Highly unlikely the J6 committee would lead their star witness down a testimonial path that could be so easily and immediately impeached. The Secret Service released a statement saying they have been cooperating with the committee since inception over a year ago. There are corroborating witnesses, bet on it.
As someone who voted for Trump. Can someone who is ardently defending Trump and the Republican congressman please explain to me why we are defending this river boat casino hound?
“U.S. Secret Service has been cooperating with the Select Committee since its inception in spring 2021, and will continue to do so, including by responding on the record to the Committee regarding the new allegations surfaced in today’s testimony."
They wouldn’t have asked the question if they didn’t have corroboration for the answer.
“U.S. Secret Service has been cooperating with the Select Committee since its inception in spring 2021, and will continue to do so, including by responding on the record to the Committee regarding the new allegations surfaced in today’s testimony."
They wouldn’t have asked the question if they didn’t have corroboration for the answer.
If there is no corroboration who is more likely to lie?
“U.S. Secret Service has been cooperating with the Select Committee since its inception in spring 2021, and will continue to do so, including by responding on the record to the Committee regarding the new allegations surfaced in today’s testimony."
They wouldn’t have asked the question if they didn’t have corroboration for the answer.
If there is no corroboration who is more likely to lie?
Lemme think… is it the 26 year old full staffer who interned for Scalise and Cruz, with everything to lose and nothing to gain, testifying under oath under penalty of perjury? Or Trump humper Tony Ornato, who was allowed to take a leave from the SS to become a WH political operative?
“As a staffer that works to always represent the administration to the best of my ability and to showcase the good things that he had done for the country, I remember feeling frustrated, disappointed, and really it felt personal. “As an American, I was disgusted. It was unpatriotic. It was un-American. We were watching the Capitol building get defaced over a lie.”
If there is no corroboration who is more likely to lie?
Lemme think… is it the 26 year old full staffer who interned for Scalise and Cruz, with everything to lose and nothing to gain, testifying under oath under penalty of perjury? Or Trump humper Tony Ornato, who was allowed to take a leave from the SS to become a WH political operative?
“As a staffer that works to always represent the administration to the best of my ability and to showcase the good things that he had done for the country, I remember feeling frustrated, disappointed, and really it felt personal. “As an American, I was disgusted. It was unpatriotic. It was un-American. We were watching the Capitol building get defaced over a lie.”
You all realize that if Senior Agent in Charge Engel testifies on camera it will be a further legal disaster for Trump. The agent will corroborate 1) Trump new the mob was armed and headed for the capital; 2) Trump insisted on going to the capital to accompany the mob. The rest is just window dressing. The reports are that the agent will further testify that Trump lost his sh-T in the vehicle. Whether or not the steering wheel or arm was grabbed, who cares? The agent will be an unassailable witness testifying to the essential elements of the story. He will further verify that Trump did have a temper tantrum.
Then, hopefully when the Republicans take back the House and Senate they will pass on bread and circuses and get to work on the people’s business. There are more than enough substantial issues this Administration is too woke, foolish, and unwilling to address.
Then, hopefully when the Republicans take back the House and Senate they will pass on bread and circuses and get to work on the people’s business. There are more than enough substantial issues this Administration is too woke, foolish, and unwilling to address.
more armed marches on the Capitol led by the president, please!
NEW: @SecretService spox Anthony Gugliemi tells me the agents in Trump’s presidential SUV are “available to testify under oath, responding to [Hutchinson’s] new allegations.” (1/2)
Then, hopefully when the Republicans take back the House and Senate they will pass on bread and circuses and get to work on the people’s business. There are more than enough substantial issues this Administration is too woke, foolish, and unwilling to address.
Yeah. They still need to get to the bottom of the Benghazi situation.
Then, hopefully when the Republicans take back the House and Senate they will pass on bread and circuses and get to work on the people’s business. There are more than enough substantial issues this Administration is too woke, foolish, and unwilling to address.
Are there are any decent Republicans left who are willing to disassociate themselves from our national nightmare that is Trump?
If the Agent in Charge, Engel, testifies on camera it’s likely to be a disaster for Trump. The arm grab is irrelevant. In “refuting” the arm grab the agent has already corroborated that Trump knew the mob was armed and that he wanted to accompany them to the Capital. He also already stated that Trump did have a temper tantrum in the vehicle when told he couldn’t go. So, the agent will paint a very unflattering image of Trump and he will confirm the central elements of the story relevant to criminal charges, ie, Trump knew the mob was headed to the Capital to obstruct the proceedings, Trump knew the mob was armed and there was a potential for violence, Trump wanted to accompany this mob.
“According to a report from CNN, White House officials are "losing confidence" that Ukraine will be able to retake all the territory Russia has captured since it invaded on February 24 as Russian forces continue to make gains in the eastern Donbas region. Unnamed US officials told CNN that President Biden’s advisors have started debating if and how the US should start convincing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky should change his definition of what "victory" will look like.”
