption and they are outraged. You idiots have no idea what you've done.
Trump's victory in November is now a foregone conclusion.
The only question is what Trump will do once he's back in power. Will he act like Biden or will he take the high road and try to keep the country from spiraling into 3rd world lawfare as the new norm.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
The fact that there is a direct correlation to who spends the most money on campaigns and the winner, shows how stupid you are. Money is the only thing that has gotten presidents elected for long time.
so by giving him money we are bettering his chances.
What else don’t you understand?
"...election data show that it is true that the candidate who spends more money in a campaign usually wins. But is money the cause of the victory?
It might seem logical to think so...But just because two things are correlated does not mean that one causes the other...
Now picture two candidates, one intrinsically appealing and the other not so. The appealing candidate raises much more money and wins easily. But was it the money that won him the votes, or was it his appeal that won the votes and the money?
That's a crucial question but a very hard one to answer. Voter appeal, after all, isn't easy to quantify. How can it be measured?
It can't, really - except in one special case. The key is to measure a candidate against . . . himself. That is, Candidate A today is likely to be similar to Candidate A two or four years hence. The same could be said for Candidate B. If only Candidate A ran against Candidate B in two consecutive elections but in each case spending different amounts of money. Then, with the candidates' appeal more or less constant, we could measure the money's impact.
As it turns out, the same two candidates run against each other in consecutive elections all the time - indeed, in nearly a thousand US congressional races since 1972. What do the numbers have to say about such cases?
Here's the surprise: the amount of money spent by the candidates hardly matters at all. A winning candidate can cut his spending in half and lose only 1 percent of the vote. Meanwhile, a losing candidate who doubles his spending can expect to shift the vote in his favor by only the same 1 percent. What really matters for a political candidate is not how much you spend; what matters is who you are." - Levitt & Dubner in Freakonomics.
Sally Vix wrote: "Trump was impeached twice and was found not-guilty twice. He was vindicated. He has been indicted twice and will be found not guilty again. Perhaps call him the Teflon Don but no charges ever stick with him. Maybe because he never did anything wrong? Remember Richard Jewell? People were positive that he was guilty. What happened - oh, he was ultimately cleared of all charges. So too will Donald Trump. You don't have to like Donald Trump but respect the law. He is innocent until he is found guilty."
Shove that prediction up your ass. I was right (I mean, of course I was). You were wrong.
Remember when Richard Jewell was found guilty in the court of public opinion? He was ultimately vindicated. The same will happen with the Trump convictions as this decision is reversed on appeal.
Nikki Haley: “There is no way that the American people are going to vote for a convicted criminal. They’re not.” (February 2024)
Former JAG lawyer Ron Desantis:
“Today’s verdict represents the culmination of a legal process that has been bent to the political will of the actors involved: a leftist prosecutor, a partisan judge and a jury reflective of one of the most liberal enclaves in America—all in an effort to "get" Donald Trump. That this case—involving alleged misdemeanor business records violations from nearly a decade ago—was even brought is a testament to the political debasement of the justice system in places like New York City. This is especially true considering this same district attorney routinely excuses criminal conduct in a way that has endangered law-abiding citizens in his jurisdiction. It is often said that no one is above the law, but it is also true that no one is below the law. If the defendant were not Donald Trump, this case would never have been brought, the judge would have never issued similar rulings, and the jury would have never returned a guilty verdict. In America, the rule of law should be applied in a dispassionate, even-handed manner, not become captive to the political agenda of some kangaroo court.”
Nikki Haley: “There is no way that the American people are going to vote for a convicted criminal. They’re not.” (February 2024)
Former JAG lawyer Ron Desantis:
“Today’s verdict represents the culmination of a legal process that has been bent to the political will of the actors involved: a leftist prosecutor, a partisan judge and a jury reflective of one of the most liberal enclaves in America—all in an effort to "get" Donald Trump. That this case—involving alleged misdemeanor business records violations from nearly a decade ago—was even brought is a testament to the political debasement of the justice system in places like New York City. This is especially true considering this same district attorney routinely excuses criminal conduct in a way that has endangered law-abiding citizens in his jurisdiction. It is often said that no one is above the law, but it is also true that no one is below the law. If the defendant were not Donald Trump, this case would never have been brought, the judge would have never issued similar rulings, and the jury would have never returned a guilty verdict. In America, the rule of law should be applied in a dispassionate, even-handed manner, not become captive to the political agenda of some kangaroo court.”
“Today’s verdict represents the culmination of a legal process that has been bent to the political will of the actors involved: a leftist prosecutor, a partisan judge and a jury reflective of one of the most liberal enclaves in America—all in an effort to "get" Donald Trump. That this case—involving alleged misdemeanor business records violations from nearly a decade ago—was even brought is a testament to the political debasement of the justice system in places like New York City. This is especially true considering this same district attorney routinely excuses criminal conduct in a way that has endangered law-abiding citizens in his jurisdiction. It is often said that no one is above the law, but it is also true that no one is below the law. If the defendant were not Donald Trump, this case would never have been brought, the judge would have never issued similar rulings, and the jury would have never returned a guilty verdict. In America, the rule of law should be applied in a dispassionate, even-handed manner, not become captive to the political agenda of some kangaroo court.”
If Desantis is auditioning for a position with Trump he did a poor job here. All of the Trump sycophants know that you must include “Soros Funded” for full effect and to toot the “globalist, antisemitic” dog whistle to the base.
You inability to process this statement is one of many reasons why neither candidate is suitable for office given everyone’s cognitive decline as they reach an advanced age.
I hate to say this again ... but Donald Trump - 77 years in NYC with no indictments. 2 years ago he announced he would run for office again -and voila! 90 indictments. Witch Hunt 101.
Trump's fines & settlements over the years... 1988: $750K Anti-trust lawsuit Bally 1990: $750K Defamation for accurately predicting Trump Taj Mahal would fail 1991: $200K Removing black workers from casino floor 1991: $30K Circumventing state regulations 1998: $1.4M Hiring of undocumented workers 1998: $447K Money laundering violations 2000: $250K NYS Lobby Commission 2006: $100K Palm Beach flag ordinance 2015: $799K Defamation Trump University Student 2015: $10M Money laundering violations 2016: $50K Data & credit card breaches 2016: $1.3M FEC disclosure errors 2017: $25M: Trump University fraud 2019: $2M: Trump Foundation fraud 2019: $290K: Scotland wind farm 2021: $122M: Trump campaign forced to refund to donors 2022: $110K: Contempt of Court 2022: $750K: Funneling Inaugural funds to his business 2022: $1.6M Guilty 17 counts criminal tax fraud 2023: CFO sentenced to prison 2023: $10K for attacking court personnel 2023: $1M Court sanctions bogus lawsuit including $171K to be paid to Hillary 2023: $5M E Jean Carroll sexual assault 2024: $83.3M E Jean Carroll defamation 2024: $392K Court sanctions bogus lawsuit- NY Times 2024: $453M business fraud
And MA6A could give a shlt about any of it, and that’s all that matters. You can bang your head on the wall spinning this stuff all you want and